Williams College mathematician IDs 90k-100k fraudulent ballots in Pennsylvania

[artichoke]

The FACT is that you have lost every single attempt in court.

In Democrat-run states notorious for voter fraud and allowing Democrats to get away with absolute murder, sure.

And who cares if EVERY court on the entire planet disagrees? Mathematically impossible is still mathematically impossible, no matter how many ways you try to spin it.

Its one scam after another

Say the pathological liars and scam-artist demagogues who pushed:

-the "Trump called soldiers losers" hoax
-the "peaceful protesters" hoax
-the Hydroxchloroquine hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi eagle" hoax
-the "Trump ignored Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers" hoax
-the coronavirus hoax
-the "Trump told people to drink Lysol" hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi red triangle" hoax
-the Russia collusion hoax
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax
-the Covington Catholic hoax
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax
-the Jussie Smollett hoax
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax
-the fake Ukraine transcript hoax
-the Trayvon Martin hoax
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax
-the "children in cages" hoax
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax
-the "Muslim ban" hoax
-the global warming "consensus" hoax
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax
-the "white privilege" hoax
-the voter suppression hoax
-and the "hands up don't shoot" hoax

which will go on for years to prove to your kind that Trump actually won the election.

He did. That much is beyond dispute at this point.

You will never admit that he lost by 6 million honest votes.

Well yeah. Admitting to defeat in the wake of a landslide victory makes no sense.

 

[artichoke]

You are babbling.

Yes, listing off the proof is "babbling."

Devastating counterpoint there, Socrates.

 

[artichoke]

He didn't identify anything. He offered an unexplained estimate. I can do that too if you'd like.

Guess you missed the "detailed analysis" section.

Again, your literacy issues are no one's problem but your own.

 

[artichoke]

That is coming from John Solomon, who isn’t exactly famous for his honesty

According to those who constantly lie to smear evidence they can't refute (just like you're doing), yes. Which means nothing.



Next diversionary fallacy, please.

show us another source that has the same story

This is code for "I can't do math or serious analysis, so I want an article to spoon-feed me my thoughts about it."

You don't get to smear the source (which you do with literally anything anyone posts, which isn't debating, it's a cheap attempt at a subject change) and demand another.

Detailed evidence has been presented. The math has been shown. Refute it or don't, low-IQ crybaby.

 

[no worries]

I mean, don't cheat and people won't have to "dream" by posting evidence of it at every turn.

Why is it these people aren't testifying in court?
Crazy eyes and the loony woman have hundreds of affidavits, very little witnesses.
That should tell you something, they're lying.

 

[artichoke]

Why is it these people aren't testifying in court?

Um, they are. They are signing statements that get them sent to prison if they're wrong. Guess CNN isn't bothering to include that part of the story? What a shock.

But nice attempt at an ad hominem fallacy.

There are USPS drivers admitting that they were instructed to backdate and deliver fake ballots. There is literally video evidence of Democrats wheeling suitcases of ballots into and out of controlled vote-counting areas after excluding GOP observers. There are IT people who have testified that they witnessed the same ballots being fed into the tabulating machines 80-100 times each.

You being kept clueless by your Soviet-style propaganda mills is not an absence of court witnesses testifying, as if that would prove anything anyway.

crazy eyes and the loony woman have hundreds of affidavits, very little witnesses. That should tell you something, they're lying.

And Democrats have a literally mathematically impossible explanation for the outcome and an epic shit ton of provably fake votes, but no actual Biden supporters.



And as the witnesses you're trying to pretend away all say, their lives are being destroyed by the same Democrat lynch mob terrorists who've spent four years straight using arson, assault, riots, looting, doxing, intimidation, and murder to bully and terrorize everyone out of their rights. So no, Democrats don't get to lie about the existence of the witnesses and demand more of them while simultaneously using mafia tactics to make sure anyone who does loses everything.

Total bullshit.

 

[no worries]

Um, they are. They are signing statements that get them sent to prison if they're wrong. Guess CNN isn't bothering to include that part of the story? What a shock.

But nice attempt at an ad hominem fallacy.

There are USPS drivers admitting that they were instructed to backdate and deliver fake ballots. There is literally video evidence of Democrats wheeling suitcases of ballots into and out of controlled vote-counting areas after excluding GOP observers. There are IT people who have testified that they witnessed the same ballots being fed into the tabulating machines 80-100 times each.

You being kept clueless by your Soviet-style propaganda mills is not an absence of court witnesses testifying, as if that would prove anything anyway.





And Democrats have a literally mathematically impossible explanation for the outcome and an epic shit ton of provably fake votes, but no actual Biden supporters.



And as the witnesses you're trying to pretend away all say, their lives are being destroyed by the same Democrat lynch mob terrorists who've spent four years straight using arson, assault, riots, looting, doxing, intimidation, and murder to bully and terrorize everyone out of their rights. So no, Democrats don't get to lie about the existence of the witnesses and demand more of them while simultaneously using mafia tactics to make sure anyone who does loses everything.

Total bullshit.

"Um, they are. They are signing statements that get them sent to prison if they're wrong. Guess CNN isn't bothering to include that part of the story? What a shock".
No, it won't, the affidavit COULD get them sent to prison.
People could say they signed it under duress.
People could say they believed the affidavit was true, to the best of their knowledge.
Many could be hearsay.
Lying under oath WILL get them sent to prison.
"There are USPS drivers admitting that they were instructed to backdate and deliver fake ballots. There is literally video evidence of Democrats wheeling suitcases of ballots into and out of controlled vote-counting areas after excluding GOP observers. There are IT people who have testified that they witnessed the same ballots being fed into the tabulating machines 80-100 times each".
Really?
So why aren't these people testifying?

"And as the witnesses you're trying to pretend away all say, their lives are being destroyed by the same Democrat lynch mob terrorists who've spent four years straight using arson, assault, riots, looting, doxing, intimidation, and murder to bully and terrorize everyone out of their rights. So no, Democrats don't get to lie about the existence of the witnesses and demand more of them while simultaneously using mafia tactics to make sure anyone who does loses everything".

You're right, it's bullshit, like you're entire comment, then again, look who you support.

 

[Hoosier Daddy]

Mark the date. Democrats suddenly suddenly DON'T think data and sworn affidavits from experts count as evidence. Funny how you do constant 180s on that to suit your needs.





The person noticing the statistical impossibility of your argument is the one who's on drugs?

Yes, your argument being demonstrably impossible mathematically is EXACTLY the same thing as saying, "you cheated because I said so."

do you really believe all that goofy shit? hillary beat trump by 3 million votes and a lot of people did not know just how stupid and corrupt and dishonest trump was then, and comey had just announced hillary was under investigation 10 days before the election...plus the sanders supporters were such bad losers a lot of them did not vote or voted for dickhead. right wingers and morons that usually do not vote were motivated to vote against hillary, because she has been the target of right wing lies and investigations for 2 decades, and yet never even charged with a misdemeanor. trump's bribed Ukraine, colluded with the Russians, obstructed justice at least 5 times, was impeached, lied over 20,000 times and his godawful handling of covid led to 280,000 Americans dying and you stupidly wonder how he could have lost?

THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE OF VOTER FRAUD IN ANY WAY ENOUGH TO CHANGE THE ELECTION...EVEN TRUMP ASS-KISSER AG BARR SAYS SO..you are insane.

 

[domer76]

Williams College mathematics professor Steven Miller recently signed a sworn affidavit affirming that he has identified more fraudulent ballots in Pennsylvania than Biden's margin of theft, and showing how there is no way the results there can be valid. Miller is an expert in analytic number theory and sabermetrics.

From the statement: “I estimate that the number of ballots that were either requested by someone other than the registered Republican or requested and returned but not counted range from 89,397 to 98,801.”

The evidence continues to mount...

So much desperate stupidity, so little time.

 

[martin]

Guess you missed the "detailed analysis" section.

Again, your literacy issues are no one's problem but your own.

You're referring to a "detailed analysis" of anonymous phone calls reported by unnamed sources sworn to in a meaningless affidavit.

 

[Micawber]

Delusional- see you Jan 20 2021

What is Santa bringing you bad children for Xmas this year?

A fucking false narrative. Ha ha! Hope it keeps you warm for 4 years you fucking imbecile cult white trash.

 

[Earl]

Williams College mathematics professor Steven Miller recently signed a sworn affidavit affirming that he has identified more fraudulent ballots in Pennsylvania than Biden's margin of theft, and showing how there is no way the results there can be valid. Miller is an expert in analytic number theory and sabermetrics.

From the statement: “I estimate that the number of ballots that were either requested by someone other than the registered Republican or requested and returned but not counted range from 89,397 to 98,801.”

The evidence continues to mount...

Indeed.

Democrats cheat.

Democrats always cheat.

 

[Earl]

“We burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive ? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror … If…if…We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation….
”Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago

 

[domer76]

In Democrat-run states notorious for voter fraud and allowing Democrats to get away with absolute murder, sure.

And who cares if EVERY court on the entire planet disagrees? Mathematically impossible is still mathematically impossible, no matter how many ways you try to spin it.





Say the pathological liars and scam-artist demagogues who pushed:

-the "Trump called soldiers losers" hoax
-the "peaceful protesters" hoax
-the Hydroxchloroquine hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi eagle" hoax
-the "Trump ignored Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers" hoax
-the coronavirus hoax
-the "Trump told people to drink Lysol" hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi red triangle" hoax
-the Russia collusion hoax
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax
-the Covington Catholic hoax
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax
-the Jussie Smollett hoax
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax
-the fake Ukraine transcript hoax
-the Trayvon Martin hoax
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax
-the "children in cages" hoax
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax
-the "Muslim ban" hoax
-the global warming "consensus" hoax
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax
-the "white privilege" hoax
-the voter suppression hoax
-and the "hands up don't shoot" hoax





He did. That much is beyond dispute at this point.




Well yeah. Admitting to defeat in the wake of a landslide victory makes no sense.

Forum clown

 

[Stone]

Delusional- see you Jan 20 2021

What is Santa bringing you bad children for Xmas this year?

A fucking false narrative. Ha ha! Hope it keeps you warm for 4 years you fucking imbecile cult white trash.

You always seem like such a positive HAPPY person. A sure sign that someone has their life under control with the needle pointed up... UP... UP! Your contentment and general overall upbeat personality serve as a shining example of a quiet confidence that your political wish list along with your personal goals will surely be met. BRAVO my good man,....BRAVO! :rolleyes

 

[Stone]

Delusional- see you Jan 20 2021

What is Santa bringing you bad children for Xmas this year?

A fucking false narrative. Ha ha! Hope it keeps you warm for 4 years you fucking imbecile cult white trash.

+ 100! You even managed to slip a little racism in at the end too! Im tellin ya,....that positive attitude of yours is contagious! You literally just exude confidence!!! WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Cypress]

Williams College mathematics professor Steven Miller recently signed a sworn affidavit affirming that he has identified more fraudulent ballots in Pennsylvania than Biden's margin of theft, and showing how there is no way the results there can be valid. Miller is an expert in analytic number theory and sabermetrics.

From the statement: “I estimate that the number of ballots that were either requested by someone other than the registered Republican or requested and returned but not counted range from 89,397 to 98,801.”

The evidence continues to mount...

Professor Williams prof disavows own finding of mishandled GOP ballots

Steven Miller, a professor of mathematics at Williams College, issued a statement Monday in which he apologized for a “lack of clarity and due diligence” after his statistical analysis of Pennsylvania mail-in votes was used by conservative lawmakers to push unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud.

https://www.berkshireeagle.com/news...cle_9cfd4228-2e03-11eb-b2ac-bb9c8b2bfa7f.html

 

[Concart]

Yes, listing off the proof is "babbling."

Devastating counterpoint there, Socrates.

No, babbling is babbling. Which is what you're doing. There is no proof. No evidence. Nothing. There are no illegitimate ballots in Pennsylvania. Certified for Joseph R. Biden. You lose. Bye.

 

[Nordberg]

Rightys search for anyone who will say Trump won and the election is fixed. It does not matter that the elections were run,.mostly by Repubs, and were checked over and over and found to be factual. All you need is one outlier and you can start another damn thread about how Trump, the worst crook in political history, was cheated out of another well-deserved reign. This gets old.

 

[Concart]

Indeed.

Democrats cheat.

Democrats always cheat.

Lie. Show the evidence or STFU you hillbilly clown. What's that? You have no evidence? Option B it is. STFU.