Dershowitz says likely Chauvin conviction will be reversed thanx to Maxiine

Poor Richard Saunders said:
One small problem with that claim. You have to provide evidence that at least one of the jurors heard Water's statements. Since they were told to not watch any news, the presumption is they followed that order. Until you have actual evidence of them violating their oath there is no basis to overturn anything.
Click to expand...

Of course the jurors watched the news you moron. Doesn't matter if the judge told them not to. They knew what crazy maxine said.
 
Concart said:
Truth. You reject our intelligence community, our courts and our election system. You reject a free press. You reject our diversity. You hate our institutions and the things that make us strong. You hate America and want to replace it. Guess I hit a nerve.
Click to expand...

You are describing Democrats.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
One small problem with that claim. You have to provide evidence that at least one of the jurors heard Water's statements. Since they were told to not watch any news, the presumption is they followed that order. Until you have actual evidence of them violating their oath there is no basis to overturn anything.
Click to expand...

No proof required. The verdict is tainted.
 
Into the Night Soil
200w.webp


What law is he defying? Oh...right...you just like to insult people.
Click to expand...

Dershowitz supports Izrael's illegal occupation of Palestine and Izrael's breaches of the Geneva Conventions, you ignorant prosemitic sap.
 
.
Well ... there has been a lot of killing the messenger and ignoring the message ... so I'll remind everyone what the topic is supposed to be about ...

Dershowitz says likely Chauvin conviction will be reversed thanx to Maxiine
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
He right. The jurors knew the liberal press would dox them and destroy their lives if they let chauvin go.
Click to expand...

Dershowitz is nothing but a un American right wing extremist POS who was once a so-called successful and brilliant attorney that suddenly for some reason turned un American traitor. Yet it is interesting as to why would he defend a lawlessly hacked in Putin puppet tRump who conspired to covid murder over 500,000 Americans, incite an act of insurrection against the U.S. Capitol and among tRump's other atrocities waged war along with his sewer conspiring repukes to wage war against the 2020 electoral process thus against U.S. Constitutional law. Additionally Dershowitz failed to halt the justified conviction of Chauvin who is in solitary confinement now awaiting sentencing, and Dershowitz should know a automatic appeal in Chauvin's case could cause him to be in prison for a long time awaiting the results of the outcome of that. This is based on the appeared fact that the evidence against Chauvin got a fair trial to which there was no wrong doing at rendering that verdict of guilty on three felonious counts. Also taking the word 'confrontational' out of context is just a squalid attempt to undermine jurisprudence in this case against that murderous trash Chauvin's hide. Nonetheless 200 Constitutional law scholars, in particular, are on to Dershowitz and his un American motives. Get your troll facts straight instead of continuing to making a bungling fool out of yourself:

It’s significant when something stands out in today’s supersonic news cycle. And time seemed to at least slow when Alan Dershowitz offered up his defense of President Trump during the U.S. Senate impeachment trial last week. Part of that defense, in Dershowitz’s words, is that “if a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment.”

Those comments were immediately criticized -- including by a number of law professors at Harvard University, where Dershowitz is Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law Emeritus -- as meaning that a president can do virtually anything, as long as he or she believes it’s in the public interest.

Dershowitz has since said that he was deliberately misinterpreted by his political opponents. He believes that his rivals are smart enough to know what he really meant.

The scale of that opposition -- including some 200 constitutional law scholars who signed on to a letter Friday repudiating his constitutional analysis -- suggests the debate is more complex, however." Yet, despite what Dershowitz thinks in his love affair with a two bit criminal against humanity tRump, tRump as a disgraced and fraudulent one term imposter has been justifiably impeached twice and eventually got the historical over 81 million 2020 voters' boot!

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/02/03/alan-dershowitz-finds-himself-thrust-academes-margins
 
Last edited:
gemini104104 said:
Dershowitz is nothing but a un American right wing extremist POS who was once a so-called successful and brilliant attorney that suddenly for some reason turned un American traitor. Yet it is interesting as to why would he defend a lawlessly hacked in Putin puppet tRump who conspired to covid murder over 500,000 Americans, incite an act of insurrection against the U.S. Capitol and among tRump's other atrocities waged war along with his sewer conspiring repukes to wage war against the 2020 electoral process thus against U.S. Constitutional law. Additionally Dershowitz failed to halt the justified conviction of Chauvin who is in solitary confinement now awaiting sentencing, and Dershowitz should know a automatic appeal in Chauvin's case could cause him to be in prison for a long time awaiting the results of the outcome of that. This is based on the appeared fact that the evidence against Chauvin got a fair trial to which there was no wrong doing at rendering that verdict of guilty on three felonious counts. Also taking the word 'confrontational' out of context is just a squalid attempt to undermine jurisprudence in this case against that murderous trash Chauvin's hide. Nonetheless 200 Constitutional law scholars, in particular, are on to Dershowitz and his un American motives. Get your troll facts straight instead of continuing to making a bungling fool out of yourself:

It’s significant when something stands out in today’s supersonic news cycle. And time seemed to at least slow when Alan Dershowitz offered up his defense of President Trump during the U.S. Senate impeachment trial last week. Part of that defense, in Dershowitz’s words, is that “if a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment.”

Those comments were immediately criticized -- including by a number of law professors at Harvard University, where Dershowitz is Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law Emeritus -- as meaning that a president can do virtually anything, as long as he or she believes it’s in the public interest.

Dershowitz has since said that he was deliberately misinterpreted by his political opponents. He believes that his rivals are smart enough to know what he really meant.

The scale of that opposition -- including some 200 constitutional law scholars who signed on to a letter Friday repudiating his constitutional analysis -- suggests the debate is more complex, however." Yet, despite what Dershowitz thinks in his love affair with a two bit criminal against humanity tRump, tRump as a disgraced and fraudulent one term imposter has been justifiably impeached twice and eventually got the historical over 81 million 2020 voters' boot!

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/02/03/alan-dershowitz-finds-himself-thrust-academes-margins
Click to expand...

This TRIPE is from ... February 3, 2020 ... I guess I need to remind you that this thread concerns Alan's statement on April 20, 2021. I'm not sure of your math skills but that is a difference of ... ONE YEAR, TWO MONTHS AND SEVENTEEN DAYS.

Silly me ... you probably believe that ford woman-person ...

O well
 
Primavera said:
She detests Dershowitz because he's Jewish and supports Israel as do over 90% of Jews. Ignore the cunt!
Click to expand...

' Jewish ' is nothing to do with it, maggot, you smear-mongering scum-sac.
Neither does ' Israel ' per se. It's Neo-Zionism which is obnoxious, illegal and a threat to the entire world community.
However, a eurotophobic pea-brain such as yourself cannot be expected to differentiate between a fucking country and a dirty doctrine.
Go kick a refugee.


Haw, haw..........................................haw.

th
 
Grumpy said:


This TRIPE is from ... February 3, 2020 ... I guess I need to remind you that this thread concerns Alan's statement on April 20, 2021. I'm not sure of your math skills but that is a difference of ... ONE YEAR, TWO MONTHS AND SEVENTEEN DAYS.

Silly me ... you probably believe that ford woman-person ...

O well
Click to expand...

What's the matter, did that apparent supersonic speed of facts and the reality of it all put your un American panties in a uproar? Oh well, that's the way it goes.
 
This is not the first time Democracy has come under attack and like before over 200 years, I do not think a dried up fossil Dershowitz who has the character of a gutter legacy of the jew mob that violated the legacy and property of the U.S., and the decency of the American Jewish heritage, deserves to come up on some form of accountability. This as a result of this creep Dershowitz's attempt to engage in his own act of waging war against the U.S., and just before his time is up based on natural causes to join his un Godly gutter hero tRump at a burning hell fire for a eternity. Maxine Waters is more of a States Lady, hero and true American than the sewer conspiring and un American POS Dershowitz can ever compare.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top