AL LAW, MEN 50+ or having fathered 3 biological kids--MANDATORY VASECTOMIES....

Uh oh, lawmakers are coming after 'your' MANHOOD now. It was one thing when it was the 'girls', now it's serious! Not to worry, a 'GIRL' introduced it. A DEMOCRAT. Besides the ONLY way this would ever even make it to conference, and it likely would--if it was RACE specific.


[FONT=&]Ted Cruz takes aim at Alabama vasectomy bill: 'Yikes'

[FONT=&]BY ARIS FOLLEY - 02/16/20 07:23 PM EST[/FONT] 2,755
[/FONT]


​
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) took aim at legislation recently introduced in Alabama by a state representative that would, if passed, make it mandatory for certain men to get vasectomies – a bill that comes in response to legislation passed last year that seeks to ban abortion in the state.

“Yikes,” Cruz wrote in response to the bill on Twitter on Sunday morning. “A government big enough to give you everything is big enough to take everything...literally!”

Cruz was referring to legislation introduced by Alabama state Rep. Rolanda Hollis (D) last week that would, if passed, require men over the age of 50 in the state to get vasectomies as well as men who have had at least three biological children.
[FONT=&][FONT=&][FONT=&]
Cruz’s tweet, which has racked up over 14,000 likes in hours, received even more comments from critics who felt his response proved Hollis’ point behind the measure.

[/FONT]​[/FONT]
[/FONT][FONT=&]“Under existing law, there are no restrictions on the reproductive rights of men,” a synopsis for Hollis' [/FONT]bill states[FONT=&]. "This bill would require a man to undergo a vasectomy within one month of his 50th birthday or the birth of his third biological child, whichever comes first."[/FONT][FONT=&]In an interview with AL.com last week, Hollis said that the legislation comes in response to a law passed in the state last year that seeks to make abortion illegal almost all case, including in instances of rape or incest. The bill has not yet taken effect after being blocked in court.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]“The vasectomy bill is to help with the reproductive system, and yes, it is to neutralize the abortion ban bill ... it always takes two to tango," she told the outlet.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]“We can’t put all the responsibility on women. Men need to be responsible also,” she also said...[/FONT]


https://thehill.com/homenews/senate...bama-bill-requiring-men-get-vasectomies-at-50

I agree...LEFT WING FASCISM is a clear and present danger. Ted Cruz …..the conservative constitutionalist....takes aim at a piece of fascist legislation presented by "D" Hollis? :thinking:
 
The republican part would support this law


IF

it only applied to brown men

Yeah.....Ted Cruz (Cuban heritage)….WOULD, IF......why do all leftists attempt to use STRAW ARGUMENTS concerning the would'a, could'a, should'a made up hypothetical. You are attempting to argue about an event that has never happened..it exist ONLY BETWEEN YOUR EARS...its not part nor lot of REALITY. You project Republicans as the evil when its is a left wing fascist democrat that wants to control the human body.....(directly in contradiction to the abortion argument....where everyone is in control of their own bodies)….but its ok with MEN?

Idiots.

That FLESH inside a female body? Its called a CHILD, a BABY. That sperm? Its useless as conception is impossible void of a female egg.

Why not just Castrate all undesirable males? :bigthink: Evil is as evil does. Only an idiot leftist would present objective evidence against a leftist politician and then attempt to blame a republican for a democrat fascist policy.
 
I can see where lib'ruls are coming from in saying no woman should be allowed to give consent to having a fourth child, since she would obviously not be of sound mind.......but if he gets a divorce and remarries, can he have three children with the second wife if she gives consent?.......
 
if the flesh inside women's bodies can be legislated


then SPERM can be legislated


turn off that spigot


it will make for fewer abortions huh assholes

Screw you, the woman is the only one with the life or death decision regarding what is legally the mans child also, you stupid mewling quim! It does take two to tango, but only one of those people gets to decide life or death of that child, that is unequal protection under the law! How many abortions have you had baby killer
 
its your party and trumpy who want to starve and leave bleeding on the street people without money


they cut all help programs with fucking glee

even the ones FEEDING Hungry pregnant women and children

that is the abortion plan the republicans love


starve the hungry pregnant woman until she spontaneously aborts

All right that is it, yours is the party that wants to kill babies, and allow illegals to run rampant receiving federal assistance and driver licenses, while vets, and American families starve and live on the streets, you ignorant stupid bitch! Just hoping, somehow, some of them can find a way to vote and give you power!
 
Screw you, the woman is the only one with the life or death decision regarding what is legally the mans child also, you stupid mewling quim! It does take two to tango, but only one of those people gets to decide life or death of that child, that is unequal protection under the law! How many abortions have you had baby killer

It does take two to tango. However, unless it's rape, the man can't do the "tango" with her without her consent.
 
Or at the very least...castration.

Back to the issue at hand. Would you be in favor of vasectomies for rapists, given that the victim is forced to have the rape baby?

He's stated what he believes should happen. Why do you keep asking a question that is irrelevant? If you want to give someone that should be executed a vasectomy after the execution, sure, why not. That would be on the same stupid level as charging someone with a crime after they commit suicide.
 
Or at the very least...castration.

Back to the issue at hand. Would you be in favor of vasectomies for rapists, given that the victim is forced to have the rape baby?

Vasectomies would not prevent rape! Castration? it is said that does not take away the urge from pedophiles and rapists are no better! Death penalty!
 
So you don't believe women should be forced to deliver rape babies?

That is the question isn't it, the child did nothing wrong and the woman having it and raising it to be a productive member of Society, would be the best option! I will admit I struggle with that one!
 
Which proves the legislator behind the bill is an idiot.

She's elected from a district that is 77% black. Nothing like having a built in majority.

I understand, the communities she comes from are the ones with the biggest problem!
 
Back
Top