cancel2 2022
Canceled
I'd love to see her squirming and not because she's sitting on a Sybian.
"Barr taps Durham as special counsel, pushing probe into Biden era"
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
I'd love to see her squirming and not because she's sitting on a Sybian.
no Durham is re-examining the predicate -but that was for the original counterintel early 2016
It's a low bar according to the IG -including bar talk.
by the time of the May SC appointment, they still had zero evidence of collusion ( per Lisa Page)
lol. did you even bother to clik the link I gave with the massive targeted leaks to the media?
Why would Comey confirm an investigation,when the media leaks did the political damage to Trump *da Russian*
for him instead?
it had to come from those in the know (players) -this was enough to keep the story on the front page for months
Tranquillus in Exile
New member
Just thought I’d add this to the discussion …
That was April 24, 2019, just one day after it was announced that the Queen would host the President on a state visit to Britain. British politicians from across the political spectrum called for the visit to be cancelled.
Now America has lost this master of diplomacy, greater than Talleyrand and Bismarck put together (if he ever heard of either of them).
Trumpies are nuts. They jump recklessly onto whatever crazy idea the Trump cabal dreams up and what will salvage their dangerous and not too bright candidate. Can they ever stop and analyze? The door to the presidency is shut. Trump lost, beaten like a rented mule. He is just trying to stay out of court and to amass as much money going out the door as he can. He is a despicable person but an excellent conman. To think he has millions of people wagging their tails and licking his lifted shoes. He can do no wrong.
Nope. Hes independant now.
what is lost? what's different?
nothing I see
same old fucked up intelligence agencies screaming about da Russians and the US cant leave Syria and all that junk noise
how have our diplomatic relations been damaged?
If anything NATO is now paying in more and China negotiated a phase 1 that will be abandoned by Biden -
back to the same feckless WTO
Losing Trump means losing American First, and diplomatic and trade gains
"self delusional Russiaphobia," and why would they have to tell the candidate when it is the candidate's own staff who is meeting with Russians?
"links during this period: outreach to two of Trump’s then-recently named foreign policy advisors, including a
representation that Russia had “dirt” on Clinton in the form of thousands of emails; dealings with a D.C.-based think tank that specializes in Russia and has connections with its government; a meeting at Trump Tower between the Campaign and a Russian lawyer promising dirt on candidate Clinton that was part of Russia and its government’s support for [Trump]; events at the
Republican National Convention; post-Convention contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia’s ambassador to the United States; and contacts through campaign chairman Paul Manafort, who had previously worked for a Russian oligarch and a pro-Russian political party in Ukraine" - Mueller Report (https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf)
And if you actually read primary sources rather than relying on such as Hannity to tell you what occurred you'd see that Mueller in the following pages 66-128 documented over a hundred contacts between Russians and Trump campaign officials, as I've said, Russians were all over the Trump campaign, which by the way, was confirmed in the recent GOP Senate report on the election
Tranquillus in Exile
New member
But will special counsel Durham be investigating the British connection? There must be one - Trump said so!
Tranquillus in Exile
New member
anatta, please try to face facts. A far-right conspiracy nut spouts something on OAN and Trump swallows it whole. It's not the beliefs that bother me so much, it's the mindset that accepts them without question.
Do you really want a President of the United States who is so FREAKING DUMB, yet thinks he knows it all?
Last edited:
you cant stay on topic. dont tell me to face facts when you are unable to debate such
You make these claims Trump damaged diplomacy, i ask you "what's changed" and you post spurious spam
what "conspiracy" why is it relevant to Durham..
Durham has interviewed all over the worldBut will special counsel Durham be investigating the British connection? There must be one - Trump said so!
https://www.justsecurity.org/71647/...t-poses-a-danger-to-us-intelligence-analysis/
Tranquillus in Exile
New member
Take a look at Trump’s tweet which I quoted in post #83. Trump almost succeeded in rupturing relations with America’s closest ally. It didn’t come to that because, like everyone except his cultists, they are well aware of the president’s crass stupidity and ignorance. That’s the President of the United States, the most powerful man in the world.
In another four years, from which the world has thankfully been spared, there would be more like that and maybe worse. But what do you or he care? It’s AMERICA FIRST like those Nazi sympathizers in the thirties; and TRUMP by a long way FIRSTEST.
That is all I have to say, relevant or not.
In another four years, from which the world has thankfully been spared, there would be more like that and maybe worse. But what do you or he care? It’s AMERICA FIRST like those Nazi sympathizers in the thirties; and TRUMP by a long way FIRSTEST.
That is all I have to say, relevant or not.
Last edited:
lol..rant out on Godwin's law
But will special counsel Durham be investigating the British connection? There must be one - Trump said so!
Hes investigating all of it.
Tranquillus in Exile
New member
I remain unconvinced that British intel spied on Trump’s 2016 campaign, despite the president’s tweet (post #83). His source, a conspiracy theorist called Larry Johnson, said he knows British intel did it because “some friends told me”. The president seems to have taken that as conclusive. Call me a skeptic, but I would like to see a little more evidence.
Maybe Durham could go to GCHQ and ask them: “Say, did you guys wiretap Trump Tower?” If they say “Yes, it’s a fair cop, guv” that would clear the FBI. No point putting all that effort into FISA warrants to spy on Trump if GCHQ was already doing it.
I remain unconvinced that British intel spied on Trump’s 2016 campaign, despite the president’s tweet (post #83). His source, a conspiracy theorist called Larry Johnson, said he knows British intel did it because “some friends told me”. The president seems to have taken that as conclusive. Call me a skeptic, but I would like to see a little more evidence.
Maybe Durham could go to GCHQ and ask them: “Say, did you guys wiretap Trump Tower?” If they say “Yes, it’s a fair cop, guv” that would clear the FBI. No point putting all that effort into FISA warrants to spy on Trump if GCHQ was already doing it.
Durham is investigating mayters pertaining to the illegal use of government intellegence agsinst a political foe. It goes wherever it goes.
Tranquillus in Exile
New member
Roger Stone has unmasked Barr and Durham as working for the Deep State:
"Mr. Durham has taken three years to produce nothing whatsoever. We have overwhelming evidence of both treason and crime. And now Mr. Durham's job is to bury all of it after the election. Bill Barr, you get what you expected."
https://www.newsweek.com/roger-stone-bill-barr-deep-state-trump-1551733
Btw, in US law ‘treason’ is defined as giving aid to an enemy state. Stone has overwhelming evidence of it, he says.
"Mr. Durham has taken three years to produce nothing whatsoever. We have overwhelming evidence of both treason and crime. And now Mr. Durham's job is to bury all of it after the election. Bill Barr, you get what you expected."
https://www.newsweek.com/roger-stone-bill-barr-deep-state-trump-1551733
Btw, in US law ‘treason’ is defined as giving aid to an enemy state. Stone has overwhelming evidence of it, he says.