StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Typo! Typo! I found a typo! Look everyone, a typo! [cue maniacal overcompensating laughter].
View attachment 13191
Is that why you think you're getting laughed at?
Schiff breaks the law again to conduct his lawless witch partisan witch hunt
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
Is that why you think you're getting laughed at?
Are you disputing Mr. Badguy?
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Do I dispute that this is lawless? Yes, because impeachment is legal. That this is partisan? Yes, because this isn't about politics. That this is a witch hunt? Yes, because the crime was already confessed to and now we have a mountain of evidence.
Mr.Badguy
Super lefty
Typo! Typo! I found a typo! Look everyone, a typo! [cue maniacal overcompensating laughter].
View attachment 13191
LMAO you were just making fun of Micawber for what YOU wrote, without realizing it. Can you get any fucking stupider?
Um...no. Of course that's not what I'm asking about. You appear to have some serious reading comprehension issues that maybe we need to devote some time to.
View attachment 13204
Obviously, what I was referring to was the subject we were discussing when I asked it...you apparently disputing Mr. Badguy's assertion that the counterpoint here is: "I found a typo."
Again you fail to comprehend what you've read. Impeachment as a constitutional power is not what's being identified here as illegal, imbecile.
Yes, the collusion hoax produced zero evidence or charges, followed by the obstruction charade producing zero evidence or charges, followed by the Ukraine hoax producing no evidence or charges...because Democrats are just following the evidence.
And it doesn't matter that Democrats have ACTUALLY committed all the offenses they keep getting caught falsely accusing others of. Partisanship? What partisanship?
View attachment 13205
There's nothing to see here. Just move along.
View attachment 13209
*Non-crime. Non-controversy, in fact.
Meaning literally zero actual evidence (third and fourth party conjecture, speculation, opinions, and feelings about non-crimes isn't evidence, dumb-ass).
Last edited:
View attachment 13206
Asking him to clarify what he was talking about is "making fun of him?" Um...sure.
Your literacy issues are no one's problem but your own. He interrupted a debate to post an incoherent off-topic sentence fragment. It naturally came off as moronic. You're trying to turn that into me saying that my own typo made him stupid.
Desperate and weak.
View attachment 13207
Try again.
View attachment 13206
Asking him to clarify what he was talking about is "making fun of him?" Um...sure.
Your literacy issues are no one's problem but your own. He interrupted a debate to post an incoherent off-topic sentence fragment. It naturally came off as moronic. You're trying to turn that into me saying that my own typo made him stupid.
Desperate and weak.
View attachment 13207
Try again.
you are a liar and a moron