National Guard commander says police used ‘excessive force’ to clear Lafayette Square

J

jacksonsprat22

Verified User
An Army National Guard commander who witnessed protesters forcibly removed from Lafayette Square last month is contradicting claims by the attorney general and the Trump administration that they did not speed up the clearing to make way for the president’s photo opportunity minutes later.

A new statement by Adam DeMarco, an Iraq veteran who now serves as a major in the D.C. National Guard, also casts doubt on the claims by acting Park Police Chief Gregory Monahan that violence by protesters spurred Park Police to clear the area at that time with unusually aggressive tactics.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...me-time/promo#link-FELSPSR6PFB75MMSPP2KX7KUZY


Trump is a liar.
 
jacksonsprat22 said:
An Army National Guard commander who witnessed protesters forcibly removed from Lafayette Square last month is contradicting claims by the attorney general and the Trump administration that they did not speed up the clearing to make way for the president’s photo opportunity minutes later.

A new statement by Adam DeMarco, an Iraq veteran who now serves as a major in the D.C. National Guard, also casts doubt on the claims by acting Park Police Chief Gregory Monahan that violence by protesters spurred Park Police to clear the area at that time with unusually aggressive tactics.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...me-time/promo#link-FELSPSR6PFB75MMSPP2KX7KUZY


Trump is a liar.
Click to expand...

What makes his opinion valid? I suspect that you agree with it is all that matters.
 
DeMarco is scheduled to testify Tuesday before the House Natural Resources Committee, which is investigating the government’s actions in clearing protesters away from Lafayette Square with projectiles, gas, smoke and mounted police, including an apparent assault on Australian journalists by two Park Police officers. His statement was posted Monday on the committee’s website. Monahan also is scheduled to testify.
 
jacksonsprat22 said:
Fact that you have nothing to say. Got it.
Click to expand...

The fact is I have you pegged, boy.

You heard something you liked and automatically believed it to be true based on agreeing with it.

I have yet to determine whether or not it was excessive. Unlike you, I'll look at both sides. You automatically puckered up because you liked what you heard.
 
CFM said:
The fact is I have you pegged, boy.

You heard something you liked and automatically believed it to be true based on agreeing with it.

I have yet to determine whether or not it was excessive. Unlike you, I'll look at both sides. You automatically puckered up because you liked what you heard.
Click to expand...


What evalutation are you making, Trump supporter? Well?
 
jacksonsprat22 said:
What evalutation are you making, Trump supporter? Well?
Click to expand...

A quick look at your post shows you determine whether something is fact or not based on agreement with it not on what actually happened.

Also, it's evaluation, not evalutation. You're just a stupid piece of shit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top