These are the claims Powell made in her lawsuit against Georgia. It is not selective reading but only a portion of those lies she told. I did not include all the other lies which can easily be read in her lawsuit.
"Smartmatic and Dominion were founded by foreign oligarchs and dictators to ensure computerized ballot-stuffing and vote manipulation to whatever level was needed to make certain Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez never lost another election."
HAHAHA. What you mean is 60 courts refused to even look at the evidence. They knew the tv networks would blast them if they exposed all the democrat vote-stealing.
Contextomy fallacy (again).
No, it was not out of context. It was directly from the lawsuit and the remaining material listed additional claims she made about Dominion--material she is now trying to claim she was not serious about although it was part of her suit.
Contextomy fallacy.
Explain the context in which the following was written. If you know it is a contextomy fallacy you must know the proper context.
""Smartmatic and Dominion were founded by foreign oligarchs and dictators to ensure computerized ballot-stuffing and vote manipulation to whatever level was needed to make certain Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez never lost another election."
Into the Night 12/31
Currently, it looks like GA is going to choose Republican electors.
AZ looks like it might also, but seems to be further away from actually choosing
RQAA.
Agreed. If you do not know the context of something, you cannot know that it is out of context.
Word salad. Try English. It works better.
OK. Powell's quote was not out of context. You would know that if you read the entire lawsuit.
Now she is claiming nobody took her lies seriously. She is right about that. But she has also said she still believes all that crap.
You are taking it out of context. Contextomy fallacy.
She did not claim Dominion was involved in Venezuela?