Jill Biden has a PHD

Are you new to the English language? Jill Biden is a PhD in education. PhD's publish papers and books. That's part of being a PhD. I'd like to know what she's published and read some of it. The reason is, just because you have a PhD doesn't make you smart, a genius, nor particularly well educated outside a narrow field. I'd like to see where she's at knowledge-wise.

your law IQ and opioid addiction are making you delusional nobody said anything about genius you're making crap up
 
My conversation was with Jarod. I was speaking about his beliefs. This is obviously an open board and anyone can respond, as you did, but the conversation didn't involve you. So if you feel the need to defend Jarod's double standard position then have at it.

And don't call me dishonest when you (on multiple occasions) lie about what I believe and support.

Well I'm sorry, but you do a fair amount of tip toeing around revelation of what you believe and support, save the absolute fact
that you reserve all, every single ounce of 300,000 posts, for criticism for Dems.
 
PhD's publish papers and books. That's part of being a PhD.



Not true, they can roll it up, hang it on the wall or go surfing. You are ignorant. I can get a PhD in applied physics and apply physics, not write about it.
On the other hand you can go into academia and write a lot, or simply teach and not publish much. A PhD in education usually winds up
a high school principle. No bookwriting needed. No matter how you slice it it is far more respectable than being an overpaid raison eyed cheesecake model hasbeen.
 
Who the fuck said she's a "genius", and who the fuck cares?

We get it, you conservitards positively HATE education, advanced degrees, women, and learning. So, because this is a nexus of all three, it's CLEARLY challenging your ability to keep you from shitting your pants in rage.

My question is, why the FUCK should we care about your misogynistic insecurities?

I didn't say she was a genius. Your reading comprehension level is markedly low. I don't "HATE" any of those things you list. However, do explain this to me, you being Progressive and a supporter of the Democrat party. Why aren't you railing loud and long about the massive disparity in the teaching profession? After all, isn't it misandrogynous and racist that something close to 80% of all teachers are women and well more than 50% of those are White? Shouldn't you be demanding more men and minorities in the teaching profession? Shouldn't you be calling the teacher's unions racist and misandrogynous for not doing anything to promote more fairness and equity within the teaching profession?

I see it as a problem that there aren't many men or minorities in teaching. I think that's a huge disservice to our society.
 
Well I'm sorry, but you do a fair amount of tip toeing around revelation of what you believe and support, save the absolute fact
that you reserve all, every single ounce of 300,000 posts, for criticism for Dems.

Whether its lying or trolling that's clearly your M.O. so you do you dude. Feel free not to respond.
 
I didn't say she was a genius. Your reading comprehension level is markedly low. I don't "HATE" any of those things you list. However, do explain this to me, you being Progressive and a supporter of the Democrat party. Why aren't you railing loud and long about the massive disparity in the teaching profession? After all, isn't it misandrogynous and racist that something close to 80% of all teachers are women and well more than 50% of those are White? Shouldn't you be demanding more men and minorities in the teaching profession? Shouldn't you be calling the teacher's unions racist and misandrogynous for not doing anything to promote more fairness and equity within the teaching profession?

So now you're deflecting to something completely unrelated to the original thread (which was....I think....the problem with female teachers not understanding STEM?).

Are you okay?


I see it as a problem that there aren't many men or minorities in teaching. I think that's a huge disservice to our society.

Lol, you so don't. You don't give a single, solitary fuck, so stop pretending you do.
 
So now you're deflecting to something completely unrelated to the original thread (which was....I think....the problem with female teachers not understanding STEM?).
You moved it there. Threads often meander. Wouldn't you agree that if female teachers don't understand STEM well that's a serious problem for our society? Wouldn't a possible fix be to hire more male teachers, particularly so there is more fair and equal balance in gender in teaching to get good STEM teachers if that's what it took? The same goes for minority teachers. Hiring more, particularly in STEM might push more minorities to become interested in such careers. Wouldn't that be good for society?
What's so good about having a teaching system overwhelmingly dominated by White women? How would you feel about that if it were White men dominating the profession?

Lol, you so don't. You don't give a single, solitary fuck, so stop pretending you do.

Amazing! Another supposed mind-reader that got it wrong...
 
I look forward to see if she's going to be honest about her stepson/husband/famiy's "partnership".....


I'm really curious, in your own words, what is that "partnership"?


I've yet to see one of these retarded trump lackeys actually make a case for what fraud/malfeasance they're alleging, much less what's been proven.
 
"Holy shit, you mean they just PURELY care about passing along knowledge and helping others progress with their lives for the purposes of satisfaction and career fulfillment?

What good is that shit? How is THAT gonna help me scrooge-mcduck my way into a pile of money or skeet-skeet-skeet on hot women I see on the Internet?

Pppssshh!! Teaching! Helping people? psh!"

-TA GArdner
Teaching at community college was my favorite job ever -- the money was not great and I could have made more money doing something else, but I loved teaching and didn't care.

I also know PhDs who worked in the corporate world because their brains and analytical abilities had monetary value, but they were not actually any doing original research and publication.
 
Teaching at community college was my favorite job ever -- the money was not great and I could have made more money doing something else, but I loved teaching and didn't care.

I also know PhDs who worked in the corporate world because their brains and analytical abilities had monetary value, but they were not actually any doing original research and publication.


Yep. Unfettered capitalism has some FUCKED UP anti-humanitarian priorities.
 
You moved it there. Threads often meander.

No, I didn't. You did. Spontaneously and incoherently

Wouldn't you agree that if female teachers don't understand STEM well that's a serious problem for our society?

Only if they're teaching stuff that's STEM related, and only if I agree with your sweeping generalization that women don't understand STEM, in general.

So, no.
Wouldn't a possible fix be to hire more male teachers, particularly so there is more fair and equal balance in gender in teaching to get good STEM teachers if that's what it took?

Jesus christ, and you rightwingers claim us Lefties are all about "identity politics"?

The same goes for minority teachers. Hiring more, particularly in STEM might push more minorities to become interested in such careers. Wouldn't that be good for society?
What's so good about having a teaching system overwhelmingly dominated by White women? How would you feel about that if it were White men dominating the profession?

Would you like to talk about WHY women disproportionately dominate the teaching profession? This is a system set up for, and by, white men. Think "jews own all the banks" (they do so because it was the only profession they were allowed into).

So you're really not being as woke as you think....
 
I'm really curious, in your own words, what is that "partnership"?


I've yet to see one of these retarded trump lackeys actually make a case for what fraud/malfeasance they're alleging, much less what's been proven.
Their knowledge of what was taking place....
 
Yep. Unfettered capitalism has some FUCKED UP anti-humanitarian priorities.

I'll bite.

What does "fettered" vs. unfettered capitalism have to do with where someone with a PhD chooses to work?

In your world should those with PhD's only teach/do research in Universities and nothing else so as to not have anti-humanitarian priorities?
 
It's partisan politics, everything is deeply hypocritical. There are very few exceptions.

In this case I'm speaking directly to Jarod. If you're going to put yourself out as this so open-minded and progressive person it's not really consistent to be pushing this position.

What position is that? That two nude women in sexual poses in bed together is pornography? Why is that? It IS pornography, and so what? It seems that you want me to make a judgment calling pornography bad. Tough. It is not a crime -- unless it includes children or non-consenting adults. It is not a sin. It just is. The negative judgment is yours, not mine.

Come back when you all wipe the hypocritical sauce off your chins.
 
People whose careers involve original reasearch and policy analysis will publish in peer reviewed journals.

I have personally worked with about two dozen PhDs who do not publish anything, nada, zip, zilch because their jobs do not require original research.

I have no idea if Dr. Biden is published, but I have never met a community college teacher who was deeply involved in research and publication. People with PhDs who work at community colleges do so because they love teaching, not original research.

https://www.amazon.com/Jill-Biden/e/B007IC0530?ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_3&qid=1607981067&sr=1-3
 
What position is that? That two nude women in sexual poses in bed together is pornography? Why is that? It IS pornography, and so what? It seems that you want me to make a judgment calling pornography bad. Tough. It is not a crime -- unless it includes children or non-consenting adults. It is not a sin. It just is. The negative judgment is yours, not mine.

Come back when you all wipe the hypocritical sauce off your chins.

To be clear my response in the above was directed at Jarod.

I don't think two women naked in bed, even sexually suggestive, is pornography. Provocative surely. But not porn. And Jarod's not dumb, he's knows how he's framing it. I don't give two sh*ts about Melania Trump. I don't wish the woman ill in any way I just don't care about her one way or the other. I'm arguing the position and that's two women in bed isn't porn.

If that makes me a hypocrite then so be it.
 
I have to respect someone to be civil towards them.

Why?? Being civil has nothing to do with your personal feelings. Civility is a lubricant for human interaction. It's not a statement about your likes and dislikes.

Why do you expect people to be civil to you when you constantly insult them??
 
Back
Top