"John Bolton willing to testify in Trump's impeachment trial"

[floridafan]

Which is what lol?

You’re so anxious to ‘get Trump’ you forget to think. One of the explanations for Democrats dropping the ball on the Bolton subpoena is they were unsure what he has to say.

I bet that thought has never occurred to you.

Of course it never occurred to me because that never happened. Just more of your lies.

 

[Truth Detector]

Perhaps, no one knows, Bolton is conservative, but he also appears bitter at Trump, and the one question sure to come up is why he said he wanted nothing to do with the drug deal, drug deal referring to the shenanigans surrounding Trump holding up aid

Bigger concern though is if Bolton testifies the Democrats can then make a case for the other three to testify, putting Mitch in a difficult position

NO one will be forced to testify in the Senate trial. The assumption being that the House gathered all their profound evidence before voting for impeachment.

The notion that we need more evidence is the pinnacle of stupidity Democrats and leftists like you wallow in every fucking day.

 

[Truth Detector]

As I said, it won't be good for this administration. He can tell us the whole truth.

How do you know this ass clown?

 

[floridafan]

So you claim no one has a clue about what he is going to say, you claim others who think he won't add anything are jerkoffs, but you know it won't be good? STFU you assclown.

he was a very detailed note taker, this administration is scared of what he may say.

 

[floridafan]

How do you know this ass clown?

https://www.axios.com/john-bolton-i...sWzt62h94uw8BwZXg8rSKEnd1Xs8G7AWfgfj4z0O4KreY

 

[Truth Detector]

he was a very detailed note taker, this administration is scared of what he may say.

Again, how do you know what he will say? What notes do you think will be "bad for the administration?" You really are one dumb ass pimple.

 

[floridafan]

Again, how do you know what he will say? What notes do you think will be "bad for the administration?" You really are one dumb ass pimple.

I understand just how worried you are.

 

[Truth Detector]

https://www.axios.com/john-bolton-i...sWzt62h94uw8BwZXg8rSKEnd1Xs8G7AWfgfj4z0O4KreY

So you think the speculative bullshit in that article indicates something no one knows exists? What a buffoon. You really are one dumb ass pimple.

 

[Truth Detector]

I understand just how worried you are.

I understand why you have to lie and bloviate like a moron every damned day.

 

[Ross Dolan]

My original thought:

Be careful what you wish for.

My sister just offered me another:

"Well, you knew I was a scorpion...and you knew my nature!"

 

[floridafan]

Again, how do you know what he will say? What notes do you think will be "bad for the administration?" You really are one dumb ass pimple.

read post #25

 

[floridafan]

So you think the speculative bullshit in that article indicates something no one knows exists? What a buffoon. You really are one dumb ass pimple.

He has information that no one who testified to date has!

 

[PostmodernProphet]

You know just what his testimony will entail? if so, you are a bigger jerk off than I thought.

has he made no public statements in the last three years?......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Honey bunch aint got a clue as to what he might say, but it won't be good for this administration.

lol.....

 

[PostmodernProphet]

As I said, it won't be good for this administration. He can tell us the whole truth.

that's how we know you will be disappointed......

 

[Darth Omar]

Hardly, Pelosi can hold the articles over Trump's head denying him the desperate "vindication" he wants dearly and provide a campaign issue for McConnell's moderate Senators up for reelection.

Lindsey may want to kiss Trump's ass with a rule change but that is never going to resolve the issues I just stated, in fact, it would exaggerate them

Wouldn’t Trump be clamoring for the Senate to dismiss the trial if he had something to hide lol?

Here he is doing just the opposite. Democrats apparently learned nothing when Trump was shouting ‘no collusion’ on Twitter for months—and he turned out to be right.

Also, witnesses will include ALL witnesses or there will be no witnesses.

Unless the republicans just want play stupid.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

So, you seem to have a clue about what he’s going to say lol.

Want to let the rest of us in on it?

If he had knowledge and/or information that would exonerate TRE45ON, you can bet your bippy he would have been hauled out and paraded around by Rudy et al by now. The fact that not a single person -- who has actual knowledge -- has come forward to defend TRE45ON speaks volumes. Sorry, Zelenskyy doesn't count. Extortion victims concerned about whether or not they will receive what was promised are not reliable.

 

[archives]

What would John Bolton say that is counter to what we already know?

No one knows, but he was in the room, and as I noted, one of the first questions is going to be why did he describe the shenanigans occurring as a drug deal

 

[PostmodernProphet]

https://www.axios.com/john-bolton-i...sWzt62h94uw8BwZXg8rSKEnd1Xs8G7AWfgfj4z0O4KreY

do you are basing it on Jonathan Swan's testimony.......

 

[Darth Omar]

If he had knowledge and/or information that would exonerate TRE45ON, you can bet your bippy he would have been hauled out and paraded around by Rudy et al by now. The fact that not a single person -- who has actual knowledge -- has come forward to defend TRE45ON speaks volumes. Sorry, Zelenskyy doesn't count. Extortion victims concerned about whether or not they will receive what was promised are not reliable.

What’s your plan for convincing Justice Roberts to dismiss Zelensky’s testimony in a trial?

Your speculation lol?