2 gay men adopt 11 y.o. boy. Teacher fired for criticism of it.

[Earl]

Even if it is, which part of lets say Amendment 1 (where they can believe that it isn't a sin, even if you do), Amendment 4 (Where they have a right to privacy), Amendment 2 (where they have a right to defend themselves) is negated by stuff that grosses you out?

This is why I associate more with libertarians than republicans. I am a conservative, but I am conservative and I really BELIEVE in the Constitution and in personal freedoms and responsibility.

Grossness is not the line where their rights end. They have an absolute right to believe differently than you, and to practice those beliefs. That your God calls it an abomination doesn't change this 1st Amendment right.

I don’t believe that I advocated for violating Amendment 1, 2 or 4.

I gave my belief, based on the word of God, that homosexuality is a perverted ,deviant abomination.

The First Amendment gives one the right to express a belief, even one with which you disagree.

I also posted that my belief in God’s word mandates that one speak out against the sin of perversion.

Free speech has very few limitations, Oracle.

 

[DigitalDave]

just trying to keep it real,
no one thinks of the child and the additional problems he or she might face trying to grow up normally.
It's all about what's best for the adults in these cases, 'they deserve a baby', 'it's only fair to them', 'society will just have to accept it'

The epitome of your argument is simply that we should not let anyone weird or different adopt a child because the kid might get made fun of. It's hilarious, honestly, that you probably don't see that.

The child is happy, despite your beliefs. The whole argument that 'no one thinks of the child' is simply nonsense, when the problems they face are coming from those who seem to believe they'll have problems and want to impose their believe system onto them. It IS your problem to deal with, and you'll just have to accept that.

 

[Earl]

As Gettin the Ring so wisely posted:

“A child needs a Mom and a Dad, two Dads with no Mom is a recipe for problems, on a few fronts

and firing the teacher because he or she spoke out is another problem all together.”

 

[Earl]

Perversion should never be accepted.

 

[katzgar]

Perversion should never be accepted.

I agree get back in your mother's basement where you belong

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

you are a pervert

Hey boy. You got shit in your ears.? I told you nobody calls me a pervert. I am 100% normal and ordinary.

 

[katzgar]

Hey boy. You got shit in your ears.? I told you nobody calls me a pervert. I am 100% normal and ordinary.

You are a pervert

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

no one thinks of the child and the additional problems he or she might face trying to grow up normally.
It's all about what's best for the adults in these cases, 'they deserve a baby', 'it's only fair to them', 'society will just have to accept it'

Might face??? This kid is going to be psychologically destroyed and libs say it's ok because queers have the "right" to do that. Kid will probably get AIDS now too. My god, this is horrible.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Even if it is, which part of lets say Amendment 1 (where they can believe that it isn't a sin, even if you do), Amendment 4 (Where they have a right to privacy), Amendment 2 (where they have a right to defend themselves) is negated by stuff that grosses you out?

This is why I associate more with libertarians than republicans. I am a conservative, but I am conservative and I really BELIEVE in the Constitution and in personal freedoms and responsibility.

HAHAHA. You say you believe in the constitution and yet you say amendment 4 mentions the right to privacy. That is a brazen lie.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

The epitome of your argument is simply that we should not let anyone weird or different adopt a child because the kid might get made fun of.

Again we catch you lying. This is NOT about the kid being ridiculed by other kids. It's about this kid being physically abused by his "dads".

 

[Charoite]

Might face??? This kid is going to be psychologically destroyed and libs say it's ok because queers have the "right" to do that. Kid will probably get AIDS now too. My god, this is horrible.

Oh, quit whimpering nonsense, candyass. Your trolltard nonsense needs to at least have some base substance to it.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

I also posted this topic at the politicaljack website, and they just deleted it. They call themselves an "open forum" but they in fact are super-liberal. People have a right to challenge the idea of letting queers adopt kids. Make that a DUTY.

Maybe if you were less of a faggot, nigger?

 

[Damocles]

I don’t believe that I advocated for violating Amendment 1, 2 or 4.

I gave my belief, based on the word of God, that homosexuality is a perverted ,deviant abomination.

The First Amendment gives one the right to express a belief, even one with which you disagree.

I also posted that my belief in God’s word mandates that one speak out against the sin of perversion.

Free speech has very few limitations, Oracle.

God's word, at least that of your god, says to "judge not"... your sins aren't "lesser" and what you mete out to them will come back to you. Matthew 7:1.

While I agree there are few limitations on your 1st Amendment rights of free speech, I also recognize their full bore equivalent right to believe differently and to voice that.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Oh, quit whimpering nonsense, candyass. Your trolltard nonsense needs to at least have some base substance to it.

So you defend this? You want to let perverts adopt kids knowing the kids will suffer horrible abuse.??? Please kill yourself.