Serious question here: If Floyd died from neck compression as claimed.....

Now you are using the equivocation fallacy. Evidence is used to prove something but it doesn't make the evidence a proof and I never said it was a proof.
You are simply taking the word "prove" which was used as an verb and now trying to use the word "proof" as a noun to argue I am wrong.
Evidence is used to prove something but it doesn't make the evidence a proof and I never said it was a proof.

For someone that claimed to not often use ad hominem arguments, you seem to attack me personally a lot. :)

Calling me a liar doesn't show how my statements are wrong. They only show you resorting to fallacious arguments rather than arguing the substance and providing support for your position.

Lies. Word salad. Denial of logic. No argument presented.
 
I'm afraid you have lost context completely. You are no longer making any sense. You have taken my statements out of context so far you have lost context yourself.

Done here. Nothing left but a dead parrot.

Sure.. You really didn't say this...

Insufficient evidence from some possibly fictional transcript is no valid evidence.

Perhaps when you talked about insufficient evidence you were talking about insufficient evidence of you having a brain or some other such nonsense and you hadn't lost track of what you claimed there was no evidence for and now was trying to argue that it was in the transcript instead of the autopsy.
 
Back
Top