87 Senators Voted For Ukraine Aid, Objected to Halt, But Now Want No Evidence Why

PoliTalker

Diversity Makes Greatness
87 Senators Voted For Ukraine Aid, Objected to Halt, But Now They Want No Evidence Why The Aid Was Withheld.

They asked about it, they expressed concern when they found out about the hold.

But everybody knows why they no longer care why the aid was withheld.

If they question it, they run afoul of President Trump.

And they are afraid to do that.

All the Republicans live in fear of being insulted on twitter by the President.

If the President goes against you, you are doomed in the Republican party. He rules by tweet.

Isn't it amazing the about-face turn-around the Republican Senate did on the Aid to Ukraine?

First they are for it, they approved it, they voted for it. Then, they were very concerned when it was withheld, very relieved when it was released.

And now they have an opportunity to vote to see evidence explaining exactly what happened, and they are turning it down.

No.

They don't want to see evidence.

Because Trump doesn't want them to.

Now, I ask you.

How many innocent individuals fight to keep evidence which might prove their innocence from being seen?

Innocent people don't do that. That's what GUILTY people do.

"Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell praised the Trump administration’s release of the funds, saying: “It would have been a mistake to hold back our assistance to the brave people of Ukraine. Doing so would have undermined our partners in Ukraine and Eastern Europe and further emboldened the Kremlin.”

It was one of several disputes recently between Trump and members of Congress, including some of his fellow Republicans as well as Democrats, over his administration’s decision to sidestep congressional approval to fund its own policy initiatives.

Lawmakers from both parties had said they expected Congress would pass legislation to reinstate the aid for Ukraine if the administration had not released the money. "

Reuters Sept 12 2019
 
“It would have been a mistake to hold back our assistance to the brave people of Ukraine. Doing so would have undermined our partners in Ukraine and Eastern Europe and further emboldened the Kremlin.”
nevermind it's a BAD IDEA to fight a proxy war on Russia's border -
the AID WAS RELEASED IN THE FISCAL YEAR
 
87 Senators Voted For Ukraine Aid, Objected to Halt, But Now They Want No Evidence Why The Aid Was Withheld.

They asked about it, they expressed concern when they found out about the hold.

But everybody knows why they no longer care why the aid was withheld.

If they question it, they run afoul of President Trump.

And they are afraid to do that.

All the Republicans live in fear of being insulted on twitter by the President.

If the President goes against you, you are doomed in the Republican party. He rules by tweet.

Isn't it amazing the about-face turn-around the Republican Senate did on the Aid to Ukraine?

First they are for it, they approved it, they voted for it. Then, they were very concerned when it was withheld, very relieved when it was released.

And now they have an opportunity to vote to see evidence explaining exactly what happened, and they are turning it down.

No.

They don't want to see evidence.

Because Trump doesn't want them to.

Now, I ask you.

How many innocent individuals fight to keep evidence which might prove their innocence from being seen?

Innocent people don't do that. That's what GUILTY people do.

"Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell praised the Trump administration’s release of the funds, saying: “It would have been a mistake to hold back our assistance to the brave people of Ukraine. Doing so would have undermined our partners in Ukraine and Eastern Europe and further emboldened the Kremlin.”

It was one of several disputes recently between Trump and members of Congress, including some of his fellow Republicans as well as Democrats, over his administration’s decision to sidestep congressional approval to fund its own policy initiatives.

Lawmakers from both parties had said they expected Congress would pass legislation to reinstate the aid for Ukraine if the administration had not released the money. "

Reuters Sept 12 2019

Executive privilege in national security matters, Snowflake.

Have a literate person explain it.
 
The "overwhelming " evidence by the House Democrats should suffice.

It is the duty of the Senate to evaluate that evidence, not produce it for the lazy Dems.
 
Hello anatta,



Why is it a bad idea to stand with an ally against a common adversary?

I just have one question!

Why are you trying to reason with ANATTA or EARL?

tenor.gif
 
87 Senators Voted For Ukraine Aid, Objected to Halt, But Now They Want No Evidence Why The Aid Was Withheld.

They asked about it, they expressed concern when they found out about the hold.

But everybody knows why they no longer care why the aid was withheld.

If they question it, they run afoul of President Trump.

And they are afraid to do that.

All the Republicans live in fear of being insulted on twitter by the President.

If the President goes against you, you are doomed in the Republican party. He rules by tweet.

Isn't it amazing the about-face turn-around the Republican Senate did on the Aid to Ukraine?

First they are for it, they approved it, they voted for it. Then, they were very concerned when it was withheld, very relieved when it was released.

And now they have an opportunity to vote to see evidence explaining exactly what happened, and they are turning it down.

No.

They don't want to see evidence.

Because Trump doesn't want them to.

Now, I ask you.

How many innocent individuals fight to keep evidence which might prove their innocence from being seen?

Innocent people don't do that. That's what GUILTY people do.

"Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell praised the Trump administration’s release of the funds, saying: “It would have been a mistake to hold back our assistance to the brave people of Ukraine. Doing so would have undermined our partners in Ukraine and Eastern Europe and further emboldened the Kremlin.”

It was one of several disputes recently between Trump and members of Congress, including some of his fellow Republicans as well as Democrats, over his administration’s decision to sidestep congressional approval to fund its own policy initiatives.

Lawmakers from both parties had said they expected Congress would pass legislation to reinstate the aid for Ukraine if the administration had not released the money. "

Reuters Sept 12 2019

Nice try sport but the so called evidence has been out there of months. You really must enjoying the Washington Big Top it's all smoke and mirrors.
 
Hello anatta,



Why is it a bad idea to stand with an ally against a common adversary?
Donbass is basically Russian with Russian lingua franca, and industrial/economic ties to Russia.
The population that lives there is overwhelmingly Russian.
Let them settle their own border - us providing lethal arms actually prolongs the war.

We have a NATO presence in the Black Sea -any "incident" is a trip wire to war
 
Usually you wait till a trial is complete before making a decision.
Not before it begins.

Not with this Democrat party. Trump was guilty before they even started the enquiry. Now lets make the evidence fit the crime. LOL
 
Hello Adolf_Twitler,

I just have one question!

Why are you trying to reason with ANATTA or EARL?

tenor.gif

Standing up for what is right means I only converse with one of them, and I am happy to dispute anti-Americanism even if it is presented in a civil manner.

Asking why we should come to the aid of an ally in a strategic location, which was voted on by an overwhelming majority of the Senate is like asking if we should care about our own country.

Which, apparently, Republicans place second behind their own party.

And that begs of the question: "What good is having party power in a nation whose power becomes subservient to dictator Putin?"
 
Hello Adolf_Twitler,



Standing up for what is right means I only converse with one of them, and I am happy to dispute anti-Americanism even if it is presented in a civil manner.

Asking why we should come to the aid of an ally in a strategic location, which was voted on by an overwhelming majority of the Senate is like asking if we should care about our own country.

Which, apparently, Republicans place second behind their own party.

And that begs of the question: "What good is having party power in a nation whose power becomes subservient to dictator Putin?"
detente with Russia is not "anti-Americanism" we had the same policy during the Cold War
 
Hello anatta,

Donbass is basically Russian with Russian lingua franca, and industrial/economic ties to Russia.
The population that lives there is overwhelmingly Russian.
Let them settle their own border - us providing lethal arms actually prolongs the war.

We have a NATO presence in the Black Sea -any "incident" is a trip wire to war

There were people who thought Alaska was basically Russian, too. Fortunately, most Americans think a 49 star flag would appear lacking.

It is notable that the things you advocate for are very good for Putin.
 
Hello anatta,

detente with Russia is not "anti-Americanism" we had the same policy during the Cold War

Handing over part of an ally goes unacceptably far beyond detente.

Besides fighting for Donbas, Crimea also needs to be properly reunited with Ukraine.
 
Hello anatta,



There were people who thought Alaska was basically Russian, too. Fortunately, most Americans think a 49 star flag would appear lacking.

It is notable that the things you advocate for are very good for Putin.
Alaska was PURCHASED by the USA, and the populace wasn't Russian like Donbass.
we didn't war for the territory.

It's "notable" you prefer a hot war to a Cold War, and eschew detente' as well .

You have good company. damn near every Dem has become warmongers, even after bitching about Iraq.
 
Back
Top