Trump Lied Again: Coal Train Will Not Roll Until Miners Made Whole. "No Pay We Stay."

Hello Celticguy,

Agrees on an unproven theory.
What does that say about the state of science ?

It doesn't say anything about science. What it says is you are drawing conclusions that support your predetermined beliefs.

God is an 'unproven theory,' too. That doesn't stop most people from believing in that.
 
Trump says 'the coal industry is back.' The government's jobs numbers say otherwise.

"The protest, which has remained peaceful, began Monday after a train was seen going onto property of Blackjewel, the mine operator that filed for bankruptcy without warning on July 1.
Word quickly spread through the community around Cumberland, a town of about 2,200 in Harlan County in southeastern Kentucky. Dozens of miners began showing up to block the tracks -- angry that they mined the coal, but didn't get paid for the work.

"We're doing without money, food and everything else before our kids are starting back to school. We can't even get clothes or nothing else for them, so it was like a kick in the face," miner Chris Rowe told CNN affiliate WYMT. "That's basically what it was."

"We get our money, this load of coal that's on this train can go by," miner Shane Smith told WYMT. "But until then, there'll be no trains coming in, there'll be no trains going out," "

"A CSX train remains blocked my #blackjewelprotest as it sits fully loaded on a Harlan County railroad track. The miners insist they’re not moving until they get paid."

""The miners showed up [for work] one day and the gates were locked with no notice," the mayor said."

No Pay We Stay


Compositional error fallacy. Blackjewel is not all coal mines, dummy.
 
Hello Celticguy,

Let me guess. You think the major media is part of a massive conspiracy to perpetuate the 'hoax' that industrialization has resulted in climate change.
They have.
The media has properly reported all of the aspects of climate change which are occurring,
Define 'climate change'.
and statements by science about why this is happening.
There is no science. The Church of Global Warming denies science and mathematics.
* You can't create energy out of nothing.
* You can't destroy energy into nothing.
* You can't trap or slow heat.
* You can't trap thermal energy. There is always heat.
* You can't heat the warmer surface using a colder gas.
* You can't trap light.
* You can't reduce the radiance of Earth and increase its temperature at the same time.

If science were to change it's position, yes,
Science is not have a position. Science is not scientists or any group of scientists. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. You are denying them. See the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth using infrared light emitted from Earth's surface.
I do trust the major media to report on that.
Obviously. You have taken the hook, line, and sinker.
No, I do not believe there is some kind of massive media conspiracy to prevent the public from learning the truth about climate change.
The truth? Define 'climate change'. Void argument fallacy.
 
Hello Celticguy,
You act like the fate of the planet all rests on what one person has done and one court case.
A lie. The case is putting your religion in the spotlight for what it is. That's why you discount it.
Sounds like a total diversion from what is happening on the ground right now.
Void argument fallacy. What is happening?
We now have climate refugees from Marsh Harbor in the USA.
Define 'climate refugee'. Define 'climate change'.
How can it get any more real that that?
Easy. Define 'climate change'. Define 'climate refugee'. Describe how 'greenhouse effect' works without violating either the 1st or 2nd law of thermodynamics or the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

No...not so easy after all, is it?
 
Hello Celticguy,



It doesn't say anything about science. What it says is you are drawing conclusions that support your predetermined beliefs.

God is an 'unproven theory,' too. That doesn't stop most people from believing in that.

Scientists agreed with his theory without access to his data. Thats not science. Thats not peer review. Thats activism.
 
Back
Top