My Pillow CEO Mike Lindell PERMANENTLY BANNED by twitter for challenging election

anatta said:
so what?
I remember for year conspiracy guys were saying we never landed on the moon -it was all staged.

Even if its a conspiracy theory, we need to be able to speak,and if we cant use social media
we might as well be shouting down a well

why does fascist big tech get to rule on speech?
Click to expand...

Because they are an out of control oligarchy lol?

Big Tech operates as a kind of fascist information cartel. Consequently, they are able to function as gate keepers and truth arbiters. Yes, it is totally legal.

But I challenge anyone to argue that it’s healthy for a democracy for any entity to be able to arbitrarily shutdown one side of a debate.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
For 4 years hillary has claimed the 2016 election was stolen. Who censored her.?
Click to expand...

Did she really? I don't think so. Also, Trump wasn't banned from Twitter for claiming election lies; he'd been spouting them on Twitter for a couple months after the election. What earned him a ban was when he incited an insurrection. Twitter decided it didn't want him on their platform any longer, so they made a business decision to remove his fat ass from their servers.
 
Michael_Panetta said:
Did she really? I don't think so. Also, Trump wasn't banned from Twitter for claiming election lies; he'd been spouting them on Twitter for a couple months after the election. What earned him a ban was when he incited an insurrection. Twitter decided it didn't want him on their platform any longer, so they made a business decision to remove his fat ass from their servers.
Click to expand...

The information cartel banned the leader of the free world for questioning aspects of an election.

That drew criticism even from Germany’s Merkel. Germans can be a little sensitive about fascism.

What’s going on here is pretty transparent. The cartel has been looking for an excuse to ban Trump. They were already shadow banning conservatives; conservatives mysteriously ‘losing followers’ en mass and etc.

But Trump was a special case—he was a thorn in their side because he used Twitter to troll democrats and liberal talking heads; and, he used it to get his message to his followers without the establishment media being able to spin it. Particularly annoying, was Trump’s habit of walking all over the Daily Talking Points.

THAT is why he got a lifetime ban. The ‘insurrection’ was just a pretext.
 
Darth Omar said:
The information cartel banned the leader of the free world for questioning aspects of an election.

That drew criticism even from Germany’s Merkel. Germans can be a little sensitive about fascism.

What’s going on here is pretty transparent. The cartel has been looking for an excuse to ban Trump. They were already shadow banning conservatives; conservatives mysteriously ‘losing followers’ en mass and etc.

But Trump was a special case—he was a thorn in their side because he used Twitter to troll democrats and liberal talking heads; and, he used it to get his message to his followers without the establishment media being able to spin it. Particularly annoying, was Trump’s habit of walking all over the Daily Talking Points.

THAT is why he got a lifetime ban. The ‘insurrection’ was just a pretext.
Click to expand...

No. You're just a paranoid conspiracy theorist. After his failed insurrection, there were legitimate fears that he might call for more violence. Twitter has the right to ban anyone from their platform, and so they chose to ban Trump.

If Trump had legitimate questions about the election, then he should have gone through legitimate channels--you know, like what happened during Bush v. Gore. The Bush campaign went through legitimate channels.

Trump's problem is that he has no evidence for his claims. America's problem is that people like you are too eager to believe his every word.

The real question is at what point do you put country over Trump? At what point is too far for you to follow Trump's insanity?
 
Michael_Panetta said:
No. You're just a paranoid conspiracy theorist. After his failed insurrection, there were legitimate fears that he might call for more violence. Twitter has the right to ban anyone from their platform, and so they chose to ban Trump.

If Trump had legitimate questions about the election, then he should have gone through legitimate channels--you know, like what happened during Bush v. Gore. The Bush campaign went through legitimate channels.

Trump's problem is that he has no evidence for his claims. America's problem is that people like you are too eager to believe his every word.

The real question is at what point do you put country over Trump? At what point is too far for you to follow Trump's insanity?
Click to expand...

Going through the court system isn’t a legitimate process?

And Trump did not call for violence. I reject that idea. It’s utter speculation that the rioters were motivated by Trump. Maybe Trump isn’t a requirement to question the election results. It’s not for me and I’m certain I’m not alone in that.

‘Fight like hell’ is an obvious figure of speech. Democrats have ‘fought like hell’ to impeach Trump. Ball player’s ‘fight like hell’ to win games etc.

It’s nonsense.
 
Darth Omar said:
The information cartel banned the leader of the free world for questioning aspects of an election.

That drew criticism even from Germany’s Merkel. Germans can be a little sensitive about fascism.

What’s going on here is pretty transparent. The cartel has been looking for an excuse to ban Trump. They were already shadow banning conservatives; conservatives mysteriously ‘losing followers’ en mass and etc.

But Trump was a special case—he was a thorn in their side because he used Twitter to troll democrats and liberal talking heads; and, he used it to get his message to his followers without the establishment media being able to spin it. Particularly annoying, was Trump’s habit of walking all over the Daily Talking Points.

THAT is why he got a lifetime ban. The ‘insurrection’ was just a pretext.
Click to expand...
when Germany and France tell you to stop surpressing free speech.....
 
Darth Omar said:
Yup, they would certainly know it when they see it.

That’s exactly what it is. Whether it’s legal is a straw man
Click to expand...
Its legal because Congress is inept.
whether the legality or not -as Germany points out- suppression of political speech is fascist
 
AssHatZombie said:
it was totally stolen. stop lying.
Click to expand...

The election was NOT stolen. Trump lost big-time. On the popular vote...he lost by over 7,000,000 votes. In the Electoral College vote...he lost 306 to 232...the same vote the moron called a "landslide" when it was in his favor.

He is a traitor to this nation for continuing to claim the election was stolen...with not one piece of evidence that 90 courts have found persuasive.

YOU ARE A TRAITOR for continuing to support this pig.
 
anatta said:
Its legal because Congress is inept.
whether the legality or not -as Germany points out- suppression of political speech is fascist
Click to expand...

It’s one of the hallmarks of fascism.

I don’t think there’s a First Amendment argument but they are definitely colluding to suppress conservative voices and it’s gotten worse over night.
 
Darth Omar said:
It’s one of the hallmarks of fascism.

I don’t think there’s a First Amendment argument but they are definitely colluding to suppress conservative voices and it’s gotten worse over night.
Click to expand...
Congress should recognize social media for what it is -the new "public square"
I guess they are too busy doing Impeachment 2.0
 
Frank Apisa said:
The election was NOT stolen. Trump lost big-time. On the popular vote...he lost by over 7,000,000 votes. In the Electoral College vote...he lost 306 to 232...the same vote the moron called a "landslide" when it was in his favor.

He is a traitor to this nation for continuing to claim the election was stolen...with not one piece of evidence that 90 courts have found persuasive.

YOU ARE A TRAITOR for continuing to support this pig.
Click to expand...

nope. massive cheating. sorry charlie. you're gonna have to get over it. move on.
 
Darth Omar said:
It’s one of the hallmarks of fascism.

I don’t think there’s a First Amendment argument but they are definitely colluding to suppress conservative voices and it’s gotten worse over night.
Click to expand...

230 needs to be altered.

I had to get over the righty brainwash about the innate goodness of corpoations too.

we're deep into fascism now.

the privatization of the commons demands these reasonable safeguards.

and yes, the "supply side" movement is about the innate goodness of corporations. its fascism.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top