Whatever loser.
I have been an outside consultant on hiring. It was almost entirely masters degree or higher candidates. I have no experience with blue collar hiring.
Not really. Ethnicity is a fun thing to talk about at work, like maybe the weather, but not an essential part of work, or getting a job. For a while there I had only one job, where citizenship was important. Now I am diversifying again, and will be hiring out to subcontractors who are not in the USA.
Which engineering discipline, Walter?
What is the derivative of tanx, Walter? Second year calc, Walter.
And that ain't a moderate growth ... that's barely keeping up with inflation ... or stagnant ... 0bama said get used to it.
I don’t wish to be rude, Walter but that’s ...h o r s e. m i e r d a.
You may have done trig in high school and solid geometry but not calc., or trigonometric identifies, Walter and it was Calc ll.Computer Engineering. I have not done much hardware work since my undergraduate years. I mostly do computer programming, or if I am feeling fancy, software engineering. Actually, it gets kind of strange, because much of the computer programming I have been doing recently might have been considered hardware a few decades ago. I have been doing a lot of work with FPGA's, which is a chip that you can reconfigure (with software) to be any sort of digital circuit you want. Where a normal CPU core can do just one thing at a time, an FPGA can do everything at once.
1/(cos^2(x)). It goes to 1 at 0, to infinity at pi/2, to 1 at pi, and on and on. I honestly have not thought about that in 30 years. I think it is earlier than the second year calc. I think I did calc with trig my senior year of HS, but am not sure.
If the president had used military action in the islands that China is building, the left would have called him a brutal warmonger.
If only we had some sort of "deal maker" in the white house who could figure out a way to make a deal that is short of war...
First off, GDP growth is adjusted for inflation. So 2% growth is 2% above inflation. That is moderate growth, and not stagnation. Inflation was below target inflation of 2%, so was not much of an issue beyond that.
trump was not doing better. It cannot be "booming" for an orange president, but stagnant for a black President.
You may have done trig in high school and solid geometry but not calc., or trigonometric identifies, Walter and it was Calc ll.
Losers don't retire at the age of 58.
the investments will carry me until I'm 62 when my retirement plans take over.
You "consulted" hiring Drs? That is fascinating, do tell us more.
You may have done trig in high school and solid geometry but not calc., or trigonometric identifies, Walter and it was Calc ll.
Or differential equations. My son calls them difi difi equations (difficult differential equations).In all honesty I have to come to walt's defense here ... I'm an engineer and I couldn't answer 1st year calc problems much less calc II.
Haven used it since I left school.
Look at any gdp chart and you will see a flat area where the 0bama years are ... 1-2% growth ... the new normal.
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/gdp-growth-rateU.S. gdp growth rate for 2015 was 2.88%
trump believes he can control oil prices when they're low...blames others when they're high.No, I meant any president.
De nada.
That is just wrong. '16Q4 GDP growth was 2%, and '17Q1 growth was 2.3%. '16Q2 was 1.9%, but that was not when Obama left office. It all averaged out to the low 2's. There were much lower numbers ('14Q1 was -1.1%), but also much higher numbers ('14Q2 was 5.5%, and '14Q3 was 5%). And, it all averaged out to the low 2's.
trump continued in the low 2's.
We have not seen higher than 3% growth in wages "per annum" since Clinton was President. Could you mean "annualized"? You would be correct if you said that. We did see a few months that if they were annualized, they would be in the low 3's.
Lets start at the beginning. Obama lowered unemployment greatly. That did not lead to the massive wage growth that economists would expect. Wage growth stayed close to GDP growth, in the low 2's, so did not cause inflation. trump did lower unemployment a bit more, not the massive amount you claim, and wages did start ticking up above economic growth. It was averaging in the high 2's, not above 3% as you claim. The Fed was beginning to become worried about inflation.
But there were also odd problems. No one had ever heard of all the companies on the S&P 500 running out of cash on hand at the same time. The Fed printing money to fill that gap meant that they were going to have to raise the prime rate to keep inflation from getting out of hand. That meant a recession was coming.
I hope this all helps you understand the last decade of economics.
I got a 5 on the AP Calc BC test. I also got a 5 on AP Physics and AP Computer. I remember there was an interesting question on mirroring a binary tree on the AP Computer test that could elegantly be done with a recursive procedure.
Colleges usually would not have yearly courses, so wouldn't Calc II be the second quarter or trimester, not the second year?
In all honesty I have to come to walt's defense here ... I'm an engineer and I couldn't answer 1st year calc problems much less calc II.
Haven't used it since I left school.
trump believes he can control oil prices when they're low...blames others when they're high.