Russian interference in 2020 fails miserably

Hello Micawber,

Micawber said:
Putin wants a weakened, divided and ineffectual USA with no power in global affairs. He has successfully joined the effort to create a grievance class
of rural peasants who don't want policy, just personalities who will lie, slash and burn in a full time effort to destroy Democrats,
presently the sole intelligent governing edifice of US government.

Putin and Trumpers want exactly the same thing. Putin couldn't have scripted the trash the Capitol escapade better.

Thankfully the sane intelligent patriots far outnumber the cow tipping crowd.
Click to expand...

:hand:

If Democrats had cozied up with Russia?

Obama?

Hillary?

:rolleyes:

We would never have heard the end of it.
 
Darth Omar said:
They will believe whatever they’re told to believe lol.

Good point about ‘they can’t prove anything’. It’s almost like a religious claim in that sense.

What does it mean that ‘Russia influenced the election’? How would you even begin to quantify ‘influence’? Unless, they are talking about changing votes—which they are not. It’s like global warming. How do you prove what the state of the future climate will be without some sort of supernatural power?

Another good point about Assange:

It’s telling that Mullet wouldn’t interview *the one person* that knew whether it was a leak or a hack. Shouldn’t Assange be *the first person* interviewed since it involved Wiki Leaks?

Not in Mullets world.

The whole charade was the definition of a politically driven witch hunt. They knew there was no collusion—the point of the investigation was to provoke Trump into obstructing it. It almost worked.
Click to expand...
all you have to say is "Da Russians influenced" and the Russiaphobes have an attack of the vapors
womanfainting.jpg
 
Presently if you want a job in Republican politics you must kiss the ring of an incompetent psychopathic greedy criminal who is hated by the large majority of US citizens and the world at large.
Such is the state of the Republican party. Despite that he is a drag on their numbers they sojourn to Mara Lago like a cross between a pilgrim hajj and a Duke sorority slut coming home
at 10:00 from a frat house with last night's clothes on.

The Republican party is hostage to fascist right wing crazies who worship a nutjob.
 
Last edited:
anatta said:
Oh so we just decide "he needs to die" and use a false flag operation that he was bombing civilians to do it?
Click to expand...

Actually, the Libyan people decided Gaddafi had to die. They rebelled against his tyranny, remember? They actually killed him. Americans certainly were out to get him at the same time... But it was the Libyans who did it.

Are you claiming that half century of Gaddafi terrorism acts were all false flag operations? That would be the longest series of false flag operations to kill one man ever. And if Obama is behind them all, he started it before he even entered elementary school.
 
Walt said:
190 on Pan Am 103 alone, and there were other terrorist attacks.



I know your Russian propaganda sources have instructed you to defend Gaddafi, but he was a very bad person. He was far more a supporter of anti-American terrorism than Saddam ever was.
Click to expand...

You're blaming that on Khaddafi? Seriously? ISIS with weapons provided by our government and Hillary Clinton did that.

Khaddafi didn't like ISIS. Obama did.
 
Matt Dillon said:
You're blaming that on Khaddafi? Seriously? ISIS with weapons provided by our government and Hillary Clinton did that.

Khaddafi didn't like ISIS. Obama did.
Click to expand...

ISIS did Pan Am 103? With Hillary's help?

ROTLFMFAO!!!!! Damn Sheriff you've said some stupid shit but that one takes the cake.
 
Walt said:
I know your Russian propaganda sources have instructed you to defend Gaddafi, but he was a very bad person. He was far more a supporter of anti-American terrorism than Saddam ever was.
Click to expand...
stoopid.
when NATO went after Qadaffi, they were SUPPORTING TERRORISTS!
the NTC and the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group were domestic and international terrorists.
This is the bunch we were backing against Qadaffi:
Libyan Islamic Fighting Group - a Libyan terrorist group organized in 1995 and aligned with al-Qaeda;
seeks to radicalize the Libyan government; attempted to assassinate Qaddafi
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/Libyan+Islamic+Fighting+Group
Click to expand...
You act like Lockerbie was the end of the story -it was a turning point instead for Qadaffi

https://www.hrw.org/node/248708/printable/print
Qadaffi handed over the Lockerbie suspects for trial, expelling Abu Nidal’s organisation and ending support for Hamas and Hezbollah, steps that helped secure the suspension of UN sanctions in 1999.

The 9/11 attacks were also highly significant in triggering a reassessment of UK policy toward Libya.
Gaddafi moved quickly to condemn the terrorist attacks on the US and exploited the moment to assert that the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) was not just a serious threat to him but to the world, emphasising its links to Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan.
 
Walt said:
Actually, the Libyan people decided Gaddafi had to die. They rebelled against his tyranny, remember? They actually killed him. Americans certainly were out to get him at the same time... But it was the Libyans who did it.

Are you claiming that half century of Gaddafi terrorism acts were all false flag operations? That would be the longest series of false flag operations to kill one man ever. And if Obama is behind them all, he started it before he even entered elementary school.
Click to expand...
you fucking idiot.
it was a revolt by terrorists ( out of the east/Bengazi)
that turned into the civil war, that continues to this day with the factions still at odds.

Bengazi has Hiftar, Tripoli has UN backing..
the country is torn apart as well by outside powers like Turkey, Qatar and Egypt and Russia.

We facilitated and created a civil war that wrecked Libya and turned it into a failed terrorist ridden state.
Your hero Hillary and Susan Rice are up to their eyeballs in blood.
They turned the "no fly zone" into an all out military assault

Bengazi and Tripoli are 2 different factions - still are and Bengazi is where the revolt started.
Until the NTC took Sirte and Misrata those cities as well as Tripoli backed Qadaffi.

it was NOT A POPULAR REVOLT -the NTC/LIFG never picked up any popular support as they gained territory
It was not "the Libyan people" that backed the revolt -just the armed terrorists "beasts from the east"
as Qadaffi called them

Once Qadaffi was killed the NTC took power, and started the militias to run the security of the country.
Militia rules led to the breakdown of the country into local warring factions
 
Matt Dillon said:
Walt said:
190 on Pan Am 103 alone, and there were other terrorist attacks.
Click to expand...
You're blaming that on Khaddafi? Seriously? ISIS with weapons provided by our government and Hillary Clinton did that.

Khaddafi didn't like ISIS. Obama did.
Click to expand...

The terrorist attack on Pan Am 103 happened in 1988. Al Qaeda had just formed, and ISIS had not formed within Al Qaeda. They were not doing operations outside of the Afghanistan area. Clinton was a corporate lawyer married to the Governor of Arkansas.

The problem with your attempt to defend Gaddafi is his long history. He was a terrorist for 50 years. You need to prove 50 years of terrorism to be a lie. Pan Am 103 was a response to Reagan's bombing of Libya, are you willing to side with a terrorist over Reagan?

Obama hit ISIS repeatedly hard, and did the absolute opposite of supporting it. Clinton did not give them weapons, they were in a part of the world with a lot of weapons.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top