not good. we have no morals. politics is a literal blood sport. people have no idea of the common good -just me me me
Not that religion guarantees any of this is abated - but we have lost all sense of what the founders called Providence
not good. we have no morals. politics is a literal blood sport. people have no idea of the common good -just me me me
Not that religion guarantees any of this is abated - but we have lost all sense of what the founders called Providence
of course not.You need a God to tell you what's right and what's wrong?
"Biblical literalism is not a tenet of Roman Catholicism".![]()
Dukkie is a moron of the Trump variety. My friends who are atheists, agnostic and pagan are far more moral than many Christians.Perhaps so. I'll point out that the party and IMPOTUSx2 that shows the least amount of principle, honor, ethics, morality is the one that starts with (R). Ironically, they are the same ppl who claim to be ever-so-in-with-Jesus.
of course not.
Buddhism has no gods, and is greatly concerned wiht a just and moral life to aid "good karma"
of course not.
Buddhism has no gods, and is greatly concerned wiht a just and moral life to aid "good karma"
That’s my observation as well, all hat...So you just pay lip service to Buddhism, but don't actually practice it. Got it.
Origen of Alexandria, Saint Augustine, other apostolic church fathers wrote that the new and old testaments should be read and interpreted at an allegorical level.
Catholic doctrine, broadly speaking and with exceptions, is that interpretations of the bible are provisional and should be changed depending on the current state of human knowlege in natural philosophy and science -- aka, interpretations and understandings of the bible are not inerrant and ironclad.
not good. we have no morals. politics is a literal blood sport. people have no idea of the common good -just me me me
Not that religion guarantees any of this is abated - but we have lost all sense of what the founders called Providence
History goes through cycles. There will probably be more "great awakenings" in the future.
My two cents: the important thing is that people comport themselves consistent with the moral philosophies of Jesus, Siddhartha Gautama, Confucius, Zoroaster, Muhammad, et al.
Not that they go to church.
The non-canonical Gospel of Thomas may have the right approach: salvation comes through Jesus' teachings, not his resurrection.
So ... what was the beef with Copernicus and Galileo?
in theory you are correct, what i am NOT SEEING is any attempts at moral philosophiesHistory goes through cycles. There will probably be more "great awakenings" in the future.
My two cents: the important thing is that people comport themselves consistent with the moral philosophies of Jesus, Siddhartha Gautama, Confucius, Zoroaster, Muhammad, et al.
Not that they go to church.
The non-canonical Gospel of Thomas may have the right approach: salvation comes through Jesus' teachings, not his resurrection.