Ahmaud Arbery shooting

Well, Legion, may we reasonably say that the moron was hoisted on his own petard?

I think we can reasonably say that.
 
Nope. In some states it is a felony. I made an assumption, and I corrected my mistake. Something you don't EVER do. Because I'm a bigger man than you are. Pretty simple stuff.

No, you are not a bigger man, you are a pussy who lies, moron.
 
Florida for one, which was the one I based my assumption on.

Can you cite the statute?

You want a list, go get it yourself.

You made the claim. The burden of proof is on you.

I know trolls don't like hearing this, but if you make the claim, it's up to you to prove it.

You made the claim, it’s yours to defend. Another who doesn’t backup their statements, thanks.
 
In pretty much any civilized nation anywhere the two genetic defectives involved in this shooting would be in jail awaiting trial. In a case strikingly similar to the Zimmerman case a young man jogging was confronted, shot and killed by these two Bubbas.

There’s even a cell phone recording of the killing. What has many outraged is why aren’t the McMichael father and son in jail waiting trial for murder. I would also like to know how the he’ll anyone could argue a stand your ground case or even self defense when it’s obvious that the six toed duo were the aggressors here?

It also makes me wonder if McMichael Jr. will replace Zimmerman as Grinds new stud muffin?

https://abc13.com/man-jogging-georgia-shooting-arbery-in/6156175/

Would you mind explaining exactly HOW this case is "strikingly similar to the Zimmerman case"?

Because based on my admittedly limited knowledge of the Arbery case, aside from the fact that the dead man was black and the shooter wasn't, I see NO SIMILARITY WHATSOEVER.

Inasmuch as I have found that most people who expound on the Zimmerman case are woefully misinformed, I eagerly await your response.
 
Well, Legion, may we reasonably say that the moron was hoisted on his own petard?

I think we can reasonably say that.

Once the facts are presented to the grand jury, the two men may well be indicted, Earl.

They would then be arrested, prosecuted and tried. Their guilt or innocence would be established in a court of law, not by emotional; liberals on a website who seem to assume that white men are automatically murderers if they kill a man with Black skin.
 
Let's stick to what we know and what we can prove. Speculation is fruitless as grounds for conclusion.

Perhaps the moron will tell us if his home is a gun free zone.

Of course he lies so...
 
Last edited:
Once the facts are presented to the grand jury, the two men may well be indicted, Earl.

They would then be arrested, prosecuted and tried. Their guilt or innocence would be established in a court of law, not by emotional; liberals on a website who seem to assume that white men are automatically murderers if they kill a man with Black skin.
Indeed

White man/men, black man, Ga., the white man is automatically guilty...per the morons.
 
Killing an unarmed man is a crime. Was it really necessary to explain that to you? They should be in jail, and now that the cat is out of the bag, they will be.

Firstly, you do not know whether the running guy was armed or not before the fact. Please stop making this up like it had validity.
Second, excop takes three shots to put him down ?
Is there no firearms training in GA ?
Lastly, did anyone bother asking the county why they took no direct action at the time (before the outside prosecuter hot tagged by the state)?
 
Indeed

White man/men, black man, Ga., the white man is automatically guilty...per the morons.

They should be arrested and charged. The system will determine their guilt. Zero reason this sh*t had to happen.
 
Firstly, you do not know whether the running guy was armed or not before the fact. Please stop making this up like it had validity.
Second, excop takes three shots to put him down ?
Is there no firearms training in GA ?
Lastly, did anyone bother asking the county why they took no direct action at the time (before the outside prosecuter hot tagged by the state)?

Yes I do. He was unarmed. Maybe try reading?
 
Ho...ho...ho. The moron was eviserated by Legion and caught in a lie.

No, in this instance I asked if he could cite the statute and he complied.

I'm still waiting for an unspecified number of like citations.

In some states it is a felony.

Perhaps he will learn not to make generalized claims without researching matters first and will eschew presenting assumptions as fact.
 
I think the Father of the duo is an ex-police officer. That may have a lot to do with it.
(They know the exact 'Law' that let's them legally kill people)

He was a former investigator for the court. Since he’s not a law enforcement officer at the time he has no legal right whatsoever to assault a civilian with a deadly weapon. Not to mention his son, who did the shooting, has not worked for law enforcement.

Also since they were the aggressors a self defense or stand your ground defense doesn’t hold water.
 
Back
Top