Article 1, Section 2, Clause 5

[floridafan]

As you said.... Google it

Told you that you screwed yourself.

There is nothing to Google

 

[floridafan]

What part of "precedent" are you having difficulty with you brain dead hack? Good lord you're a stupid mother fucker.

Precedent means absolutely nothing, just another smoke screen

 

[floridafan]

I did you idiot. It was the link Garud posted.

Bull shit, sweetie

 

[Truth Detector]

Precedent means absolutely nothing, just another smoke screen

Law is based on precedent you whiny know-nothing on steroids.

 

[Superfreak]

Bull shit, sweetie

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress#Subpoenas

Sorry moron, no matter how much you run and/or lie... it happened. Sorry you are too ignorant to comprehend. That is Garud's problem as well. He questioned the quote even though it was the very link he quoted from. That is how ignorant you idiots are.

 

[Truth Detector]

Bull shit, sweetie

^^Stuck on moron.

Here is the extent of your debate style; "Nuh Uh" Moron.

 

[floridafan]

For the simpletons too stupid to scroll up to get it...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress#Subpoenas

Nowhere does it say anything about a vote, NOWHERE

 

[Superfreak]

For the simpletons too stupid to scroll up to get it...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress#Subpoenas

Just because Floridafan will need to see the above a few dozen more times before admitting it has been posted.

 

[Truth Detector]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress#Subpoenas

Sorry moron, no matter how much you run and/or lie... it happened. Sorry you are too ignorant to comprehend. That is Garud's problem as well. He questioned the quote even though it was the very link he quoted from. That is how ignorant you idiots are.

Notice how he runs away from his threads when his bullshit is exposed? What a lying coward.

 

[Superfreak]

Nowhere does it say anything about a vote, NOWHERE

LMAO... poor delusional moron.

"First, the committee's investigation of the broad subject area must be authorized by its chamber;"

 

[floridafan]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress#Subpoenas

Sorry moron, no matter how much you run and/or lie... it happened. Sorry you are too ignorant to comprehend. That is Garud's problem as well. He questioned the quote even though it was the very link he quoted from. That is how ignorant you idiots are.

NOWHERE does it say anything about a vote

 

[Superfreak]

Notice how he runs away from his threads when his bullshit is exposed? What a lying coward.

garud runs every single time... occasionally he will come back to say 'I am here, then he proceeds to run away from actually addressing the thread'

 

[floridafan]

LMAO... poor delusional moron.

"First, the committee's investigation of the broad subject area must be authorized by its chamber;"

Prove that that means a vote. I am sure a committee head or chair can authorize their own investigation.

 

[Superfreak]

NOWHERE does it say anything about a vote

Tell us... how does the authorization by the chamber occur???

"First, the committee's investigation of the broad subject area must be authorized by its chamber;"

 

[Superfreak]

Prove that that means a vote. I am sure a committee head or chair can authorize their own investigation.

If you are sure, then you can provide the details giving them the power.

But given it specifically states it must be authorized by its chamber, I am guessing you are full of shit.

 

[Cinnabar]

Breaking: Impeachment Imminent!

 

[PostmodernProphet]

False, The power of the house to issue subpoenas does not come from the fact of it being voted on as an impeachment investigation. Silly. If you’re truly a lawyer you know better than that.

the power of the House to issue subpoenas is not the power of Nancy to issue subpoenas......I am truly a lawyer and I know that.........why don't you.....as an officer of the court I can issue a subpoena in Michigan.......can my neighbor issue one since he lives next to me?......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Who says it requires a vote? That’s stupid. There is no way that says you must vote to proceed on investigating impeachable acts.

in what other instances do you believe the House acts without actually acting?.....

 

[Jarod]

Also, link us up to some of these investigations they run without voting to run them.

Hillary’s emails

 

[PostmodernProphet]

"First, the committee's investigation of the broad subject area must be authorized by its chamber; second, the investigation must pursue "a valid legislative purpose" but does not need to involve legislation and does not need to specify the ultimate intent of Congress; and third, the specific inquiries must be pertinent to the subject matter area that has been authorized for investigation."

Bam... now run away moron.

you nailed his balls to the wall with one shot......