Trump WILL be impeached, Shiff will not be.

floridafan said:
The vote will come after all of the evidence has been gathered and presented. Relax!
Click to expand...

What evidence? You already have the evidence which is why they want to impeach! You vote for an impeachment inquiry first, then present your evidence. The House then votes to impeach or not to impeach.

Moron.
 
floridafan said:
I do know you are a pathetic liar, and cannot prove that the House must take a full vote before an impeachment inquiry can begin.
You aint too bright, my dear.
Click to expand...

The only one lying, flailing and crying here is you. Apparently when lying leftist asshats like you get challenged for facts, you get triggered. ;)
 
Truth Detector said:
There is no impeachment inquiry. There are no subpoenas.

You are not to be faulted if you think a formal inquest is under way and that legal process has been issued. The misimpression is completely understandable if you have been taking in media coverage — in particular, reporting on a haughty Sept. 27 letter from House Democrats, presuming to direct Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, on pain of citation for obstruction, to cooperate in their demands to depose State Department officials and review various records.

The letter is signed by not one but three committee chairmen. Remember your elementary math, though: Zero is still zero even when multiplied by three.
ADVERTISEMENT

What is portrayed as an “impeachment inquiry” is actually just a made-for-cable-TV political soap opera. The House of Representatives is not conducting a formal impeachment inquiry. To the contrary, congressional Democrats are conducting the 2020 political campaign.

The House has not voted as a body to authorize an impeachment inquiry. What we have are partisan theatrics, proceeding under the ipse dixit of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). It raises the profile, but not the legitimacy, of the same “impeachment inquiry” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) previously tried to abracadabra into being without a committee vote.

Moreover, there are no subpoenas. As Secretary Pompeo observed in his fittingly tart response on Tuesday, what the committee chairmen issued was merely a letter. Its huffing and puffing notwithstanding, the letter is nothing more than an informal request for voluntary cooperation. Legally, it has no compulsive power. If anything, it is rife with legal deficiencies.

The Democrats, of course, hope you don’t notice that the House is not conducting a formal impeachment inquiry. They are using the guise of frenetic activity by several standing committees — Intelligence, Judiciary, Foreign Affairs, Oversight and Reform, Financial Services, and Ways and Means — whose normal oversight functions are being gussied up to look like serious impeachment business.

But standing committees do have subpoena power, so why not use it? Well, because subpoenas get litigated in court when the people or agencies on the receiving end object. Democrats want to have an impeachment show — um, inquiry — on television; they do not want to defend its bona fides in court.

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/464140-ignore-the-hype-this-is-not-an-impeachment-inquiry
Click to expand...

Believe what you wish, but the impeachment process moves forward, and you cannot stop it.

I just wonder how you know that no subpoenas have been issued.
 
floridafan said:
Believe what you wish,
Click to expand...

It's not what I believe you assclown, it is the FACT.

floridafan said:
but the impeachment process moves forward, and you cannot stop it.
Click to expand...

It isn't an impeachment process. It is a clown show intended to be pabulum for dumbasses like you.

floridafan said:
I just wonder how you know that no subpoenas have been issued.
Click to expand...

Have you seen any? Pompeo denounced the demand from the Democrats because it wasn't a subpoena, it was a letter.

So why are they sending out threatening letters? Because this isn't a legitimate impeachment inquiry and if they send subpoena's, it now ends up in the courts challenged where time is not on their side and their weak pathetic case would get thrown out for lack of any merit.
 
Teflon Don said:
Are you 100% certain of that Jarod? Or 10-30% certain?

I am 100% certain that he will not be impeached. Nancy will not take a vote. If she had the votes, she would do it right now
Click to expand...

I believe you are wrong.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top