1,000 black people through giant house party in Chicago!

Into the Night said:
You effectively did. You are just lying now.

Anyone who wants to be can be a business worker.

Anyone who wants to be can be a business owner.

Anyone who wants to be can be a business owner.
Businesses are also consumers.

Argument by repetition fallacy.
Click to expand...

No, limits of the market demand limits the amount of businesses there can be.
On the other side of the same coin, the need for business employees means there won't be just businesses, but also employees.

It's amazing that those who promote Capitalism the most, seem to understand it the least.
 
WitoldPilecki said:
If the IQ gap is the same when Blacks & Whites are adopted, then when Blacks & Whites aren't adopted, then it's obviously a highly genetic gap.
Click to expand...
There is no such thing as an 'IQ gap'. Random numbers don't have a gap.
WitoldPilecki said:
You clearly don't know what you're talking about.
Click to expand...
Inversion fallacy.
WitoldPilecki said:
First off Scarr & Weinberg created the study to try & prove racial equality.
Click to expand...
Irrelevance fallacy.
WitoldPilecki said:
They obviously failed that objective, because anyone with a brain can see they didn't prove anything other than genetic inheritance being the major factor between the Black & White IQ gap.
Click to expand...
Racism. Define "White'. Define 'Black'. False dichotomy fallacy.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
True, I am not "The Consensus", I'm just part of it. Take your own poll then we can compare results.

Let's start with the Theory of Evolution.
Click to expand...

Not a theory of science. It is not falsifiable. This theory states that present day life evolved from more primitive life. The only way to test this theory is to go back in time an look to see what actually happened. The theory remains a circular argument, and because of it's extending arguments, a religion.
 
WitoldPilecki said:
You are awfully biased & dumb.

Every source I've seen shows the Polish team from Kielce won.

On top of a anti-Catholic bigot, I think you're also an anti-Polish bigot.
Click to expand...

Your sources are biased.

I have no problem with Poles. A good friend of mine is Polish. An excellent mechanical engineer.
I have no problem with most Catholics. I don't agree with their religion, and some Catholics are fundamentalists, but otherwise I have no problem with them. You forget I named several Catholic scientists. I also named several Christian scientists (some Protestant, some Catholic, etc.).

Apparently you have a short memory as well.
 
Into the Night said:
Your sources are biased.

I have no problem with Poles. A good friend of mine is Polish. An excellent mechanical engineer.
I have no problem with most Catholics. I don't agree with their religion, and some Catholics are fundamentalists, but otherwise I have no problem with them. You forget I named several Catholic scientists. I also named several Christian scientists (some Protestant, some Catholic, etc.).

Apparently you have a short memory as well.
Click to expand...

You are biased, not the sources.
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
I suppose the 40 million that Harvard Law school took in the recent bailout is more your style of Welfare huh TRUMPTARD?

You are just another Welfare-On-The-Brain nimcompute HYPOCRITE SON-OF-A-BITCH!

Get a life dude!
Click to expand...

No, why would I want a communist institution like Harvard to get 40 mil from fed govt?
 
WitoldPilecki said:
The IQ scores are listed, Adopted Whites had an IQ score 101, White - Black mixes a 93 IQ, and Blacks a 83 IQ.

You tell me what that means?
Click to expand...
Nothing.
WitoldPilecki said:
That it's not really environment, or culture, but absolutely a highly genetic gap.
Click to expand...
Racism.
WitoldPilecki said:
Especially, considering the White - Black mixed race one, was intermediate.
Click to expand...
Racism.
WitoldPilecki said:
It's not my fault, you can't grasp reality.
Click to expand...
Define 'real. Buzzword fallacy.
 
WitoldPilecki said:
So, you're too dumb to think for yourself?...
Click to expand...

Translation: I can't quote the link because I'm pulling off talking points from a racist forum and pulling the rest out of my fat ass.

Don't worry, kid. I knew you couldn't do it because I have very low expectations of you....so far, you've never failed me. :)
 
Into the Night said:
Not a theory of science. It is not falsifiable. This theory states that present day life evolved from more primitive life. The only way to test this theory is to go back in time an look to see what actually happened. The theory remains a circular argument, and because of it's extending arguments, a religion.
Click to expand...

QED. Thanks!
 
WitoldPilecki said:
No, limits of the market demand limits the amount of businesses there can be.
On the other side of the same coin, the need for business employees means there won't be just businesses, but also employees.
It's amazing that those who promote Capitalism the most, seem to understand it the least.
Click to expand...

You are just repeating yourself. You are just chanting. I already have a list of numbered mantras that people like you tend to use. They are all based on logical fallacies, rendering the argument invalid.
Mantras 25a...29...16b...22
(one can see the list at https://politiplex.freeforums.net/thread/59/nights-numbered-mantra-list.)
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Translation: I can't quote the link because I'm pulling off talking points from a racist forum and pulling the rest out of my fat ass.

Don't worry, kid. I knew you couldn't do it because I have very low expectations of you....so far, you've never failed me. :)
Click to expand...

I feel sorry for such a thoughtless savage like yourself.

Who can't compute simple IQ scores, with logic or abstract thought.

I truly do believe it, you are equal to the Negroids, that's why you don't think otherwise.

PS.

There's a lot of people much smarter than you, who have stated the study proves genes.

https://psychology.wikia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study

Both Levin (1994) and Lynn (1994) disputed the environment only interpretation. Each argued that the data clearly supports a hereditarian alternative: that the mean IQ scores and school achievement of each group reflected their degree of African ancestry. For all measures, the children with two Black parents scored lower than the children with one Black and White parent, who in turn scored lower than the adopted children with two White parents.

Waldman, Weinberg, and Scarr (1994) responded to Levin (1994) and Lynn (1994). They argued that preadoption factors confounded racial ancestry, preventing an unambiguous interpretation of the results. Subsequently, Jensen (1998) examined these studies and reviewed the evidence that adoption does not affect children's IQ scores after age 7.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top