I would suggest you prove your claims or admit you are a lying gullible dimwit on steroids.
Trump WILL be impeached, Shiff will not be.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
I would suggest you prove your claims or admit you are a lying gullible dimwit on steroids.
floridafan
Verified User
I don't have to prove what hasn't happened you dumb fuck; YOU and the morons like you have to PROVE an event that never occurred, occurred.
One other thing, Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence; THEY have to prove his guilt.
Trump even admits that he asked the Ukraine to investigate the Bidens, and China also. What more do you need
floridafan
Verified User
I would suggest you prove your claims or admit you are a lying gullible dimwit on steroids.
Please, call me whatever you want, the impeachment inquiry will continue either way.
floridafan
Verified User
a law saying that is illegal is a great start
idiots
There is
There is no "impeachment process" occurring. It is a FISHING expedition. If Trump were truly guilty of something and it was as obvious as you nitwits claim it is, there would be a vote on the House floor TODAY.
WHAT evidence? I thought this was a slam dunk. Where's the vote? You have the transcript; what more do you need? VOTE!
The House must VOTE on whether they are going to have an impeachment inquiry. That vote must be passed by a simple majority.
There have been NO subpoenas. This is actually just a made-for-cable-TV political soap opera for the 2020 Presidential race.
You can't have an impeachment inquiry without a House vote and by shutting out the minority party in the process.
you idiots said Russian collusion didn't look good either.
why is it you idiots get to carry on and pretend all your other keyboard drool didn't actually happen?
wrong
The actual transcript is available; share the part where Trump is asking for the Ukrainians to investigate Joe Biden for a favor. I can wait.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?126740-The-Ukranian-NOTHING-BURGER
I know the answer; apparently you're still ignorant of it. So prove it or admit you're a whiny know-nothing who parrots the stupid crap you are fed by CNN.
floridafan
Verified User
There is no "impeachment process" occurring. It is a FISHING expedition. If Trump were truly guilty of something and it was as obvious as you nitwits claim it is, there would be a vote on the House floor TODAY.
WHAT evidence? I thought this was a slam dunk. Where's the vote? You have the transcript; what more do you need? VOTE!
The House must VOTE on whether they are going to have an impeachment inquiry. That vote must be passed by a simple majority.
There have been NO subpoenas. This is actually just a made-for-cable-TV political soap opera for the 2020 Presidential race.
You can't have an impeachment inquiry without a House vote and by shutting out the minority party in the process.
"The House must VOTE on whether they are going to have an impeachment inquiry. That vote must be passed by a simple majority. "
There is absolutely no requirement to do so. You are either a liar, totally ignorant or both.
floridafan
Verified User
I dont watch CNN, I prefer Mary Tyler Moore reruns
Yes, there is. That is the precedent that has always been done. Having four committees doing fishing expeditions and sending out threatening letters is nothing more than hype for the public consumption of morons like you and the PHONY media.
you are so dumb.
they can do oversight. they can call this oversight an impeachment inquiry. They can call it Gary if they want to. It isn't anything special until they vote. Otherwise they have no special powers.
get a clue
floridafan
Verified User
Prove it scum bucket, show us a law or requirement that says so. Then when you can't, apologize and suck me off.
floridafan
Verified User
The vote will come after all of the evidence has been gathered and presented. Relax!
floridafan
Verified User
That would explain your incredible ignorance.
I do know you are a pathetic liar, and cannot prove that the House must take a full vote before an impeachment inquiry can begin.
You aint too bright, my dear.
There is no impeachment inquiry. There are no subpoenas.
You are not to be faulted if you think a formal inquest is under way and that legal process has been issued. The misimpression is completely understandable if you have been taking in media coverage — in particular, reporting on a haughty Sept. 27 letter from House Democrats, presuming to direct Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, on pain of citation for obstruction, to cooperate in their demands to depose State Department officials and review various records.
The letter is signed by not one but three committee chairmen. Remember your elementary math, though: Zero is still zero even when multiplied by three.
ADVERTISEMENT
What is portrayed as an “impeachment inquiry” is actually just a made-for-cable-TV political soap opera. The House of Representatives is not conducting a formal impeachment inquiry. To the contrary, congressional Democrats are conducting the 2020 political campaign.
The House has not voted as a body to authorize an impeachment inquiry. What we have are partisan theatrics, proceeding under the ipse dixit of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). It raises the profile, but not the legitimacy, of the same “impeachment inquiry” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) previously tried to abracadabra into being without a committee vote.
Moreover, there are no subpoenas. As Secretary Pompeo observed in his fittingly tart response on Tuesday, what the committee chairmen issued was merely a letter. Its huffing and puffing notwithstanding, the letter is nothing more than an informal request for voluntary cooperation. Legally, it has no compulsive power. If anything, it is rife with legal deficiencies.
The Democrats, of course, hope you don’t notice that the House is not conducting a formal impeachment inquiry. They are using the guise of frenetic activity by several standing committees — Intelligence, Judiciary, Foreign Affairs, Oversight and Reform, Financial Services, and Ways and Means — whose normal oversight functions are being gussied up to look like serious impeachment business.
But standing committees do have subpoena power, so why not use it? Well, because subpoenas get litigated in court when the people or agencies on the receiving end object. Democrats want to have an impeachment show — um, inquiry — on television; they do not want to defend its bona fides in court.
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/464140-ignore-the-hype-this-is-not-an-impeachment-inquiry