GAO releases finding: TRUMP broke the law withholding Ukrain funds

volsrock said:
Law does NOT say they have to be dispersed immediately, says they have to be dispersed “by the end of the fiscal year. They were so this GAO announcements is pure partisan drivel without a shred of fact to it.

An Obama appointee made this decision. The OMB says they are wrong. Says delays in disbursements are normal in these situation.
Click to expand...

Not correct. the bill had a sunset clause. If it was not given to Ukraine, it would have gone back to the House to be ended or reappropriated. Trump let go 2 days from the last date. Trump did break that law a pile of others.
 
volsrock said:
Law does NOT say they have to be dispersed immediately, says they have to be dispersed “by the end of the fiscal year. They were so this GAO announcements is pure partisan drivel without a shred of fact to it.

An Obama appointee made this decision. The OMB says they are wrong. Says delays in disbursements are normal in these situation.
Click to expand...

Not correct. the bill had a sunset clause. If it was not given to Ukraine, it would have gone back to the House to be ended or reappropriated. Trump let go 2 days from the last date. Trump did break that law a pile of others.
 
volsrock said:
Law does NOT :blah: :blah: :blah: :blah: pure partisan drivel without a shred of fact to it.

An Obama appointee :blah: :blah: :blah: :blah: normal in these situation.
Click to expand...

volsrock said:
Where in the :blah: :blah: :blah: :blah: “immediately”
Click to expand...

volsrock said:
Has Joe Biden :blah: :blah: :blah: :blah:
Click to expand...

volsrock said:
The agency :blah: :blah: :blah: :blah: amount to a hill of :blah: :blah: :blah: :blah:
Click to expand...

:blah: :blah: :blah: :blah: :blah: :blah: :blah: :blah: :blah: :blah: :blah: :blah:

45b10a8986d571677b9261a3f97f72fe80c6d91fd69a2dc1289ff52737bb096f.jpg
 
volsrock said:
Really? Where does it say that in the law? Since the funds were released weeks before the deadline there is nothing wrong.

My understanding is that Congress mandated the Whitehouse to vet foreign aid packages before releasing the money. That is what they were doing.
Click to expand...

Your understanding is dead wrong. You know that the ONLY reason the funds were released was because trump got caught by the whistleblower.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Obama isn't president, and that conspiracy theory about drug cartels is where your bullshit can be found.
Click to expand...

right, which is why documents were given executive privilege to keep them from a congressional investigation........................

admit that you're a partisan hack full of shit that would cover up a democrat eating babies........
 
volsrock said:
Really? Where does it say that in the law? Since the funds were released weeks before the deadline there is nothing wrong.

My understanding is that Congress mandated the Whitehouse to vet foreign aid packages before releasing the money. That is what they were doing.
Click to expand...

:lolup:
 
Grokmaster said:

Yeah...IT's REEKING IN THE OP.....the GAO has ZERO LEGAL AUTHORITY, and ITS POLITICAL/LEGAL OPINIONS ARE LIKE TITS ON A BULL....
Click to expand...

Utter nonsense.

What the GAO has, is something called EXPERT KNOWLEDGE on the subject in question.

They also have something called HIGH CREDIBILITY in matters related to the subject in question.

Something else they have.... LAWYERS.

Lots of them.

From their website:

What GAO Lawyers Do

GAO's Office of the General Counsel (OGC) serves GAO and the Congress, following the federal dollar wherever it goes. The scope and depth of our legal expertise is unparalleled in the federal government. Check out our blog post on GAO's Attorneys.

Most of our attorneys are assigned to teams to provide legal advice, analysis, and services to the Comptroller General and GAO analysts assessing federal programs. These services can fall under such diverse practice areas as:

homeland security and immigration
environment and energy
banking and financial services regulation
health care
administrative law and regulatory process
telecommunications
federal contracts
information technology
criminal law
constitutional law
legislative drafting and analysis

We also have a group of attorneys who act as quasi-administrative law judges to resolve disputes over the award of federal contracts. Read more about our bid protest process.

Another group serves as the federal government’s experts on appropriations law. Read more about our appropriations law work.

In addition, some of our attorneys serve as in-house counsel to GAO. We deal with a variety of issues in equal employment opportunity, personnel, and labor laws. We also represent GAO in administrative hearings and litigation involving GAO’s work.

https://www.gao.gov/about/careers/career-paths/legal-careers/
Click to expand...

You Trumpturds are tripping all over yourselves trying to downplay the significance of their statement and disparage them as not being a very powerful or influential agency of the Federal govt, but you're just running your mouths and proving not only how stupid you are, but how desperately in denial you are to boot.

Fucking bunch of clowns just like Trump.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top