Into the Night
Contributor
Extreme poverty, might cause theft, but our kind of poverty, doesn't cause drive by shootings..
Poverty does not cause drive by shootings. Bigotry.
Extreme poverty, might cause theft, but our kind of poverty, doesn't cause drive by shootings..
Racism. Define 'middle class'. Define 'black'.
Poverty does not cause drive by shootings. Bigotry.
So we were told the virus itself maybe racist for killing more blacks perportionantly to other races. Or that treatment of said blacks was racist and also the culprate.
Or hmm, maybe its because black communities ignore the social distancing rules?
Here's 1,000 blacks throwing a house party during the coronavirus pandemic?
Maybe its personal choice, and not racism?
https://www.tmz.com/2020/04/26/1-00...w_POsx3GbUImRPQvQ63i9OY_ksqybTaba_aJCCl6fPZ-A
Must be fake news. No one else has reported such a party existed. And the News source is known for misleading shock-Jock sarcastic irresponsible politically motivated reporting.
There is not an Apartment in the world that could hold 1,000 guests, nor would any apartment allow for that much guest parking.
Not only that, the neighbors would have complained, the police would have come and sent everyone packing.
I am not saying that some people are not following the staying at home and distancing rules, but this story is simply BULLSHIT!
Next fabrication please!
That doesn't mean much, the Globalist media are very protective of Blacks, even if they see nothing wrong with peddling anti-Italian bigotry like MTV's Jersey Shore, or Mafia TV shows galore like Mob Housewives, Sopranos, or Growing up Gotti, or bigotry against Poles, like dumb Polak jokes told on TV, or TV shows portraying Poles as goofs like Ignatowski on Taxi, or Elka Ostraski on hot in Cleveland, or the goofy family on Malcom in the Middle is Polish.
ROFLMAO. Dude, you are soooo goofy. It'd be funny if you were spreading the same hate you're bitching about.
I can't think of anything goofier, than someone pretending to be against bigotry, but being bigoted against Poles.
Then again, Western Europeans in general are just as goofy.
Going nuts looting & shooting other races & countries in Racial Genocide.
Now, do a 180.
Start going nuts letting other races looting & shooting their own countries in Racial Suicide.
Something's not quite right about you people.
ROFLMAO. Yup, you're goofy alright.![]()
You should know that when you keep ranting like that it just makes you equally nuts and as bigoted as TTQ64 or Truth Detector.So, says the goofy Westerners who cheer on their extinction via Balkanized Multiculturalism.
His work was banned by the Catholic church too. Many of his followers were also tortured or put under threat of torture by the same Catholic church.Catholic clergy has been pretty kick @$$ in science.
- Copernicus a Polish Catholic clergyman behind the Heliocentric model,
Which one? The one in ancient Greece? The one that Galileo caused? The one that Newton caused? or the one that Einstein caused?widely considered the start of the Scientific Revolution,
Nope. He wasn't around when the concept of money was created, and had nothing to do with that creation of that concept, which took place in 700BC in Lydia. There is evidence that money has been used as early as 5000BC.he also founded Modern economics with the Quantity Theory of Money,
Nope. Gresham (not Gershim) created Greham's law. That's why it's called Gresham's law. It is also not science.and Gersham's Law.
Nope. Michael Faraday created the first electric motor. He was Presbyterian, an offshoot of Lutheranism.- Gregor Mendel a Austrian Catholic friar behind genetic inheritance.
- Anyos Jedlik the Hungarian Catholic priest behind the invention of the first Electric motors.
The Big Bang theory is not science. It is not falsifiable. You DO seem to have a big problem with this. This theory, and it's religion, is in direct conflict with another theory, and religion, known as the the Theory of the Continuum.- Georges Lemaître a Belgian Catholic priest behind the Big Bang Theory.
Nope. The ancient Greeks had that. It was they that first proposed the idea of matter being made up of atoms. You should study what Boskovich did that later contributed to actual science, though what he did was not science itself.- Roger Joseph Boscovich Croat Catholic priest behind the prototype of Atomic Theory.
Nope. Roger Bacon tried to prove God as science by using supporting evidence. Science does not use supporting evidence. See the philosophies of Karl Popper as a place to begin to understand why.- Roger Bacon an English Catholic Friar behind Empiricism through Nature.
An observation is not a theory of science. It has nothing to do with science. All observations are subject to the problems of phenomenology. No theory of science contains an observation.- Pierre Gassendi a French Catholic priest behind the transit of Mercury.
There were two inventors of lightning rods: Ben Franklin in the United States, which argued the rod should be pointed, and Michael Faraday, in the UK, which argued the rod should be blunt. Franklin was correct. Faraday was wrong on this issue, but the government order the use of Faraday's design on lightning rods. This is why you so so many lightning rods with the little balls on them in the UK.- Prokop Diviš a Czech canon clergy behind the invention of the Lightning Rod.
Nope. Galileo did that. See his book 'The Starry Messenger'.- Alexius Sylvius Polonus a Polish Catholic clergy who discovered sun spots.
Nope. Isaac Newton created the Theory of Universal Gravitation, which states: F=-G*(m1+m2)/r^2, where he referred to Galileo's discovery of constant acceleration as a 'gravitational constant'. See his book 'The Principia'. Henry Cavendish measured this constant and indirectly weighed the entire Earth along with it.- Francesco Maria Grimald an Italian Catholic priest behind gravitational constant.
Algebra is not a proof. It is a branch of mathematics, established by many proofs over the years, and involving many people. Mathematics is not science.- Bernard Bolzano an Italian Catholic priest proving Algebra.
Bee keeping is not a theory of science.- Jan Dzierżon a Polish Catholic priest the founder of modern Bee-Keeping
You should know that when you keep ranting like that it just makes you equally nuts and as bigoted as TTQ64 or Truth Detector.
You are far too dumb to grasp bigotry, you are just one of those really stupid Western European savages.
No relation whatsoever.Being of modest income isn't necessarily very predictive of unhappiness.
It is quite possible to be very poor and not starve, and to even be very happy.Starving is a different story.
Spoken like a socialist. Typical arrogant student. Did you know that wealth is what BUILT the school you attend? Also the apartment you live in. Define 'extreme wealth'.While, there is minimal impacts of modest vs middle income people being slightly happier, there's no evidence that extreme wealth ever builds more happiness.
Abuse doesn't build happiness.Abuse, Social connections, and coping skills are far more conclusive in building happiness.
Racism. Ignored. You really have to get a handle on this fallacy. You are often falling into compositional errors involving people as the class, resulting in bigotry and racism. A compositional error is in and of itself a fallacy.Whites probably aren't a whole lot happier in the USA, than Blacks, and the proof is that Whites have much higher suicide rates.
Blacks might be more inclined to be abused, and come from single mother households, or family disturbances, but they naturally are very extroverted, sociable, have large extended families of support networks, and tend to be uppity, known for dancing, and coping with music, and block parties.
Whites on the other hand in this country, are more isolated, living often in the woods.
Bigotry.Half of that, is probably because a lot more people in poverty are mentally ill, or borderline mentally ill in the first place.
Mental illness has nothing to do with how happy one is.Mental illness tends to make people unhappy, and it's far harder for anyone with a mental illness to get ahead.
Psychoquackery.Although, none the less, most of our best & brightest coincidentally also have a disproportionate amount of mental ailments, like Aspergers, OCD, ADHD, Bi Polar, Tourettes syndrome, Depressive disorders, etc. etc.
Throwing a house party is dumb right now, I don't care what color you are. Of course I did not fact check so I don't know if the OP is even true.
His work was banned by the Catholic church too. Many of his followers were also tortured or put under threat of torture by the same Catholic church.
Which one? The one in ancient Greece? The one that Galileo caused? The one that Newton caused? or the one that Einstein caused?
Nope. He wasn't around when the concept of money was created, and had nothing to do with that creation of that concept, which took place in 700BC in Lydia. There is evidence that money has been used as early as 5000BC.
Nope. Gresham (not Gershim) created Greham's law. That's why it's called Gresham's law. It is also not science.
Nope. Michael Faraday created the first electric motor. He was Presbyterian, an offshoot of Lutheranism.
The Big Bang theory is not science. It is not falsifiable. You DO seem to have a big problem with this. This theory, and it's religion, is in direct conflict with another theory, and religion, known as the the Theory of the Continuum.
Nope. The ancient Greeks had that. It was they that first proposed the idea of matter being made up of atoms. You should study what Boskovich did that later contributed to actual science, though what he did was not science itself.
Nope. Roger Bacon tried to prove God as science by using supporting evidence. Science does not use supporting evidence. See the philosophies of Karl Popper as a place to begin to understand why.
An observation is not a theory of science. It has nothing to do with science. All observations are subject to the problems of phenomenology. No theory of science contains an observation.
There were two inventors of lightning rods: Ben Franklin in the United States, which argued the rod should be pointed, and Michael Faraday, in the UK, which argued the rod should be blunt. Franklin was correct. Faraday was wrong on this issue, but the government order the use of Faraday's design on lightning rods. This is why you so so many lightning rods with the little balls on them in the UK.
Nope. Galileo did that. See his book 'The Starry Messenger'.
Nope. Isaac Newton created the Theory of Universal Gravitation, which states: F=-G*(m1+m2)/r^2, where he referred to Galileo's discovery of constant acceleration as a 'gravitational constant'. See his book 'The Principia'. Henry Cavendish measured this constant and indirectly weighed the entire Earth along with it.
Algebra is not a proof. It is a branch of mathematics, established by many proofs over the years, and involving many people. Mathematics is not science.
Bee keeping is not a theory of science.
Your revisionism of history seems to be a common theme with you.
...Mental illness has nothing to do with how happy one is....
No relation whatsoever.
It is quite possible to be very poor and not starve, and to even be very happy.
Spoken like a socialist. Typical arrogant student. Did you know that wealth is what BUILT the school you attend? Also the apartment you live in. Define 'extreme wealth'.
Abuse doesn't build happiness.
Racism. Ignored. You really have to get a handle on this fallacy. You are often falling into compositional errors involving people as the class, resulting in bigotry and racism. A compositional error is in and of itself a fallacy.
Bigotry.
Mental illness has nothing to do with how happy one is.
Psychoquackery.