Study debunks Democrat conspiracy theory about Russians stealing the election

Arminius said:
From your own study: "The study does not prove Russian interference swung the election to Trump." :rofl2:

The only thing your study even discusses being POSSIBLY indicated by the data is that "Trump's poll numbers improved when Russian trolls were active." This is literally nothing more than a cum hoc, ergo propter hoc fallacy (these two things happened at once, therefore one must have CAUSED the other). It's the falsehood of misrepresenting correlation for CAUSATION...and it isn't even affirmatively claiming THAT falsehood. It's pure speculation about a POSSIBILITY.

View attachment 13531

This is why liberals cannot afford to let the other side have rights or debate on a level playing field anytime ever. It doesn't get any more flimsy or laughable than this trash. :laugh:



If you can't tell at this point, then you have zero hope of ever understanding. :lolup:

View attachment 13532
Click to expand...

If they Russians had such a big impact on Trump's poll numbers, then maybe JPP liberals can explain why the MSM reports show Hillary overwhelming winning!! :dunno:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
If they Russians had such a big impact on Trump's poll numbers, then maybe JPP liberals can explain why the MSM reports show Hillary overwhelming winning!! :dunno:
Click to expand...

Exactly. Where was this supposed bump in the polls for Trump when the Democrat news media was busy telling everyone that Hillary literally had a 92% chance of winning? There was obviously zero science behind the left's polling to begin with.

:laugh:

View attachment 13782
 
dukkha said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Reality check:
https://www.needtoimpeach.com/mueller/
Click to expand...

posing yet one more Mueller report summary is not a rebuttal of the points made about the elusive "Russian cutout"
and Assange's claim that WIKI never took secrets from a government .
Among other thing like the Russian IRA being a Kremlin Op.

Please reply with some content other then raw links
Click to expand...

TRANSLATION: Trump chumps and right wing wonks only consider information that supports their viewpoint as valid. BUT IF INFORMATION THAT COMES FROM THE VERY SAME SOURCE CONTRADICTS THEIR VIEWPOINT, SUDDENLY IT'S NOT VALID. :nono: Sorry son, but that dog of yours just won't fly.

My link documents the very pages from the report to validate its summary. You'd know that if you learned how to read carefully and comprehensively. Get back to me when you do.
 
The simple truth is Russia used an army of soldiers trained in cyber to attack America's election to help Trump. They invested 1.5 million a month. They got involved in Trump demonstrations and rallies helping him. They attacked Hillary and ran pro Trump groups at her rallies. They sent emails, Facebook, and tweets by the millions. They got inside the election machines in every state.
Yet some stupid righty keeps running threads saying Russia did not matter in one of the closest elections of all time. He won some states by under 1 percent. Can rightys be that delusional?: You can always find a study among them all that proves the opposite of the truth. This is an example. There are 6 trump workers who Mueller tossed in jail for working with Russians. He indicted 30 more.
A recent study makes a connection that when Russian trolls were very active, Trump's numbers went up.
 
Taichiliberal said:
TRANSLATION: Trump chumps and right wing wonks only consider information that supports their viewpoint as valid. BUT IF INFORMATION THAT COMES FROM THE VERY SAME SOURCE CONTRADICTS THEIR VIEWPOINT, SUDDENLY IT'S NOT VALID. :nono: Sorry son, but that dog of yours just won't fly.

My link documents the very pages from the report to validate its summary. You'd know that if you learned how to read carefully and comprehensively. Get back to me when you do.
Click to expand...

Taichiliberal said:
Here's how I schooled your equally dim compadre, Army. Take heed, or continue to chuckle like the willfully ignorant and proud joker that you seem to present. https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...s-stealing-the-election&p=3425620#post3425620
Click to expand...

His point is valid. You aren't arguing. You're just posting a random link and expecting everyone to sift through a bunch of bullshit to figure out your point. Your argument is YOUR responsibility to present, not his to waste a bunch of time trying to sort out. And you've humiliated yourself at literally every step of this debate. As usual, while talking all kinds of shit, you've "schooled" no one but yourself.

:laugh:

View attachment 13804

Grow up, pouting crybaby. :crybaby:
 
Last edited:
FastLane said:
They didn’t get what they wanted then. In 2016 the idiot was a Democrat. Trump out worked her and won.
Click to expand...

Isn't it hilarious that those who colluded with Russia to illegally spy, frame Trump, and rig an election are constantly crying about others "interfering" in "our democracy" based on nothing but debunked conspiracy theories?

They're so bitter they didn't get to finish stealing an election for once. :laugh:

View attachment 13805
 
Nordberg said:
The simple truth is Russia used an army of soldiers trained in cyber to attack America's election to help Trump.
Click to expand...

And Bernie, none of which had any impact. Try to keep up. :palm:

Democrats colluded with Russia to illegally spy, frame Trump, and rig the election. They welcomed endless truckloads of illegal immigrants with voter registration forms. They are the party of ACORN that pretends requiring a free ID to vote is some racist dirty trick. They weaponized government to hinder and sabotage their opponents during a major national election. They have 95% of the news media, academia, and Hollywood spewing their lies and rigging everything in their favor.

Democrats compromised the 2016 election in every way they could think of...and the moment they were told a DEBUNKED CONSPIRACY THEORY about anyone else supposedly cheating, they lost their minds for four years straight.

:yayaseesathreadban:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top