Teflon Don
I'm back baby
It was a transcript. You lie.
I have heard nothing from any witness that said what is in the transcript is completely wrong, so I can only assume that it is 100% correct.
COMMITTEES RELEASE TESTIMONY OF YOVANOVITCH AND McKINLEY - PUBLC HEARINGS COMING UP
- Thread starter reagansghost
- Start date
It was a transcript. You lie.
I have heard nothing from any witness that said what is in the transcript is completely wrong, so I can only assume that it is 100% correct.
If it was a transcript, then what's with all the ellipses?
I would not read Mueller - I missed nothing. Mueler was a political hit job.
I for sure am not reading a transcript of a corrupted process!!
they did when they could, but Schiff scheduled them on Saturday in some case, and multiple hearing schedule conflicts.. being there doesn't mean anything when the parlimentarian was SchifF
when they finally get around to that it won't matter either.
Judiciary will hold hearings BASED ON A SCHIFF REPORT!! ROFL.. *pig circus*
Vindman says it was wrong, that it didn't include key phrases and words.
Plus, it's littered with ellipses. What's with that? What's going on in the ellipses?
Again, to give yourself plausible deniability.
That shit isn't going to work in public hearings.
No, they just chose not to. They could attend any of the hearings and over 40+ were allowed to attend, but less than 1/4 actually did.
"OMG WE HAVE TO DO OUR JOBS!!! EHRMEGERD!"
If your strategy is to whine about Schiff, that isn't going to play very well when you're confronted with the testimony.
Maybe your strategy should be to close your eyes, and stick your fingers in your ears while yelling "lalalalalalalala".
You overestimate your own ability to parry these charges away. Screaming about how unfair Schiff is, during Public Hearings, will backfire.
You don't have plausible deniability.
you idiot.
Mueller was a stammering mess, but did manage to croak out there was "no corrdination by ANY American
why would I want to read what Andrew Weissmann put together after that?
why the SCIF? Schiff said in every testimony the material was not classified -and then leaked it anyhow!
WTF do you call that? answer: a corrupt process.
and no this isn't a distraction, unless you think us funding a proxy war against Russia s a "distraction"
Kilimnik was a US State Dept asset -what does it mater?
not me pal. There is no reason for secret courts, secret Schiff Star chambers-
why do you support such?
you are the one whining
You haven't read the Mueller Report and you'll never read it because of what it means for your credibility and defense of Trump.
It's that simple.
If you don't read it, it gives you plausible deniability over its contents.
Thing is, unlike Mueller, this Ukraine stuff will be aired in public, so your strategy of "see no evil, hear no evil" won't work.
That's why you're attacking the people and process, but not the substance. You're trying to discredit the substance by attacking the characters of the people who presented it, but your own character is shit because of all the IDs you switch between on this board at any given time, and the fact that you were easily conned by a grifter reality TV show host.
What was leaked?
I've heard this charge dozens of times, but every time I've asked for what was leaked, you change the subject or just ignore the question.
Again, that's your strategy of plausible deniability.
Now you're just off the deep end, making ludicrous claims in order to obfuscate the substance of what Trump did that you've been supporting this whole time; collusion with foreign powers to influence an election.
Shame.
Manafort didn't know that...so why was Manafort sharing polling data with him?
This is a 100% reversal from previous Conservative positions.
You whined about Schiff.
You whined about SCIF
You whined about it being "in secret" despite GOP participation.
All you do is whine and refuse to read.
is that like "burn the lifeboats?" you have so many memes
attend what? A Schiff Circus?
how can you be in 2 places at once when you are nowhere at all?
the testimony is rotten to the core - which is why peeling back the layers on the process is important. you are basically looking at cooked books for truth
could be. with the media 100% wholly non-inquisitive and simply amping up Dems garbage, it certainly is a challenge.
But true patriots don't flinch when it come to fighting back on un-American procedings
See what I mean? The moment your strategy is called out you try to manipulate the conversation away from your shitty tactics.
That's not going to work during public hearings.
Centerleftfl
Verified User
OUTSTANDING!
Centerleftfl
Verified User
Are you lying or STUPID? Asked answered. NOW everyone gets TRUMP'S transcript and the REAL one.
The transcripts have been released and you have yet to actually point to where they show it was a circus. In fact, the transcripts show Republicans asking questions. So explain to me how the process is a circus, yet the GOP involved in it? Maybe it's a "circus" because of GOP involvement.
There were plenty of hearings during the week that y'all chose not to attend.
This is weak sauce.
This is a gaslighting defense and the ultimate in plausible deniability; just claim the whole process is rigged, that way you can plausibly deny the substance of what is discovered. Then let the court of pubic opinion decide while you try every tactic you can to poison it.
You must think people are as stupid as you. The contempt Conservatism has for truth and justice is apparent; but it's always been that way going back to 1964.
Yet you flinch at reading.
Reading words makes you flinch.
That's how I know this is all going to come apart for you, and how you'll try to re-brand yourself after this under new IDs that continue to argue all the same, stupid points.
Again, it's because you think people are as stupid as you are.
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
OMG
are you brain dead? start with the opening statement -given in a SCIF right?
no collusions/no quid -Russian collusion was a nothing burger, Ukraine collusion the same
damn straight. The Republic Weeps
Mueller knew it( he had access to source docs) and STILL relied on that as evidence of
"Russian interference" -why Mueller is nothing more then fish wrappings
I'm not ideological.
I care about due process, transparency, and the Best Path forward whomever espouses it.
I actually supported Hillary in '08. Her deep role in Libya war 2011 -creating a terrorist state -changed all that.
GOP could NOT LEAK unlike SCHIFF DID, under penalty of an ethics compliant
I don't read Pravda's "truth" either
The opening statements aren't classified and never have been.
So this is you moving the bar and inventing a standard that doesn't exist.