Read the whistleblower complaint, new crime!

[Jarod]

This is how many investigations work, a whistleblower goes to the police and says, I heard Johnny is selling tuns of narcotics to kids by the school.

The police go watch the area the whistleblower says the crimes are occuring, see Johnny selling the drugs and arrest him.

 

[reagansghost]

bottom line Trump calculated he could start rigging the 2020 election, in the WH, in secret

it never occurred to him are many people (at least 7 in this case) who actually do back the country over the president, especially history's most corrupt, immoral, and treasonous one yet

 

[Phantasmal]

This is how many investigations work, a whistleblower goes to the police and says, I heard Johnny is selling tuns of narcotics to kids by the school.

The police go watch the area the whistleblower says the crimes are occuring, see Johnny selling the drugs and arrest him.

Thanks, exactly, Twitter is speculating Coates. I hope whomever it is they are protected, Trump wants to treat them as a spy. Trump is unhinged.

 

[Stretch]

Hi Stretch,
It's just amazing how we can see the same news and come to such different conclusions.

So, it's NOT anonymous, Schiff did NOT lie regarding the transcript,
this latest escapade does NOT have the same players, and the drama queens
do NOT still push for impeachment????

It's still groundhog day.

 

[Superfreak]

The transcript of the call was removed from the normal filing system to a top secret system because advisors were afraid the bribe would be exposed. That’s abuse of the top secret system and a cover up.

It’s also consciousness of guilt.

AS usual the board liar doesn't link up to whatever he is rambling about.

 

[CFM]

What definition, show me a definition that requires firsthand knowledge? Loser.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/definition/whistleblower

**

 

[reagansghost]

He's right. There isn't *a* whistleblower. There's more than one, according to the just-released report.

yep, good luck tracking down and prosecuting all those people Barr

just catching a little Fox, funnier than hell. the bubble headed bleach blond completely ignored every fact exposed today....then they queued up Kar Rove after the next segment.....<click>

 

[Superfreak]

He's right. There isn't *a* whistleblower. There's more than one, according to the just-released report.

No, there is one. One who put together a bunch of 'a lot of people told me stuff'. One who just made life for Biden very hard.

 

[Superfreak]

There are lots of times hearsay is admissible in court. It’s always admissible in Congress where the rules of evidence don’t apply.

Keep screaming that there is no whistle blower, I’m sure history will enjoy that one.

Deep throat was all about hearsay.

LINK

 

[Getin the ring]

The transcript of the call was removed from the normal filing system to a top secret system because advisors were afraid the bribe would be exposed. That’s abuse of the top secret system and a cover up.

It’s also consciousness of guilt.

so is THIS IT, jarod

 

[Jarod]

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/definition/whistleblower

**

Where does that say to be a whistleblower one must have direct knowledge?

 

[Jarod]

so is THIS IT, jarod

Maybe, can you answer my question? WHY HIDE IT?

 

[Jarod]

Trumps release of the phone call summary was a HUGE mistake. HUGE.

 

[Superfreak]

Where does the law say that hearsay is inadmissible in this instance? In Congress?

Here are the rules about when it is admissible in Federal Court.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_803

You are grasping for straws. Care to tell us which of those you think applies?

 

[Superfreak]

Where does the law saw hearsay is inadmissible in this case?

Is something being done in a Federal or State Court?

How about you show us why it should be admissible?

 

[Superfreak]

Where does it say a whistleblower must be a direct witness? Just in your head?

How about you show us evidence to back up YOUR position? Or is it just in your head?

 

[Jarod]

You are grasping for straws. Care to tell us which of those you think applies?

I was responding to the claim that hearsay is never admissible.

 

[Jarod]

How about you show us why it should be admissible?

I am not saying it should be admissible, but it will lead to direct evidence. It already has.

 

[Phantasmal]

Trumps release of the phone call summary was a HUGE mistake. HUGE.

I agree, I was shocked.

 

[Jarod]

How about you show us evidence to back up YOUR position? Or is it just in your head?

I am not the one making the claim that the whistleblower is not a whistleblower.

But, I will say that because there is no prohibition against hearsay for whistleblowers, it is allowed for a whistleblower to rely on hearsay.