Article 1, Section 2, Clause 5

[Jarod]

they won't be collecting any evidence if they don't get the authority to seek it out......

Are you trying to claim that the foreign affairs committee does not have authority to issue subpoenas on foreign affairs? You are dumber than usual.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Are you trying to claim that the foreign affairs committee does not have authority to issue subpoenas on foreign affairs? You are dumber than usual.

link the scope of authority for the standing committee and apply it to the issue of impeachment of a president.......please try to limit your response to two, double spaced pages......

 

[floridafan]

only if you consider that void between his ears to be a chamber.....

Forgive me if I tell you that you really dont know shit. You just make this up as you go along, sweetie.

 

[floridafan]

not a valid one........just one that can be ignored as unauthorized by the chamber.....

. There are serious contempt of congress penalties for ignoring a subpoena.

 

[Jarod]

link the scope of authority for the standing committee and apply it to the issue of impeachment of a president.......please try to limit your response to two, double spaced pages......

Your claim is ludicrous, somehow the fact that it might relate to impeachment limits the foreign affairs committee’s authority?

 

[OG Yurt]

There is nothing to Google

Yet you asked for a cite


LOL

 

[Jarod]

https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/about/?sec=jurisdiction

 

[Jarod]

Run away!

 

[OG Yurt]

I’m pointing out that the issues they are investigating fall under their purview. You’re stupid if you don’t think they don’t. Many years ago the house intelligence committee was authorized to investigate and issue subpoenas on anything relating to the intelligence agencies. The house for an affairs that he is authorized to investigate And issue subpoenas on anything relating to foreign affairs. That includes impeachable things.

Holder

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Forgive me if I tell you that you really dont know shit. You just make this up as you go along, sweetie.

you are forgiven.......the Word says we are to be tolerant of the feeble minded.....

 

[PostmodernProphet]

. There are serious contempt of congress penalties for ignoring a subpoena.

only real ones......

 

[floridafan]

only real ones......

hang in their honey bunch you will soon see what is real.

 

[Truth Detector]

I’m pointing out that the issues they are investigating fall under their purview. You’re stupid if you don’t think they don’t. Many years ago the house intelligence committee was authorized to investigate and issue subpoenas on anything relating to the intelligence agencies. The house for an affairs that he is authorized to investigate And issue subpoenas on anything relating to foreign affairs. That includes impeachable things.

What issues? The FAKE Ukrainian one? The FAKE Mueller one? The FAKE obstruction one? It's hard to tell which FAKE issue they are on from day to day.

 

[Truth Detector]

Are you trying to claim that the foreign affairs committee does not have authority to issue subpoenas on foreign affairs? You are dumber than usual.

What legislative issue, or foreign affair issue are they investigating?

 

[OG Yurt]

Holder

 

[Truth Detector]

. There are serious contempt of congress penalties for ignoring a subpoena.

Not if the subpoenas subvert the Constitution you dumbass.

 

[Gonzomin]

Where does it say the President has to comply?

Gowdy said so. The notion that you can withhold information and documents from congress ,no matter whether the party in power or not in power, is wrong. Respect for the rule of law must mean something , irrespective of the vicissitudes of political cycles.
The president is doing what none have done since Nixon. It did not work out well for him. Trump has no respect for the law and the reds are sucking up to him and his horrible beliefs.

 

[Sailor]

Gowdy said so. The notion that you can withhold information and documents from congress ,no matter whether the party in power or not in power, is wrong. Respect for the rule of law must mean something , irrespective of the vicissitudes of political cycles.
The president is doing what none have done since Nixon. It did not work out well for him. Trump has no respect for the law and the reds are sucking up to him and his horrible beliefs.

What has Trump with held? Surely you have have something.

 

[Into the Night]

The House decides how to go about impeachment, not the president!

No, the Constitution decides how to go about impeachment, not the House, not the Senate, and not the President.

 

[Into the Night]

the House decides how to go about impeachment, not Nancy.......she does not have the power to issue executive orders.......

No, the Constitution decides this, not the House. Things like observing the 4th and 5th amendment, Articles I, II, and III, and the 14th amendment MUST be observed.