McCloskey’s Gun Didn’t Work So A Prosecutor Ordered It Reassembled And Then Declared

Into the Night said:
They lose that right when assaulting another or invading their property. It IS the point of the charges. This couple have the right to defend themselves and their property.
Click to expand...

They do not have the right to brandish their weapons against people who were not threatening them.

Let me ask you this, dumbass... why were the demonstrators there? And why weren't the neighbors concerned?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
That's what the defense will have to prove
Click to expand...
Nope. The governor is going to pardon them anyway. There is also a federal investigation into the attorney general of Missouri.
Dutch Uncle said:
but the video only shows Patty going psycho. Is she a relative?
Click to expand...
Psychoquackery.
Dutch Uncle said:
Is this where you demand that Trump send in his Praetorian Guard to quell the blacks and free the old white heros from Socialists?
Click to expand...
TDS.
 
volsrock said:
McCloskey’s Gun Didn’t Work So A Prosecutor Ordered It Reassembled And Then Declared It Lethal

The gun Patricia McCloskey waved at protesters was inoperable when it arrived at the St. Louis police crime lab, but a member of Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner’s staff ordered crime lab experts to disassemble and reassemble it and wrote that it was “readily capable of lethal use” in charging documents filed Monday, 5 On Your Side has learned.

In Missouri, police and prosecutors must prove that a weapon is “readily” capable of lethal use when it is used in the type of crime with which the McCloskeys have been charged.

Assistant Circuit Attorney Chris Hinckley ordered crime lab staff members to field strip the handgun and found it had been assembled incorrectly. Specifically, the firing pin spring was put in front of the firing pin, which was backward, and made the gun incapable of firing, according to documents obtained by 5 On Your Side.

https://hotair.com/archives/john-s-...secutors-ordered-reassembled-declared-lethal/


It should be grounds for dismissing the charges BEFORE it ever gets to trial! And bring the DA, assistant Circuit Atty, and the head of the lab up on tampering with evidence charges NOW.
Click to expand...

Irregardless this man/women should have never been charged. They never left their property, and they have the right to defend it.

This is a clear violation of their constitutional rights.
 
AProudLefty said:
Then maybe they shouldn't go to a parade.

Proof.
Click to expand...
It will all be settled in court. IMO, Patricia is going to plead to brandishing with a minimum sentence (fine?) and nothing to Mark.

...and you're arguing with someone who is intelligent but whose elevators stop short of top.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top