How was he framed?
Now it's 'dangerous,' we are told, to stop Dems from overthrowing the American people
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
How was he framed?
No, you're thinking of the Second Amendment people.
And you and your "very fine people" are the cop killers:
Far-right ‘boogaloo boys’ linked to killing of California law officers and other violence
https://www.latimes.com/california/...o-killing-of-california-lawmen-other-violence
You're the ones who want to repeal the 14th Amendment while also changing the Constitution to ban gay marriage and flag burning.
Then how come all you've done about that is shitpost on JPP?
You're the one who lied about COVID for three months, turning it into a pandemic that killed 600,000 people.
I thought flags were just flags that didn't carry any meaning or significance?
You're the one who doesn't want to punish employers for hiring undocumented workers.
How can you spit on a song?
And it was Roseanne Barr, one of your "very fine people" and fervent Trump supporter, who "spit on the anthem" years ago.
What is the lie that children are being told in our education system about our history?
Here's what's going to happen...
I will have responded to each of your points here, and you will then proceed to ignore all those responses while saying at the same time that no one is debunking them. OR you'll just steal a post from someone else and copy and paste it here.
Chump.
Last edited:
1) Your tantrums debunk nothing, except the notion that you are capable of adult-level discourse.
2) When there is a far more plausible explanation for something (such as that people are naturally turned off by having 50 posts to respond to every time they say something, all of which contain nothing but the same repetitive, debunked fallacies over and over again), introducing empty ad hominem fallacies (such as 'you must be too afraid to repeatedly humiliate my moronic attempts to spam you, yeah that's it') just makes you look weak and desperate.
Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1
Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:
-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).
-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.
-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?
-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.
-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.
Someone is bitter.
Have I touched a nerve?
1) Providing links is called "backing up your arguments with verifiable facts."
You should try it sometime.
2) I did write most of what I posted. Jumping to even more erroneous conclusions than you already have, again based on no evidence, just further highlights how unable to reason you are.
3) Even if I copied and pasted other people's arguments, nothing about that would ever logically indicate that I cannot also believe the things I posted. That doesn't even make sense on its face.
Your logic here is complete trash, as usual.
Um...of course, the laws of mathematics literally leave no other possibility.
And was vindicated when it came out that that intelligence community colluded with Russia to frame him. It is now a matter of record that our politicized, weaponized, partisan FBI and DOJ (thanks to the ACORN president) doctored the evidence and lied to a federal judge, as well as illegally spied on President Trump to set up the frame job. Correctly criticizing an Intelligence Community that has provably rigged the evidence against you is a GOOD thing, dumb-ass.
Ah, the left's beloved fallacy of citing completely unrelated events decades before their own catastrophic policy disasters, to make it look like someone other than Democrats was incompetent.
Our enemies were fighting each other in the 1980s, arming them against each other MADE SENSE, imbecile.
No part of Reagan doing the right thing lets Democrats off the hook for eight years of groveling, appeasing, and surrendering to al Qaida once they were attacking us.
Try again, dishonest demagogue.
Back when it MADE SENSE, yes. Democrats arm our enemies when it HURTS us. Non-traitors arm them when they are fighting our OTHER enemies. In other words, Democrats are still the only people betraying the country.
Comprehend it yet?
Democrats spent Bush's entire presidency demanding that he negotiate with terrorists...the moment he found a terrorist leader who wanted to rejoin the world and repent, and started re-normalizing relations, Democrats did a total 180, accused Republicans of "playing footsie" with a terrorist leader (just like they had just spent nearly a decade demanding that Republicans do), and assassinated the one repentant terrorist leader in existence.
Bringing this up helps MY argument (that Democrats are backward traitors), not yours, you fucking idiot.
Again, just following YEARS of Democrat demands that we negotiate with North Korea, which Democrats responded to by instantly reversing course and condemning it.
Relations with China would never have been strained in the first place if Democrats hadn't betrayed our allies and let the communists take over their country.
Um...doctoring evidence, lying to a federal judge, illegally spying on a rival candidate to set up the frame job (a thousand times worse than Watergate), colluding with Russia to manufacture phony evidence to make it look real, etc.
Otherwise known as straight-up treason.
Show us. I've posted hundreds upon hundreds of Democrat terrorist attacks. If you are going to flat-out lie to distract from the treasonous conduct of your crime family party, then be prepared to get called out as a liar on this as well. Prove that anyone other than Democrats is regularly attacking courthouses, cops, capitals, INS facilities.
1) Trump Didn't Call Neo-Nazis 'Fine People.' Here's Proof
I'm sorry, what were you lying?
2) Even if this weren't long-debunked as one of the Democrats' myriad of fake news hoaxes invented out of thin air to smear their opponents of what only they do (only Democrats embrace racist lunatics and terrorists), randomly changing the subject to this is blatant deflection.
3) The fact that you resorted to using a debunked hoax for your diversion makes the fallacy you're using THIS TIME a red herring.
Next lie please.
1) The 14th Amendment was illegally ratified at the tip of a bayonet. It also inverts completely bastardizes the entire federalist structure of government (at least the way Democrats now deliberately misinterpret it).
Of course it should be repealed.
2) Wanting to amend the Constitution (what Republicans want) is nothing like Democrats disobeying the Constitution, idiot. Try again.
Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1
Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:
-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).
-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.
-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?
-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.
-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.
1) This lie has literally nothing to do with what you're bringing it up to distract from.
2) Democrats swearing an oath to enforce the law under the Constitution and then refusing to enforce, for instance, our immigration laws...THAT is violating your oath, dumb-ass.
3) Trying to blame anyone but Democrats for how COVID has been handled is laughably, provably false.
Again...
-Democrats violated every COVID restriction to help BLM and Antifa burn the country down over a lie.
-Democrats caused the mask shortage.
-Democrats caused the ventilator shortage.
-Democrats put bureaucratic FDA red tape in the way of responding to this crisis.
-Democrats opposed the China travel ban that saved thousands of American lives.
-Democrats attacked President Trump as overreacting in the beginning and demanded that he prioritize the flu instead.
-Democrats were downplaying COVID and telling everyone to live their lives normally as recently as March.
-Democrats spent the first months of this pandemic diverting all the federal resources they could to impeachment.
-Democrats wasted critical time and resources blocking emergency relief to stuff the bill with taxpayer-funded power grabs and handouts for their donors.
-Democrats are lying to make the most prepared country on the planet look unprepared.
Even pathologists and other experts from the NY Times, World Health Organization, Stanford and Oxford researchers, and anti-Trump critics were forced to praise President Trump's aggressively proactive handling of COVID, to thank him for saving their own lives personally, to admit that his China travel ban (which Democrats opposed) worked, to admit that Democrat governors incompetently botched COVID, and to admit that this "crisis" is wildly exaggerated and fake.
California's Gavin Newsom even stated:
“Let me just be candid with you. I’d be lying to you to say that [Trump] hasn’t been responsive to our needs. He has. And so, as a sort of an offer of objectivity, I have to acknowledge that publicly...The fact is, every time that I've called the president, he's quickly gotten on the line. When we asked to get the support for that [USNS] Mercy ship in Southern California, he was able to direct that in real-time. We've got 2,000 of these field medical sites that are up, almost all operational now in the state, because of his support. Those are the facts."
The timeline reveals what a massive lie Democrats are trying to spread.
Next lie please.
Angry Crowd In Minnesota Shouts ‘USA!’ After Council Bans Pledge Of Allegiance Because Of Diversity, Illegal Immigrants
College Bans Pledge of Allegiance Because of 'White Nationalism' and 'Nativism'
Calif. board of trustees scraps Pledge of Allegiance over 'white nationalism' history
Judges ban Pledge of Allegiance from Schools
Again we see that the person childishly lashing out before doing five seconds of homework on Google ends up humiliating themselves for approximately the billionth time by turning out to be the only person lying.
Another blatant lie (do you EVER tell the truth?). No one here ever said anything like that. You don't just get to make up whatever you feel like, childish imbecile.
Try again.
1) Pretending it was meant literally? THAT'S all you've got? What are you nine years old?
2) Changing the subject to some random person who failed to take the Anthem seriously gets Democrats off the hook for deliberately disrespecting it at every turn?
Garbage logic, as always.
The only way you can object to Democrat Neanderthals tearing down our history like the Taliban tearing down all non-Islamic monuments, like ignorant, rampaging bigots...is if you root for the long-destroyed Confederacy?
Again, superb, unassailable logic there, brainiac.
The 1619 Project. The New York Times-led Democrat attempt to hijack grade school education with the deliberate falsehood that everything in American history revolves around slavery...including the Revolutionary War, which had literally NOTHING to do with slavery. Marxist lunatics, supported by Democrats, attempting to brainwash an entire generation, and historians on both sides condemn it as an outright lie.
1) *
2) Look at that, another blatantly incorrect Democrat prediction.
Says the guy humiliating himself with ignorant misinformation at every turn.
Says the guy humiliating himself with ignorant misinformation at every turn.
Wow...everything you wrote here in response to me was garbage you stole from other people because you can't make an argument on your own.
Sad.
So...just make shit up, deflect, and pretend you weren't destroyed.
Shittiest debater in history.
