So is Trump going full dictator?

"Trump doesn't commit to peaceful transfer of power if he loses"

"President Donald Trump again declined to commit to a peaceful transfer of power if he loses the Nov. 3 presidential election."

“We’re going to have to see what happens,” Trump said Wednesday at a news conference, responding to a question about whether he’d commit to a peaceful transfer of power. “You know that I’ve been complaining very strongly about the ballots, and the ballots are a disaster."

"It is highly unusual that a sitting president would express less than complete confidence in the American democracy’s electoral process"

https://www.wnep.com/article/news/n...ower/507-01ca1e6a-0762-46b3-8d2e-d658d1f1f1c8



"The Trump campaign is reportedly planning a way to bypass the 2020 election results in key swing states"

"The Trump campaign is weighing a postelection strategy that would bypass the results in key swing states by installing electors who would vote for the president in the Electoral College even if he loses"

"Using a rationale of baseless claims about widespread voter fraud and other irregularities with mail ballots, President Donald Trump would ask state legislators to set aside the popular vote and exercise their power to choose a slate of electors directly"

"With the key swing states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin unable to legally process or count absentee ballots until Election Day, and with ongoing legal disputes over ballots received after Election Day, the Trump campaign is reportedly looking to cast doubt on the results"

https://www.businessinsider.com/tru...e-electors-plan-loyalists-swing-states-2020-9

Didn't think I would witness in my lifetime the mere mention that the United States could descend into a third world dictatorship. Has any of this type thought or even the consideration ever surfaced in this country prior to the rise of Trump? Do you think that maybe, just maybe, a correlation might exist?

Kayleigh Mecenany addressed this:


Trump will accept the results of a free and fair election. The only reason why anybody would be in conflict with having Trump exclude circumstances other than a free and fair election is if they were interested in something besides a free and fair election.
 
Well, let's see. Trump eats fast food every day and he never exercises. He's morbidly obese and he hardly sleeps. He drools in public. He struggles to sip water and needs both hands. He goes off on unfocused tangents and tweets really random, bizarre stuff. (I still don't know what "covfefe" is supposed to mean.) His vocabulary is increasingly shrinking. Etc., etc.

Fake news.
 
Trump needs to get checked for dementia, which his father and grandfather suffered. Maybe Trump needs to drool a bit more in public and rant about imaginary threats some more before he's declared mentally incompetent.

Biden is the candidate who is alleged to have the dementia. Biden's alleged dementia is probably the hottest political topic in regard to Biden. When you invert this and present a notion that the dementia topic is connected to Trump instead of Biden, it is a fallacy. You hijacked the dementia thing that is the dark cloud over Biden's campaign and inverted it. Inversion fallacy. You also know good and well that Biden is the one that the dementia topic is about, so you are also dishonest and a liar.
 
Back
Top