'Fact-checkers' dishonestly downplay Harris family owning slaves

[Cypress]

Facebook's lying partisan "fact-checkers" have rushed in with more "make up whatever we feel like" opinions to insist there is nothing to see here...in response to the 5-alarm hypocrisy fire that the lawless police state tyrant, slutty opportunistic adulterer, and lunatic fringe extremist who wants white people to forever live in the distant past and endlessly grovel, apologize, and be punished for slavery that they never took part in...actually came from a family that owned slaves.

So which is it? Live in the distant past or don't live in the distant past? You can't have it both ways, dishonest demagogues.



Fact Check: Kamala Harris Descended From A Slave Owner, But It's Not 'An Inconvenient Part Of Her History' Or A 'Deep, Dark Secret' That 'Could Come Back To Haunt Her'

White plantation owners in Jamaica and the southern United States raped a lot of black female slaves, resulting in many black mulatto children.

Is this news to you?

 

[artichoke]

Stupid? I'd say violent...

...with little concern what it costs innocent business owners.

The two aren't mutually exclusive. They ARE violent, and they ARE stupid, as evidenced by them trying to punish all white people for things they had nothing to do with...while actually BEING the ones who descended from the ACTUAL slave holders. Can't have it both ways. Either live in the past and blame the wrong people or don't.

 

[artichoke]

You need to seek help for your mental issues.

You need to be smarter. Yawn.

 

[artichoke]

In your case it's no brains, no pain.

Says the guy who NEVER contributes ANYTHING but inept, mindless nonsense like this.

 

[Jarod]

Facebook's lying partisan "fact-checkers" have rushed in with more "make up whatever we feel like" opinions to insist there is nothing to see here...in response to the 5-alarm hypocrisy fire that the lawless police state tyrant, slutty opportunistic adulterer, and lunatic fringe extremist who wants white people to forever live in the distant past and endlessly grovel, apologize, and be punished for slavery that they never took part in...actually came from a family that owned slaves.

So which is it? Live in the distant past or don't live in the distant past? You can't have it both ways, dishonest demagogues.



Fact Check: Kamala Harris Descended From A Slave Owner, But It's Not 'An Inconvenient Part Of Her History' Or A 'Deep, Dark Secret' That 'Could Come Back To Haunt Her'

Why is what her ancestors owned or did not own relevant?

I dont get it, on one side of my family three generations ago, they owned slaves also. So fucking what?

 

[artichoke]

#deflection

The Stonebystone Playbook

1) Jew-hating bigotry.

2) Deflect with bullshit irrelevancies

3) Ignorantly butchering fallacies.

4) Stake out some ridiculously false talking point and act baffled when people laugh at your dishonest stupidity.

I see we're going with number 3 this time. No, adding additional points to your overall point is not deflection, dumb-ass.

 

[artichoke]

Using the term “fact checking” and Tucker Carlson in the same post is a contradiction in realities

Translation: I don't like Tucker Carlson.

 

[RB 60]

#deflection

 

[Yakuda]

Why does this matter?

Why the fuck then are all these assholess kneeling down you stupid shit?

 

[artichoke]

#whataboutism

The Stonebystone Playbook

1) Jew-hating bigotry.

2) Deflect with bullshit irrelevancies

3) Ignorantly butchering fallacies.

4) Stake out some ridiculously false talking point and act baffled when people laugh at your dishonest stupidity.

Again with more #3. No, pointing out the invalid logic of trying to discriminate against white people at every turn for things from the distant past that they didn't do...while also demanding that people not hold you accountable for BEING a slave-owner family...is NOTHING LIKE whataboutism, dumb-ass.



Idiotic as always.

 

[BattleofHodow]

The Stonebystone Playbook

1) Jew-hating bigotry.

2) Deflect with bullshit irrelevancies

3) Ignorantly butchering fallacies.

4) Stake out some ridiculously false talking point and act baffled when people laugh at your dishonest stupidity.

I see we're going with number 3 this time. No, adding additional points to your overall point is not deflection, dumb-ass.

Why do you love Jews so much?

 

[artichoke]

Why is what her ancestors owned or did not own relevant?

Say the people pushing slavery reparations.

Comprehend it yet?

 

[artichoke]

Why the fuck then are all these assholess kneeling down you stupid shit?

 

[artichoke]

Why do you love Jews so much?

Being non-racist isn't loving ANYONE. It's just not hating people for bigoted reasons like Democrats do.

 

[Yakuda]

Being non-racist isn't loving ANYONE. It's just not hating people for bigoted reasons like Democrats do.

These dumbasses don't even know racist means.

 

[RB 60]

Why is what her ancestors owned or did not own relevant?

I dont get it, on one side of my family three generations ago, they owned slaves also. So fucking what?

Tell BLM that.

 

[artichoke]

These dumbasses don't even know racist means.

Apparently. Not even when the definition is staring right at them in the mirror.

 

[Yakuda]

Say the people pushing slavery reparations.

Comprehend it yet?

Isn't it it amazing how blind they are to their own hypocrisy?

 

[artichoke]

Tell BLM that.

DING DING DING!!! And thus, the point of the thread.

 

[artichoke]

Isn't it it amazing how blind they are to their own hypocrisy?

I mean it's easy when you stand for nothing but Democrat power. Who cares how many times or ways you contradict yourself when that's who you are?