There will be not be even ONE word of exoneration!

Cinnabar

Verified User
If there is any lawyer or Senator of the corrupt GOP that actually presents any evidence that exonerates Trump list is here.

And for the benefit of the ignorant, "exonerate" means to present exculpatory evidence that negates the plethora of evidence and witnesses the Dems presented.

I guarantee there will be none!
 
Last edited:
If there is any lawyer or Senator of the corrupt GOP that actually presents any evidence that exonerates Trump list is here.

And for the benefit of the ignorant, "exonerate" means to present exculpatory evidence that negates the plethora of evidence and witnesses the Dems presented.

I guarantee there will be none!


HERE WE GO WITH THE SAME OL' BULLSHIT LEFTIST LIESPEAK.

THE INNOCENT DO NOT HAVE TO BE "EXONERATED"; THE GUILTY MUST BE CONVICTED.

THE DEFENSE HAS ALREADY PROVEN THAT THE STALIN-O-CRATS HAVE ZERO FACTUAL EVIDENCE...JUST HEARSAY, AND THEIR OWN MADEUP BULLSHIT ABOUT WHAT PRES.TRUMP and PRES.ZELENSKY WERE "REALLY THINKING"...:laugh:

GUESS WHAT AIN'T HAPPENING?
 
If there is any lawyer or Senator of the corrupt GOP that actually presents any evidence that exonerates Trump list is here.

And for the benefit of the ignorant, "exonerate" means to present exculpatory evidence that negates the plethora of evidence and witnesses the Dems presented.

I guarantee there will be none!

Lol, the exculpatory evidence is the transcript you idiot, it's irrefutable. You lose again.
 
HERE WE GO WITH THE SAME OL' BULLSHIT LEFTIST LIESPEAK.

THE INNOCENT DO NOT HAVE TO BE "EXONERATED"; THE GUILTY MUST BE CONVICTED.

THE DEFENSE HAS ALREADY PROVEN THAT THE STALIN-O-CRATS HAVE ZERO FACTUAL EVIDENCE...JUST HEARSAY, AND THEIR OWN MADEUP BULLSHIT ABOUT WHAT PRES.TRUMP and PRES.ZELENSKY WERE "REALLY THINKING"...:laugh:

GUESS WHAT AIN'T HAPPENING?

NOT EVEN ONE fact that exonerates!!!!! List it here or get lost.
 
The president does not have to prove his innocence. The corrupt Democrats have to prove his guilt.

Too many unforced errors by the prosecution and the case is too weak.

Not guilty and full exoneration in the Senate.

Count on it.
 
Lol, the exculpatory evidence is the transcript you idiot, it's irrefutable. You lose again.

There was no actual transcript turned over and you know that. :rolleyes:
The White House’s version of the call is not the transcript.

Not even one piece of evidence of exoneration.
 
NOT EVEN ONE fact that exonerates!!!!! List it here or get lost.

Uh the FACT that NOT ONE PROOF OF ANYTHING CLOSE TO AN ACTUAL CRIME, OR "IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE" HAS BEEN PRESENTED.

AS I SAID....THE PRESIDENT DOES NOT NEED TO BE "EXONERATED"; THE DUNCE-O-CRATS NEED TO PROVE THEIR CASE...AND HEARSAY AIN'T GONNA DO IT.

AMERICANS ARE ALREADY COMPLETELY TURNED OFF/SICK OF BY THE SCHIFF/SCHUMER SHAM SHOW....SEEN YOUR TV RATINGS....?


WHEN SCHIFF-FOR-BRAINS TRIED TO INSERT THE RUSSIA LIE...AGAIN....WHAT AN IDIOT.....


THINK "BLACK HOLE"....
:rofl2:
 
If Darth Omar had been advising her, he would have told her weeks ago, as he did this forum, that censure might pass. This would have saved face, and avoided an embarrassing defeat in the Senate, as I believe will happen as early as next week.

She did indeed let the squad and the lunatics on the left of her party buffalo her.
 
I do believe that the president's lawyers have made a compelling case that the House's impeachment Articles were done in violation of the Constitution. A House committee had no authority to vote on the start of an impeachment inquiry. The lawyer cited a Supreme Court decision ruling that the "House" is the full House, not a committee.

The impeachment should be declared null and void and since the Democrats will never show an ounce of integrity, the Republicans should do so when they control the House...soon, hopefully.
 
"I know of no Republican senator who has been threatened in any way by anyone in the administration."
— Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine

They just lost the only Senator who might have voted guilty.

Unforced errors, they always get you.
 
" "NOT GUILTY" = "EXONERATED". PERIOD.


LEARN ENGLISH, AND SAVE YOUR SILLIASS "WORD GAMES" FOR YOUR FELLOW LEFTIDIOTS..
 
Not even one piece of evidence of exoneration.
And not one piece of evidence of guilt. Sounds vaguely familiar. Was that the Mueller "investigation"? Which by the way was about collusion which isn't even a crime.
Which by the way, there is no accusation of an actual crime in this impeachment.
Dims might have better luck getting a senate conviction of jaywalking if trump actually did it of course.
 
when is the last time a prosecutor said " you are exonerated" ? like never.
I think the Senate votes ya or nay - to the articles, which is a "not guilty" ( legal exoneration)
 
Lol, the exculpatory evidence is the transcript you idiot, it's irrefutable. You lose again.

Yep. Irrefutable, all right. The extortion attempt is right there.

"Well it is very nice of you to say that. I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it's something that you should really ask them about. When I was speaking to Angela Merkel she talks Ukraine, but she ·doesn't do anything. A lot of the European countries are the same way so I think it's something you want to look at but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn't say that it's reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.

I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you're surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it's very important that you do it if that's possible.

Good because I heard you had a prosecutor who was very good and he was shut down and that's really unfair. A lot of people are talking about that, the way they shut your very good prosecutor down and you had some very bad people involved. Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the mayor of New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General. Rudy very much knows what's happening and he is a very capable guy. If you could speak to him that would be great. The former ambassador from the United States, the woman, was bad news and the people she was dealing with in the Ukraine were bad news so I just want to let you know that. The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me.

Well, she's going to go through some things. I will have Mr. Giuliani give you a call and I am also going to have Attorney General Barr call and we will get to the bottom of it. I'm sure you will figure it out. I heard the prosecutor was treated very badly and he was a very fair prosecutor so good luck with everything. Your economy is going to get better and better I predict. You have a lot of assets. It's a great country. I have many Ukrainian friends, their incredible people."
 
I do believe that the president's lawyers have made a compelling case that the House's impeachment Articles were done in violation of the Constitution. A House committee had no authority to vote on the start of an impeachment inquiry. The lawyer cited a Supreme Court decision ruling that the "House" is the full House, not a committee.

The impeachment should be declared null and void and since the Democrats will never show an ounce of integrity, the Republicans should do so when they control the House...soon, hopefully.

The impeachment is in the books, stupid fuck. And there's not a goddam thing you can do about it.
 
Back
Top