SYRIA--Baghdadi dead, blew himself as US helicopter SPEC OPS raid moved in.

In November 2002, U.S. President George W. Bush, visiting Europe for a NATO summit, declared that "should Iraqi President Saddam Hussein choose not to disarm, the United States will lead a coalition of the willing to disarm him."[2]
The Bush administration briefly used "coalition of the willing" to refer to the countries who supported, militarily or politically, the 2003 invasion of Iraq and subsequent military presence in post-invasion Iraq. The original list released in March 2003 included 46 members.[3] In April 2003, the list was updated to include 49 countries, though it was reduced to 48 after Costa Rica objected[4] to its inclusion. Of the 48 countries on the list, three contributed troops to the invasion force (the United Kingdom, Australia and Poland). An additional 37 countries provided some number of troops to support military operations after the invasion was complete.
The list of coalition members provided by the White House included several nations that did not intend to participate in actual military operations. Some of them, such as Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Palau and Solomon Islands, did not have standing armies. However, through the Compact of Free Association, citizens of the Marshall Islands, Palau and the Federated States of Micronesia are guaranteed US national status and therefore are allowed to serve in the US military. The members of these island nations have deployed in a combined Pacific force consisting of Guamanian, Hawaiian and Samoan reserve units. They have been deployed twice to Iraq. The government of one country, the Solomon Islands, listed by the White House as a member of the coalition, was apparently unaware of any such membership and promptly denied it.[5] According to a 2010 study, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands and Palau (and Tonga and the Solomon Islands to a lesser extent) were all economically dependent on economic aid from the United States, and thus had an economic incentive to join the Coalition of the Willing.[6]
In December 2008, University of Illinois Professor Scott Althaus reported that he had learned that the White House was editing and back-dating revisions to the list of countries in the coalition.[7][8] Althaus found that some versions of the list had been entirely removed from the record, and that others contradicted one another, as opposed to the procedure of archiving original documents and supplementing them with later revisions and updates.[3]
By August 2009, all non-U.S./UK coalition members had withdrawn from Iraq.[9] As a result, the Multinational Force – Iraq was renamed and reorganized to United States Forces – Iraq as of January 1, 2010. Thus the Coalition of the Willing came to an official end.
 
The UN inspectors were finding NO WMDs when they were working there

Bush KICKED THEM THE FUCK OUT


and did shock and awe anyway
 
evince said:
do you remember the phrase "coalition of the willing"


Bush KICKED OT THE UN INVESTIGATORS TO ATTACK IDIOT
Click to expand...

Please show me were the president of the United States can order the removal of United Nations personnel? So you are FULL OF SHIT twit!
 
Eagle-Eye said:
I will remind you that we weren't alone in Iraq! In fact sport you ignore the fact that

So this was Bush's war is and always was total bullshit. The fucking UN thought Saddam had WMDs and wanted him taken out.
Click to expand...

the UN INSPECTORS WERE FINDING NONE IDIOT


shut your fucking lie hole
 
I saw an interview with intelligence experts who were wincing at Trump’s press conference. He was so anxious to pound his chest he gave out too many details and possibly betrayed more allies.

The details he gave could only have been provided by intelligence assets on the ground. So, what is their status now? Did he place them at risk by being so specific on the presence of tunnels and their locations? It shouldn’t be much of a chore for ISIS to figure out who would have provided those details.

What a fucking idiot.
 
so they finally got him,, this is like the 4th time they thought they had him. Baghdadi had more lives then a cat-
but he finally ran out of luck . Alhamdulillah
 
domer76 said:
I saw an interview with intelligence experts who were wincing at Trump’s press conference. He was so anxious to pound his chest he gave out too many details and possibly betrayed more allies.

The details he gave could only have been provided by intelligence assets on the ground. So, what is their status now? Did he place them at risk by being so specific on the presence of tunnels and their locations? It shouldn’t be much of a chore for ISIS to figure out who would have provided those details.

What a fucking idiot.
Click to expand...

ROFLMAO

says the guy who said nothing about Obama exposing Seal Team Six

Cry harder bitch
 
evince said:
In November 2002, U.S. President George W. Bush, visiting Europe for a NATO summit, declared that "should Iraqi President Saddam Hussein choose not to disarm, the United States will lead a coalition of the willing to disarm him."[2]

The Bush administration briefly used "coalition of the willing" to refer to the countries who supported, militarily or politically, the 2003 invasion of Iraq and subsequent military presence in post-invasion Iraq. The original list released in March 2003 included 46 members.[3] In April 2003, the list was updated to include 49 countries, though it was reduced to 48 after Costa Rica objected[4] to its inclusion. Of the 48 countries on the list, three contributed troops to the invasion force (the United Kingdom, Australia and Poland). An additional 37 countries provided some number of troops to support military operations after the invasion was complete.

The list of coalition members provided by the White House included several nations that did not intend to participate in actual military operations. Some of them, such as Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Palau and Solomon Islands, did not have standing armies. However, through the Compact of Free Association, citizens of the Marshall Islands, Palau and the Federated States of Micronesia are guaranteed US national status and therefore are allowed to serve in the US military. The members of these island nations have deployed in a combined Pacific force consisting of Guamanian, Hawaiian and Samoan reserve units. They have been deployed twice to Iraq. The government of one country, the Solomon Islands, listed by the White House as a member of the coalition, was apparently unaware of any such membership and promptly denied it.[5] According to a 2010 study, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands and Palau (and Tonga and the Solomon Islands to a lesser extent) were all economically dependent on economic aid from the United States, and thus had an economic incentive to join the Coalition of the Willing.[6]

In December 2008, University of Illinois Professor Scott Althaus reported that he had learned that the White House was editing and back-dating revisions to the list of countries in the coalition.[7][8] Althaus found that some versions of the list had been entirely removed from the record, and that others contradicted one another, as opposed to the procedure of archiving original documents and supplementing them with later revisions and updates.[3]

By August 2009, all non-U.S./UK coalition members had withdrawn from Iraq.[9] As a result, the Multinational Force – Iraq was renamed and reorganized to United States Forces – Iraq as of January 1, 2010. Thus the Coalition of the Willing came to an official end.
Click to expand...

I remember that. As those DETAILS came out, I remember calling it the coalition of the willing, the bought and paid for and the wannabes. Remember the countries? Besides ENGLAND and CANADA, that was an interesting list of allied countries.
 
Centerleftfl said:
I remember that. As those DETAILS came out, I remember calling it the coalition of the willing, the bought and paid for and the wannabes. Remember the countries? Besides ENGLAND and CANADA, that was an interesting list of allied countries.
Click to expand...

and the russo bot hole history rewrite crew is here trying to say that the UN backed the attack on Iraq
 
dukkha said:
he was driven out of Mosul (Iraq) when the coalition liberated it.. He had to have a safe space.
Idlib is west of Aleppo -not much fighting there now
Click to expand...

good thing for Isis that trump freed up all those perspective replacements for him


and now we have no way of stopping that and PUTIN IS IN CONTROL IN SYRIA


our proud military is protecting Putins Syrian OIL though

licking ass for Putin to cash in on the Syrian oil fields


why are we fucking risking American lives for that?
 
Centerleftfl said:
We might wanna remember Baghdadi was IN CUSTODY in Iraq in 2003--he was Al Qaeda before it metastasized into ISIS. We let him go.
Click to expand...
he was AQI leader. He was released in 2004 as low level..
he took over from AQIs founder ( I think) al-Zarqawi who was killed by the US in Iraq
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top