"John Bolton willing to testify in Trump's impeachment trial"

I thought the House had all the proof they need?

They feel they do, however, given that Mitch has proclaimed that it is going to be nothing more than a show trial the more evidence bought forward that was denied them previously only strengthens their arguments
 
Wouldn’t Trump be clamoring for the Senate to dismiss the trial if he had something to hide lol?

Here he is doing just the opposite. Democrats apparently learned nothing when Trump was shouting ‘no collusion’ on Twitter for months—and he turned out to be right.

Also, witnesses will include ALL witnesses or there will be no witnesses.

Unless the republicans just want play stupid.

He is clamoring for a quick trial, a Mitch, in and out "vindication," he even questions why a trial even needs to occur given he thinks it all is a hoax, just like the kid in Jersey on his computer

Forget the "no collusion" theme, one understanding is the legal definition, the other common sense, as your man Lindsey says in his southern accent, "if the grass is wet when you step out you can pretty much gamble that it rained," or do you really believe Junior was eager and anxious to meet with Russians in Trump Tower cause it was really about adoptions

And all witnesses, who are the Republicans going to call to defend Trump, did you think Trump wants those with first hand knowledge of events to have to testify in a trial under oath
 
Bolton always appears bitter, lol.

Any white lib think Bolton wants a Pres. Liz Warren? :rofl2:

Well if Bolton does know something that supports the drug deal he described as happening he surely wants to make sure that history doesn't associate him with the cover up
 
Hello Darth,

Which is what lol?

You’re so anxious to ‘get Trump’ you forget to think. One of the explanations for Democrats dropping the ball on the Bolton subpoena is they were unsure what he has to say.

I bet that thought has never occurred to you.

Yeah, I think Democrats would like to take that risk.

Well, we'd like to hear why Bolton called what Giuliani was doing a 'drug deal.'

And why he thought Giuliani was 'a hand grenade that was going to blow everybody up.'

If Trump and Republicans really wanted the whole truth to come out then we need to sworn testimony from:

Bolton
Giuliani
Mulvaney
Perry
McGahn
OMB
Pompeo
Parnas
Pence
Nunes
Felix Sater
William Barr

And of course:

President Trump.

Yeah. Subpoena his act. No reason that can't be done.

And how about we get all of the required documents released?

All the State records.

WH records

Computer files

emails

texts

Trump's financial records.

After all, Trump said he would release his taxes if President Obama released his Birth Certificate.

Obama released it. Time for Trump to stop lying and start following through on what he said he was going to do.

He's such a liar.

You guys are supporting a liar, you know.

Pathetic.
 
Well if Bolton does know something that supports the drug deal he described as happening he surely wants to make sure that history doesn't associate him with the cover up

What drug deal are you talking about?
 
What’s your plan for convincing Justice Roberts to dismiss Zelensky’s testimony in a trial?

Your speculation lol?

Wait a minute, you think Trump attorneys are going to call the leader of a foreign nation to come testify? He is under no obligation to show up, certainly doesn't want to get his country involved in American domestic matters, and can't be forced to appear, that is Hannity thinking
 
Wouldn’t Trump be clamoring for the Senate to dismiss the trial if he had something to hide lol?

Here he is doing just the opposite. Democrats apparently learned nothing when Trump was shouting ‘no collusion’ on Twitter for months—and he turned out to be right.

Also, witnesses will include ALL witnesses or there will be no witnesses.

Unless the republicans just want play stupid.

Play!

:laugh:
 
He is clamoring for a quick trial, a Mitch, in and out "vindication," he even questions why a trial even needs to occur given he thinks it all is a hoax, just like the kid in Jersey on his computer

Forget the "no collusion" theme, one understanding is the legal definition, the other common sense, as your man Lindsey says in his southern accent, "if the grass is wet when you step out you can pretty much gamble that it rained," or do you really believe Junior was eager and anxious to meet with Russians in Trump Tower cause it was really about adoptions

And all witnesses, who are the Republicans going to call to defend Trump, did you think Trump wants those with first hand knowledge of events to have to testify in a trial under oath

Trump said there was no collusion, no conspiracy and it was a hoax.

Right on all three counts.

Why don’t you believe him now?
 
Wait a minute, you think Trump attorneys are going to call the leader of a foreign nation to come testify? He is under no obligation to show up, certainly doesn't want to get his country involved in American domestic matters, and can't be forced to appear, that is Hannity thinking

They have his public statements.

Twice, the alleged victim denied any pressure from Trump.
 
Trump said there was no collusion, no conspiracy and it was a hoax.

Right on all three counts.

Why don’t you believe him now?

Trump said a lot of stuff, the majority of which turned out to be a lie or fabrication, few outside of the Fox bubble believe anything Trump says, he wasn't correct then, nor is he correct now, otherwise he would let anyone on his staff testify to set the record straight
 
He has information that no one who testified to date has!

How do you know this? Have you seen his testimony? You're too big of a moron to even comprehend how stupid you look.

tumblr_inline_pm6afgUHuC1ss6i96_540.gif
 
Hello Darth,

What’s your plan for convincing Justice Roberts to dismiss Zelensky’s testimony in a trial?

Your speculation lol?

Good luck subpoenaing a head of foreign State. There won't be any testimony from Zelensky. You have no testimony. All you have is not sworn public statements under heavy duress. But we know Republicans will be quick to accept whatever they can get to support their flimsy story. And for most Trump fans, it really doesn't take much. Any far -fetched explanation will do. That much is obvious. Fighting corruption indeed. That story is as solid as a straw house.

But I tell you what.

Trump himself would be more than welcome to come get sworn in and testify any time he wants to. Unless he's afraid...............................................
 
If he had knowledge and/or information that would exonerate TRE45ON, you can bet your bippy he would have been hauled out and paraded around by Rudy et al by now. The fact that not a single person -- who has actual knowledge -- has come forward to defend TRE45ON speaks volumes. Sorry, Zelenskyy doesn't count. Extortion victims concerned about whether or not they will receive what was promised are not reliable.

No one has been charged with treason you ignorant, stupid, pathetic, repugnant asshat. :rolleyes:
 
They feel they do, however, given that Mitch has proclaimed that it is going to be nothing more than a show trial the more evidence bought forward that was denied them previously only strengthens their arguments

There doesn't need to be any more evidence presented at trial Arsecheese; that was the House's job. But thank you for proving what a weak, stupid and pathetic case the Democratic Party of the Jackass has.
 
Well if Bolton does know something that supports the drug deal he described as happening he surely wants to make sure that history doesn't associate him with the cover up

Drug deal? Now you are flailing and looking like a complete asshole. :rolleyes:
 
They have his public statements.

Twice, the alleged victim denied any pressure from Trump.

And that vindicates Trump? If that is Trump's defense he is in trouble, that is like taking the word of a guy with a gun pointed at his head saying he never felt intimidated
 
Back
Top