Trump doesn’t plan to concede if Biden is declared president-elect ...

Jerome said:
Is this your very first election you've ever witnessed?
Click to expand...

not me......I campaigned for McGovern when he ran against Nixon......it is, however, only the second election I have seen the demmycrats try to blatantly steal.......the first being the Bush/Gore election of 2000......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
not me......I campaigned for McGovern when he ran against Nixon......it is, however, only the second election I have seen the demmycrats try to blatantly steal.......the first being the Bush/Gore election of 2000......
Click to expand...

Oh I see, you're absorbed into the cult as well.

How did the democrats manage to steal the presidential election yet lose so many congressional and senate seats, you fucking genius?
 
AssHatZombie said:
court cases are proceeding.
Click to expand...

Lol, no, cases are getting kicked out of court like a streaker holding a flask, dumbshit.

https://www.npr.org/2020/11/10/9331...o-legal-success-this-month-heres-what-they-ve

Thus far, the campaign has scored a few wins in court but none that will have an effect on the result of the state. A state court, and separately the U.S. Supreme Court, ruled that local officials must segregate some ballots in case deadlines that were extended by the secretary of state are found to be unconstitutional.It's unclear how many ballots that will be at this point, but experts are extremely skeptical it will be anywhere close to enough to overturn Biden's current 45,000-vote lead in the state
 
Jerome said:
PA counts votes that arrive by mail up to 3 days after the election. Even if they only counted the votes arriving on election day, however, trump loses by 10s of thousands, and it's not close.
Click to expand...

for those less aware of what is going on, the SC has not said that the votes will be allowed to be used to determine the election......only that there was not sufficient time to hear the issue before the election......they ordered that they be counted and sequestered and that in the event it became necessary they would address the issue of whether they would be allowed to stand at a later time......the underlying legal issue is whether the PA courts could alter what the PA legislature set down.......the case of Bush v Gore set the precedent that it could not......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
for those less aware of what is going on, the SC has not said that the votes will be allowed to be used to determine the election......only that there was not sufficient time to hear the issue before the election......they ordered that they be counted and sequestered and that in the event it became necessary they would address the issue of whether they would be allowed to stand at a later time......the underlying legal issue is whether the PA courts could alter what the PA legislature set down.......the case of Bush v Gore set the precedent that it could not......
Click to expand...


Jesus Christ, how do you get this stupid?

Bush V. Gore is EXPRESSLY not a precedent.

‘consideration is limited to the presentcircumstances,’ - Bush v. Gore.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
not me......I campaigned for McGovern when he ran against Nixon......it is, however, only the second election I have seen the demmycrats try to blatantly steal.......the first being the Bush/Gore election of 2000......
Click to expand...

So you've never seen Democrats try and steal an election.

Thanks for admitting that, whore.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
for those less aware of what is going on, the SC has not said that the votes will be allowed to be used to determine the election......only that there was not sufficient time to hear the issue before the election......they ordered that they be counted and sequestered and that in the event it became necessary they would address the issue of whether they would be allowed to stand at a later time......the underlying legal issue is whether the PA courts could alter what the PA legislature set down.......the case of Bush v Gore set the precedent that it could not......
Click to expand...

Bush v Gore set exact zero precedent, and explicitly stated so, whore.
 
Jerome said:
Lol, no, cases are getting kicked out of court like a streaker holding a flask, dumbshit.

https://www.npr.org/2020/11/10/9331...o-legal-success-this-month-heres-what-they-ve

Thus far, the campaign has scored a few wins in court but none that will have an effect on the result of the state. A state court, and separately the U.S. Supreme Court, ruled that local officials must segregate some ballots in case deadlines that were extended by the secretary of state are found to be unconstitutional.It's unclear how many ballots that will be at this point, but experts are extremely skeptical it will be anywhere close to enough to overturn Biden's current 45,000-vote lead in the state
Click to expand...

no case has completed the appeals process yet and no one expected it wouldn't have to........obviously what "experts" expect might happen in a recount is meaningless if there are 50,000 sequestered votes that get thrown out.....guess what happens to Biden's 45,500 lead in that event......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
for those less aware of what is going on, the SC has not said that the votes will be allowed to be used to determine the election......only that there was not sufficient time to hear the issue before the election......they ordered that they be counted and sequestered and that in the event it became necessary they would address the issue of whether they would be allowed to stand at a later time......the underlying legal issue is whether the PA courts could alter what the PA legislature set down.......the case of Bush v Gore set the precedent that it could not......
Click to expand...

They were already separated, dimwit.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
no case has completed the appeals process yet and no one expected it wouldn't have to........obviously what "experts" expect might happen in a recount is meaningless if there are 50,000 sequestered votes that get thrown out.....guess what happens to Biden's 45,500 lead in that event......
Click to expand...

Nothing changes, idiot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top