See things like that are why we don't take you guys seriously.
Bullshit fallacy. You dont take righties seriously because you are partisan, subjective creature. A commie.
See things like that are why we don't take you guys seriously.
Uh. What were the demonstrations for?
When you are confronted with an angry baying mob who broke down your gate, what the fuck are you supposed to do? How were they to know that they weren't go to kill them?
Bullshit fallacy. You dont take righties seriously because you are partisan, subjective creature. A commie.
Yes I see it. "If" she is not authorized, that means it's illegal and should be arrested.
And "if" she is authorized, that means she knows how to assemble it and use it properly, which is the point.
What? I've had great discussion with "righties". Some even got me to see their point of view and sometimes convinced me.
Rinos are your comrades
No. She can still legally own the gun and not know shit about it. If she is authorized to carry it though, she will know lots of stuff about it.
Too late.
Not too late, it's clear that the DA officials wanted to cover up the fact that the gun was rendered inoperable. That surely has to be a crime, don'tcha think?

If they tried to cover it up, then how come we know about it?![]()
If they tried to cover it up, then how come we know about it?![]()
That's a seriously stupid question!!
LOL do you read you posts?
They didn't break the gate down. Videos prove that. Neighbors weren't feeling threatened. They were on the way to mayor's house.
They came into their property by opening the gate, the gate was damaged later on. The irony is they are both civil rights lawyers and liberals to boot.
Yes. If they tried to cover it up, they failed miserably.
Still a crime regardless, it's called tampering with evidence.
And you actually think the DA and judge don't know that?