PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello ziggy,
Just mention the 'i' word and that means he's trying to get him impeached? Only in R land.
Just mention the 'i' word and that means he's trying to get him impeached? Only in R land.
That was a bad witness for Democrats.
She could barely conceal her disdain for Trump or his supporters and dragged Trump’s underage son into it.
That’s going to turn off independents.
Hello Darth,
I would agree that the Democrats should slow down, not worry about the primary season, and gather far more evidence before sending it over. What have they got to lose? The impeachment news is dominating the news cycle which is a welcome change from having it be all about what Trump decides it will be. And the more it gets talked about the more time it has to sink in for those who do not recognize either the misconduct or the evidence pointing to the President.
I disagree that the word impeachment was initiated too early. When Nancy Pelosi understood the initial evidence she had no other choice. Clearly there has been misconduct by the President of a very serious matter which cannot be overlooked. And it cannot wait until the next election because the nature of the misconduct affects that election. The President sought foreign intervention into that election. And it is a pattern of abuse. He previously sought Russia, and later China to interfere with our elections. If he is not stopped he will do it again. And there is also a pattern of obstruction which began in the Mueller Investigation and continued into the Ukriane Scandal. This misconduct cannot be overlooked. Pelosi had no choice.
all three were #neverTrumps or worse ( one guy wanted to impeach on Trump's tweets) but she was especially vile.That was a bad witness for Democrats.
She could barely conceal her disdain for Trump or his supporters and dragged Trump’s underage son into it.
That’s going to turn off independents.
You just let the cat out of the bag lol.
Yes, ‘Impeachment is in the news’—just as planned, even though democrats can’t decide what, exactly, the impeachable offense is. One day it’s one thing and the next day it’s the next thing. And this, without hard evidence of ANYTHING.
If the process wasn’t slipshod, Democrats would just be holding *hearings* sans the word ‘impeachment’ until it was established what, if anything, was done by Trump that warrants impeachment.
Democrats are using impeachment as a political weapon against Trump. Abusing Impeachment, as a political weapon and the founders warned us of this very thing.
yesterday was a joke.......after weeks of testimony without evidence we have a day of testimony from people who acknowledge they know not a single material fact in Schiff's report who give their "expert" opinion on whether they would impeach Trump........the other two lawyers on the board, if they are prepared to admit it, know that none of yesterday's testimony would have been admissible in court for it called for a decision on the ultimate fact.......it is the role of Congress to decide if Trump can be impeached, not four (actually three) law school professors.....
now I know there will be a string of idiots who will repeat their meme that this isn't a court of law and they don't have to prove there is a crime........you are right.......but if you don't prove there was a crime and don't act as one should in a court of law you will not convince the public that Trump did something wrong.........
impeach him without cause or procedure........give up all hope of defeating him next year........give up control of the House.......take your chance Ginsberg can live four more years........lose seats in the Senate.......I look forward to every minute of your demise......