The Democrats witness dilemma

The Republican Senate would most assuredly, with a simple majority vote, prevent any attempt to limit witnesses.

The Democrats appear to believe that only their witnesses, if any are even called, should be called.

Oh, Hell no.
 
Darth Omar said:
Well, there are questions surrounding how this all began.

The I.G. stated that there was an indication of bias in favor of a democrat contender [hmm..I wonder who that might be lol?]. Furthermore, there was alleged contact between the WB and Schiff and/or members of his staff prior to the release of the WB report.

This raises the question of whether the WB had ‘help’ in crafting the document. And if that went on, it raises a host of other questions.

If one party wants to remove a president every effort should be made to ensure the whole process—from beginning to end, was done ‘fairly’, right?

Let’s not become Russia.
Click to expand...

The wb information was confirmed and expanded upon by other witnesses, It is just a coincidence that as soon as the WB came forward, the funds were immediately released?
 
Earl said:
The Republican Senate would most assuredly, with a simple majority vote, prevent any attempt to limit witnesses.

The Democrats appear to believe that only their witnesses, if any are even called, should be called.

Oh, Hell no.
Click to expand...

When it comes to key witnesses like the so called whistleblower, Democrats suddenly oppose that POS being called.
 
floridafan said:
The information the wb furnished has been confirmed and expanded upon by several other witnesses. Thats all you need to know.
Click to expand...

HEARSAY.

DOESN'T ANSWER THIS:



To determine if this was a set up....by the same people who brought us ILLEGAL SPYING and the RUSSIA LIE....
 
floridafan said:
The wb information was confirmed and expanded upon by other witnesses, It is just a coincidence that as soon as the WB came forward, the funds were immediately released?
Click to expand...

In other words, you only want certain witnesses.

It's not a pick and choose, Kunta.
 
floridafan said:
Fuck off honey bunch. I can only picture what would happen tp that person when your kind found out a name and address.
Click to expand...

Just as expected. You can't provide a good reason and you start making up things.

I've offered you the opportunity to come where I am. In fact, you posted pictures, along with others of YOUR KIND, claiming it was me and where I lived. That means, based on what you provided, you know. Why haven't you shown? Why didn't you bring your fellow n-ls with you?

I'm giving you another chance to back up your "fuck off" demands. Are you going to take me up on it or run like a 2nd class pussy.
 
CFM said:
In other words, you only want certain witnesses.

It's not a pick and choose, Kunta.
Click to expand...

I don't control the witness selection honey bunch. Speak to your Senators. By the way, didn't you recently gloat over the possibility that there would be no witnesses called?
 
floridafan said:
Once Congress approves funding there is only a very slight ability to hold up funding by the President. He did not go that route
Click to expand...

Wrong. Separate and co equal branches of government

Let me ask you this. When Congress approved funding to build a wall and Obama didn't build it, did Obama obstruct Congress?

When Obama chose what immigration laws to follow or not follow was he obstructing Congress?

The questions don't get easier puddin.
 
Frank Apisa said:
My guess is that if Trump confessed to blackmailing and extorting Zelensky solely for his personal political benefit...AND SHOT SOMEONE ON FIFTH AVENUE JUST FOR THE FUN OF IT...

...the assholes who support him will continue to support him...

...and the Republican Senators, all terrified of those moronic, continued supporters, will acquit him.

If the trial were fair...and Republican Senators not terrified of the abomination, Trump...calling both Bidens would not mean a thing. If they were both dirty up to their eyeballs WOULD NOT JUSTIFY withholding the appropriation.

My guess is that Chief Justice Roberts would rule against the Bidens testifying...and I doubt the senators would vote to overrule him.
Click to expand...

I’m pretty sure it’s entirely up to the Senate whether any witnesses are called.

If Roberts is going to disallow the Biden or the WB—he has to justify his reasoning. Or more likely he would want to hear arguments for and against it. Or if he wants to disallow them on sheer fiat—that gives every republican a good reason to vote for acquittal.

I just wrote several paragraphs in favor of hearing from them. It’s pretty much a slam dunk, actually. Which takes us back to the OP point and the ‘witness dilemma’ for Democrats.
 
CFM said:
Just as expected. You can't provide a good reason and you start making up things.

I've offered you the opportunity to come where I am. In fact, you posted pictures, along with others of YOUR KIND, claiming it was me and where I lived. That means, based on what you provided, you know. Why haven't you shown? Why didn't you bring your fellow n-ls with you?

I'm giving you another chance to back up your "fuck off" demands. Are you going to take me up on it or run like a 2nd class pussy.
Click to expand...

You need to speak to your Senators, not me.
 
floridafan said:
I don't control the witness selection honey bunch. Speak to your Senators. By the way, didn't you recently gloat over the possibility that there would be no witnesses called?
Click to expand...

You do control your opinions on which ones you think should be called and clearly it's a pick and choose.

Another cop out answer from a low class coon.
 
Teflon Don said:
Wrong. Separate and co equal branches of government

Let me ask you this. When Congress approved funding to build a wall and Obama didn't build it, did Obama obstruct Congress?

When Obama chose what immigration laws to follow or not follow was he obstructing Congress?



The questions don't get easier puddin.
Click to expand...

You told me that trump was allowed to do as he did by the constitution. Why won't you post the relevant parts, miss totally full of shit?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top