51 - 49

Jack said:
The Case was made with the Transcript 'Do me a Favor'. Everything else was just frosting on the Cake.
Bolton is a staunch Republican, we'll see what he has to say.
Click to expand...
I guess you can buy the book....
 
Jack said:
The Case was made with the Transcript 'Do me a Favor'. Everything else was just frosting on the Cake.
Bolton is a staunch Republican, we'll see what he has to say.
Click to expand...
I guess you can buy the book....
 
Originally Posted by Eagle-Eye
Answer my question Jack, Your side had 17 witnesses and still couldn't build a credible case


This is simply a function of you being a biased juror. I am a litigating attorney with 30 plus years trying cases.
This case was not only compelling IT WAS UNOPPOSED. Were I the lawyer instead of Schiff, my argument would
have been, in addition to all his arguments, is that "we have the only evidence." "You cannot not convict."

They in effect have made a demurrer at trial or motion for nonsuit, which also is laughable. The fact is this trial was
a public sham and fraud and your side doesn't care.

Look me in the eye gomer, I agree with you on many political issues. I depart from the far left on just about fucking
everything. But I am a lawyer and I care VERY DEARLY about the rule of law, that this nation is a nation of laws and not
men. Your party has made this a nation of men. A corrupt shithole no better than Nigeria. You evil fuckers will fucking pay.

Let me know if you have a GOD DAMNED FUCKING SOUL and understand what I have written.

I don't want terrorists, I don't want illegal immigration, I don't want a stalled economy. But I INSIST ON RULE OF LAW,
and you evil fuckers are totally corrupt in our faces and don't care that you are pissing on George Washington
 
ImpeachmentByTheNumbers-927x1024.jpg
 
Jack said:
The Case was made with the Transcript 'Do me a Favor'. Everything else was just frosting on the Cake.
Bolton is a staunch Republican, we'll see what he has to say.
Click to expand...

Funny Bolton was hated by the Democrats but now because you think he has dirt he is now a favorite son. LOL
 
Eagle-Eye said:
Funny Bolton was hated by the Democrats but now because you think he has dirt he is now a favorite son. LOL
Click to expand...

LOL. You can disagree with his 'politics' (he is a Republican by the way) but can still appreciate his witness to illegal events ... Bolton called it a 'Drug Deal'.
 
Embarrassed American said:
Innocent until proven guilty always follows with a trial with witnesses. So far we don't have innocent until proven guilty, we have innocent until the cows come home. Why? Because the whole context of proven in proven guilty his been disallowed. We didn't have a trial we had a floor show. Now we get to wait for the ball to drop on the ratings of said performance going into the election year.
Click to expand...

Untrue; because it holds true to everyone.
 
Jack said:
LOL. You can disagree with his 'politics' (he is a Republican by the way) but can still appreciate his witness to illegal events ... Bolton called it a 'Drug Deal'.
Click to expand...

Trump fired Bolton thus he clearly has no ax to grind with Trump therefore every word he says has to be true. If you believe that you're a bigger fool than Pelosi is.
 
Jack said:
LOL. You can disagree with his 'politics' (he is a Republican by the way) but can still appreciate his witness to illegal events ... Bolton called it a 'Drug Deal'.
Click to expand...

In other words, you're admitting someone is credible based on whether or not you like what they say at the time rather than the person him/herself
 
Eagle-Eye said:
Trump fired Bolton thus he clearly has no ax to grind with Trump therefore every word he says has to be true. If you believe that you're a bigger fool than Pelosi is.
Click to expand...

Moscow Mitch could have let Bolton testify and we all could have determined if he was being truthful.
 
Walt said:
Dershowitz is the only one who believes that. The Founding Fathers specifically stated no emoluments, but Dershowitz is sure the Constitution is wrong. He says that as long as the president can claim that by accepting a bribe, he is helping America indirectly, it is all good.

So trump could accept a bribe, and say that it helped him pay for lunch, which made him a better leader of America. trump could murder Biden, and claim that helped trump stay in power, which he could claim he thought was better for America.
Click to expand...

straw man.......Trump accepted no bribes.......
 
Nordberg said:
In the Senate, there were zero witnesses. Not 17, but zero.
Click to expand...

you should have watched the Senate coverage.......the demmycunts showed video of all the testimony they wanted the senators to hear......of course, the senators all watched the coverage of the House proceedings so they had heard it all before.......its silly to pretend there's some evidence out there that the senate didn't hear........
 
Micawber said:
These types of spelling and lexical errors are so common among the red rabble I usually let them go, unless I'm dealing with a huge jerk, (e.g. "judgment" with the superfluous e also common.) I say if they can manage to stumble through a string of symbolic logic to cobble together an even plausibly rational thought then de minimus non curat lex.

I punish mal intent. That captures about 99%, sadly.
Click to expand...

I'm surprised you can spell at all after three years with a penis in your ear.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top