Russian interference in 2020 fails miserably
- Thread starter Concart
- Start date
Can't answer, can you? You fucking rubes are so stupid, you believe people like Anatta, and you repeat the shit he says. That's why the Russians are so successful. Useful idiots like you.
they are consistently wrong. they lied about "Russian collusion", they interfered in Ukraine politics (Euromaidan)
and then blame "da Russians" for the police riot.
They are still trying to get the Kilimnik story out he was a Russin "proxie" - ignoring the fact he worked for Ukraine
and was a state dept asset.
They lied about Qadaffi bombing civilians ( albeit with Hillary and Rice's help) and caused the destruction
of the Libyan state - which became "ISIS by the Sea"
They want us at a proxie war with Russia over Donbass. You can have these jingoistic monsters.
oh and dont forget "Russian bounties"" they put in the PDF
BeBestBiden
Verified User
A Russan must pay! Mr. Joseph Biden will bomb them and a war will start and many dead but that is okay! Mr. Joseph Biden is a n FDR!
They are consistently wrong when measured against what? Breitbart? ROTFLMFAO!!!! You are such a fucking twit.
you are so willingly stoopid, unable to do any research you think I am quoting Brietbart.
How about those "Russian bounties" they had to walk back?? moron
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
They are consistently wrong when measured against facts and history.
The AP and Hillary lied about Khaddaffi to justify his murder, plunging Libya into an ISIS turf war.
I even know why they did it.
Think about it, Obama was taking selfies with Khaddafi and having sleepovers with him a few short months before all this happened.
I found that odd, so did some digging.
On a similar line..
Assad didn't use chemical weapons on his own people or the rebels.
Russians tracked the "rebels" (ISIS) to a warehouse in a district and called in an air strike where all the rats were gathered.
It turned out to be a chemical weapons dump and all the crap got released when they bombed it.
The AP told a much different story.
Last edited:
LOL again. They didn't walk it back. They stated a confidence level. That's what the intelligence community does. Research? I trust the intelligence community to do that for me. I have no reason to doubt them, and a million reasons to doubt you. You're a paid liar.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
Demmycrat claims that Trump colluded with the Russians in 2016 failed miserably in 2017-2020......their claims he did so again in 2020 will fail miserably again in 2021-2024......even if they repeach him a few more times......
No, they aren't. This is why there is no discussion with you morons. You won't accept institutions as sources of truth. There is nothing to talk about.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
you demmycunts have HAD the US intelligence community since 2015.......and we now we all know they made it all up.......where've you been?.....
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
you're the same rube who believed what the US intelligence community said about the 2016 election.....we now know they bought their info from the DNC......why are you stupid enough to believe it twice?.....
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
they stated there was no confidence level and that the dumbfucks on the left who published it as news were idiots......that's what the intelligence community did......
ROFL
they changed it to "Low confidence" which is walking it back from the hype they were peddling in the PDF
The fact you "trust" the IC shows you are incapable of independent thought -a typical Biden clown
here's another goodie. remember all the former ICs that said the Hunter laptop was Russian dezinformatsiya
about 50 of those worthless drones quickly jumped up to squash the story
Turn out it was his laptop . *oh snap*
BAC and myself did a shitload of independent research on the Libyan lie -not "Brietbart"
and we figured it out quickly for what it was. Regime change al la Madeline Albright "Responsibility to protect"
these people are unrepentant Russiaphobes and war pigs, while missing the big threats of 9-11
and lying us to war in Iraq.
It's amazing you trust ANYTHING they say. If you did your own research you wouldn't have to trust anyone
but you are too intellectually lazy and a partisan stooge to boot
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Argument from authority fallacy. Just because an "expert" claims something without evidence, that doesn't make it true.
So sorry I don't take the "minister of truth's" word.
And who do you trust? That's just a stupid and lazy argument. You are telling me why my ABSOLUTELY RELIABLE source is wrong without telling me what your source is. Because you don't have one, except for the instructions you receive with your paycheck. You are irrelevant. A total paid partisan hack with no credibility.
why do you "accept" anything?
dont you get the fact the DoJ and IC are politicized like EVERYTHING ELSE?
you are the very worst sort who refuses to dig, then passes along this tripe like it was gospel
They have evidence you stupid fucking knuckledragging moron.
No, I don't because they aren't. See how easy that is?
i use all kinds of sources, I dig and I put it together.
I've used so many I cant even recall- nor would I give you the courtesy of listing them to your uncritical mind
Nothing is "absolutely reliable" - you have the world at your fingertips. you refuse to use it and then you whine about it when others show what a fool you are for blind acceptance