gfm7175
Jesus is LORD!
Democrats haven't even impeached him yet, moron... He can't be tried if he isn't impeached.
DOW hits new record breaking heights - LV426 and Katzgar shitting their diapers
- Thread starter Truth Detector
- Start date
Democrats haven't even impeached him yet, moron... He can't be tried if he isn't impeached.
Jade Dragon
And I'm the one that jaded you.
The conservative lemmings sure love making rich people richer. What's in it for them? Farmers are suffering and had to be bailed out. Prices are slowly increasing all over. Blue-collar jobs are disappearing just the same. Drug prices are skyrocketing and many insurers aren't covering many of them at an increased rate. I could go on and on.
DOW is currently up 235 points and hitting new all time records. Trump hating leftists shitting their diapers all over the world right now. Stay tuned!
Haven't you heard? Things are actually "TERRIBLE" right now!!
Labor unions, including , but not limited to Teachers, Police , EMT and Firemen, are ALL INVESTED IN THE MARKETS VIA THEIR UNION 401Ks and other retirement options, as are TENS of MILLIONS of OTHER AMERICANS.
WHY DO YOU HATE AMERICANS, ESPECIALLY TEACHERS, LAW ENFORECEENT OFFICERS, and FIREFIGHTERS SO MUCH?????
The farmer bailout is more than double what the auto bailout was.
Yeah, for returns below what pensions used to get.
For millions, 401(k) plans have fallen short
https://www.cnbc.com/2015/03/20/l-it-the-401k-is-a-failure.html
Traditional pensions had better ROI's than 401k's, particularly over the last decade.
Currently, only half of all American workers have retirement savings, and for those workers 55+, the average amount they have in their 401k's is a mere $178,000. And that's obviously skewed up by high earners with substantial 401k accounts.
So the 401k system was a failure, is a failure, and will be a failure forever.
Getin the ring
Verified User
The "farmer bailout" is so we can land our trading partners onto a fair playing field in the long run, without hurting our farmers in the short run.
I realize that this may be above your understanding level of the economics.
the Auto Bailout was printing money so that Obama could say he bailed us out of the recession, just like the trillion he printed that was supposed to go towards infrastructure shovel ready jobs that he allowed the states to piss away, with no infrastructure jobs created.
Your lack of knowledge on just about every subject is simply astounding
No, it's a thinly veiled attempt to buy the votes of trash who you screwed over because you were too dumb to understand the consequences of your policy, and too arrogant to admit you're wrong.
Where'd you learn this shit? At Trump University?
Not sure what the fuck you're trying to say here, but the stimulus saved and/or created over 1.5 million jobs. That's according to the Senate and the CBO, so you can suck on it, loser.
Secondly, most of the stimulus you hated so much were tax cuts that make you wet. So I don't understand why you hated the stimulus so much, when a plurality of it were tax cuts. Maybe explain why you oppose tax cuts in 2009, but support them today.
Thirdly, if it wasn't for the stimulus, there would have been more QE than what there was because Conservatives refused to do anything to recover the economy, because doing so would be a tacit admission that all the policies they supported during Bush the Dumber caused it. And...to get back to what I said earlier...you are too arrogant to admit you fucked up.
You make shit up as you go, and then you scream and whine whenever anyone rejects your fiction.
You're a coward.
Explain how giving $30B in welfare to farmer trash puts them on a level playing field.
You realized you had to spend $30B buying their votes because the Trade War wasn't easy to win, was it?
Because of OBAMA, "OVER THE PAST DECADE". No kidding.
Not true AT ALL IN THE PAST THREE YEARS.
The stock market grew more during Obama's eight years than Bush's.
In fact, the stock market grew more in Obama's first three years than Trump's.
In 2018, the DJIA shrank by 5%.
Since the start of the shitty Russia Tax Cut in January 2018, the DJIA has grown by an average of less than 0.5% per month...which is the worst rate of growth in a decade.
#Winning by #Losing.
I am perfectly willing to put my neck out and predict. You can't because you know your rhetoric and your party are full of shit.
There you go with that moronic "he cheats" meme again. You won't take the bet because you know your rhetoric and your party are full of shit.
You sound just as stupid as LV426. In truth, you won't take the bet because you know your rhetoric and your party are full of shit.
No, no, and the last is just laughable, if Donny falls you will be out of here quicker than a hot knife thru butter
He was letting us pay for the damage that his policies created. He took tax money to preserve his voting bloc. just Trump being Trump...stupid.
Yup...$30B vote buy, right there.
Remember this the next time a Conservative accuses a Democrat of trying to buy votes with policy proposals.
You one sentence quote from a single source fails to address other events which started before Bush took over. The repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act and the lowering of interest rates by the Fed to 1%, for example.
The Washington Post did a good series explaining the many factors involved. Blaming the housing crisis on Bush alone is simplistic partisan posturing.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...e-goes-viral/2011/10/31/gIQAXlSOqM_story.html
None of which have anything to do with the lowering of lending standards for subprime loans.
NOTHING.
There is no line of text from the G-S repeal in 2000 that said to dramatically weaken lending standards four years later.
If lending standards for subprimes weren't dramatically weakened in 2004, then there would not have been a subprime bubble and subsequent economic collapse.
Sometimes only one person or party is to blame. You can't BoTh SiDeS this.
The Op-Ed you are using as the basis of your argument is bullshit.
There was nothing in the CRA that said in 2004, underwriting standards for subprime loans had to be dramatically weakened.
There was nothing in the 2000 repeal of Glass-Steagal that said in 2004, underwriting standards for subprime loans had to be dramatically weakened.
The crisis was rooted in the poor performance of subprime mortgages issued from 2004-2007.
Bush was the one whose regulators ceased enforcement of lending standards for subprime loans, causing subprimes to rise from 10% of all new mortgage issues in 2002 to 40% by 2006.
Also, we know which mortgages were the ones that ended up causing the turmoil...see the below chart. Notice how the subprime delinquency rates spike way higher for mortgages issued between 2005-7 vs. 2002?
WHY DO YOU THINK THAT IS, FLASH? Why do you think subprime mortgages issued between 2005-7 had such dramatically higher (and sooner) spiking delinquency rates than subprimes issued from 2002????
You know why. You just don't want to say because you'll have to admit I'm right and that your BoThSiDeS is bullshit. You don't want to do that because you know I'll never let you hear the end of it. You also don't want to do that because pulling at that BoThSiDeS thread will end up unraveling your entire perspective and belief system; that everyone is the same and only you have the temperance and moderate judgment.
COMPLETE FUCKING LIES.
You're seriously trying to pretend the Obama economy was BETTER THAN TRUMP'S????
Trump has already exceeded the growth of the markets over OBAMA's ENTIRE TERM.....SPARE THE LOW-INFO BULLSHIT FOR YOUR FELLOW LEFTISTS.
COMPLETE FUCKING LIES.
You're seriously trying to pretend the Obama economy was BETTER THAN TRUMP'S????
Trump has already exceeded the growth of the markets over OBAMA's ENTIRE 1st TERM DESPITE THE TREASURY PRINTING $12 TRILLION in PLAY MONEY for the INVESTMENT HOUSES TO DUMP IN THE MARKETS.....SAVE THE LOW-INFO BULLSHIT FOR YOUR FELLOW LEFTISTS.
Last edited: