Federal judge rules Rachel Maddow's show is not legitimate news

[artichoke]

As if we needed to hear anyone else say it, even an Obama-appointed federal judge has now ruled that Rachel Maddow's show and parent company cannot be sued for blatantly lying about people because it is clear to anyone who watches her show that it is "make up whatever we feel like" opinion instead of fact-based reporting.

"The Obama-appointed judge Cynthia Bashant dismissed the defamation lawsuit on the grounds that Maddow’s audience knows she’s hyperpartisan, and thus, as Greenwald put it, that her audience “understands that her show consists of exaggeration, hyperbole, and pure opinion, and therefore would not assume that such outlandish accusations are factually true even when she uses the language of certainty and truth when presenting them"

Judge Rules Rachel Maddow's Show Isn't News​

 

[Hawkeye10]

How often is this woman right about anything?

 

[Hawkeye10]

She reminds me of Ellen...a marketing con job aimed at the rubes.

 

[Hoosier Daddy]

As if we needed to hear anyone else say it, even an Obama-appointed federal judge has now ruled that Rachel Maddow's show and parent company cannot be sued for blatantly lying about people because it is clear to anyone who watches her show that it is "make up whatever we feel like" opinion instead of fact-based reporting.

"The Obama-appointed judge Cynthia Bashant dismissed the defamation lawsuit on the grounds that Maddow’s audience knows she’s hyperpartisan, and thus, as Greenwald put it, that her audience “understands that her show consists of exaggeration, hyperbole, and pure opinion, and therefore would not assume that such outlandish accusations are factually true even when she uses the language of certainty and truth when presenting them"

Judge Rules Rachel Maddow's Show Isn't News​

do you even have a fucking clue what irony means? you are trying to say Maddow is not factual by using PJ MEDIA AS A SOURCE!!!! a piece of shit lying right wing media site that almost never tells the truth. here is an excerpt from what the Judge said-

Maddow does not keep her political views a secret, and therefore, audiences could expect her to use subjective language that comports with her political opinions.

Thus, Maddow’s show is different than a typical news segment where anchors inform viewers about the daily news. The point of Maddow’s show is for her to provide the news but also to offer her opinions as to that news.

but her opinions are based on fact, whereas the shit spewing from trump and tucker and hannity and savage and PJ media are total bullshit based on bullshit. Carlson recently said all the unnamed conspirators in that crowd of goons who attacked the capitol were FBI agents, and they forced those trump thugs to do the deed.

look at the stupid fuck lying articles on PJ Media and then be embarrassed at what a hypocritical piece of shit you are to even dare complain about Maddow.

 

[artichoke]

How often is this woman right about anything?

A pathologically dishonest demagogue and traitor to this country.

 

[artichoke]

She reminds me of Ellen...a marketing con job aimed at the rubes.

Absolutely.

 

[Hawkeye10]

do you even have a fucking clue what irony means? you are trying to say Maddow is not factual by using PJ MEDIA AS A SOURCE!!!! a piece of shit lying right wing media site that almost never tells the truth. here is an excerpt from what the Judge said-

Maddow does not keep her political views a secret, and therefore, audiences could expect her to use subjective language that comports with her political opinions.

Thus, Maddow’s show is different than a typical news segment where anchors inform viewers about the daily news. The point of Maddow’s show is for her to provide the news but also to offer her opinions as to that news.

but her opinions are based on fact, whereas the shit spewing from trump and tucker and hannity and savage and PJ media are total bullshit based on bullshit. Carlson recently said all the unnamed conspirators in that crowd of goons who attacked the capitol were FBI agents, and they forced those trump thugs to do the deed.

look at the stupid fuck lying articles on PJ Media and then be embarrassed at what a hypocritical piece of shit you are to even dare complain about Maddow.

What was the last major thing she was right about that the consensus was not right about?

 

[martin]

Declaring the obvious. Does anyone think Hannity is any different? None of the political talk shows on MSNBC, FOX, CNN and elsewhere are news.

 

[Hawkeye10]

Declaring the obvious. Does anyone think Hannity is any different? None of the political talk shows on MSNBC, FOX, CNN and elsewhere are news.

Whatever.....but this mouthy cunt rarely seems to be right.

That's a problem.

 

[artichoke]

do you even have a fucking clue what irony means? you are trying to say Maddow is not factual by using PJ MEDIA AS A SOURCE!!!!

1) We've identified our first Maddow viewer.

2) So the federal judge DIDN'T rule that Maddow was obviously not legitimate news? Or you just don't have a counterpoint so you're resorting to personal attacks?

...a piece of shit lying right wing media site that almost never tells the truth.

PJ Media was proven right, and Rachel Maddow was proven wrong on:

-the "Trump cleared out a protest to give a speech" hoax
-the Russia collusion hoax
-the "Trump told people to drink Lysol" hoax
-the Covington Catholic hoax
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax
-the Hydroxchloroquine hoax
-the Jussie Smollett hoax
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax
-the Ukraine transcript hoax
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax
-the Trayvon Martin hoax
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax
-the "children in cages" hoax
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax
-the "Muslim ban" hoax
-the global warming "consensus" hoax
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax
-the "white privilege" hoax
-the voter suppression hoax
-the "hands up don't shoot" hoax
-the "Trump called soldiers losers" hoax
-the "peaceful protesters" hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi eagle" hoax
-the "Trump ignored Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers" hoax
-the coronavirus hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi red triangle" hoax
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax

Seems to me YOU'RE the one using garbage "news" sources, as even an Obama-appointed federal judge now confirms.

here is an excerpt from what the Judge said-

Maddow does not keep her political views a secret, and therefore, audiences could expect her to use subjective language that comports with her political opinions.

And? Thanks for verifying that the judge ruled she was an opinion-spewing non-journalist.



Next hyperventilating nutjob tantrum please.

 

[Noking]

Then is Sean Hannity, or Tucker Carson news????????????????????

 

[artichoke]

What was the last major thing she was right about that the consensus was not right about?

 

[Noking]

1) We've identified our first Maddow viewer.

2) So the federal judge DIDN'T rule that Maddow was obviously not legitimate news? Or you just don't have a counterpoint so you're resorting to personal attacks?



PJ Media was proven right, and Rachel Maddow was proven wrong on:

-the "Trump cleared out a protest to give a speech" hoax
-the Russia collusion hoax
-the "Trump told people to drink Lysol" hoax
-the Covington Catholic hoax
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax
-the Hydroxchloroquine hoax
-the Jussie Smollett hoax
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax
-the Ukraine transcript hoax
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax
-the Trayvon Martin hoax
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax
-the "children in cages" hoax
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax
-the "Muslim ban" hoax
-the global warming "consensus" hoax
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax
-the "white privilege" hoax
-the voter suppression hoax
-the "hands up don't shoot" hoax
-the "Trump called soldiers losers" hoax
-the "peaceful protesters" hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi eagle" hoax
-the "Trump ignored Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers" hoax
-the coronavirus hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi red triangle" hoax
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax

YOU'RE the one using garbage "news" sources, as even an Obama-appointed federal judge now confirms.



And? Thanks for verifying that the judge ruled she was an opinion-spewing non-journalist.

PJ Media

Overall, we rate PJ Media to be Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, as well as numerous failed fact checks.


Questionable Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/pj-media/

 

[artichoke]

Declaring the obvious. Does anyone think Hannity is any different? None of the political talk shows on MSNBC, FOX, CNN and elsewhere are news.

No. Conservatives are the only people who readily acknowledge the difference between opinion journalists and objective journalists. Democrats constantly try to use obvious pundits like Hannity to argue that FOX is even in the BALLPARK of the left's obscenely dishonest and biased media sources...ignoring the fact that FOX includes far more Democrat viewpoints than vice-versa, and that FOX has been proven right far more often than left-wing media outlets. Failing to comprehend when a source is an opinion journalist, which is not to be held to the same standard as an objective journalist...is a uniquely DEMOCRAT problem.




That's what makes this so hilarious...it's further confirmation that the left's hysterical conspiracy theory-pushing tabloid trash "journalists" are total garbage, whereas Democrats consider them legitimate news.

 

[Hoosier Daddy]

What was the last major thing she was right about that the consensus was not right about?

how dangerous covid was, we should wear masks and social distance, the malaria drug is bullshit, there is no windmill cancer, we should not inject bleach, covid will disappear by Easter, 2020, there was no damn voter fraud....

if by consensus you mean the consensus of dumbfuck trump stooges.

 

[artichoke]

Whatever.....but this mouthy cunt rarely seems to be right.

That's a problem.

Not if you're a Democrat. You can be wrong all the time and not be held accountable if you're a Democrat.

These are the embarrassing imbeciles who assured us:

-that repealing Net Neutrality would wreck the Internet,
-that Trump would resign or be removed from office,
-that the stock market would crash if Trump were elected,
-that you could keep your doctor,
-that Trump would never get the nomination,
-that cutting taxes (or as Pelosi called it, "Armageddon") would resurrect the Great Depression and murder 10,000 people per year,
-that Obamacare would make health care more affordable,
-that Republicans would take away Medicare and Social Security benefits,
-that Trump will bring back slavery,
-that Trump had virtually zero chance to ever beat Hillary,
-that Republicans would ban contraceptives and the imaginary women's health care provided by Planned Parenthood,
-that it was impossible to bring manufacturing jobs back,
-that Trump will start WWIII,
-that confirming Betsy DeVos as Education secretary would end public education in America,
-more than 40 different wildly erroneous global warming apocalypse predictions,
-that fighting back against unfair trade deals would destroy the economy.

 

[Hawkeye10]

how dangerous covid was, we should wear masks and social distance, the malaria drug is bullshit, there is no windmill cancer, we should not inject bleach, covid will disappear by Easter, 2020, there was no damn voter fraud....

if by consensus you mean the consensus of dumbfuck trump stooges.

In other words I wont hear anything from her that I wont hear from all of the other corporate media WOKE shills...

So what would be the point of listening to her?

 

[artichoke]

Then is Sean Hannity, or Tucker Carson news????????????????????

They're opinion journalists, just like Maddow, only with a far less humiliating record of asserting things.

Only Democrats fail to comprehend the difference between opinion journalism and objective journalism.

Nice attempted Whataboutism deflection, by the way.

 

[Hawkeye10]

Not if you're a Democrat. You can be wrong all the time and not be held accountable if you're a Democrat.

These are the embarrassing imbeciles who assured us:

-that repealing Net Neutrality would wreck the Internet,
-that Trump would resign or be removed from office,
-that the stock market would crash if Trump were elected,
-that you could keep your doctor,
-that Trump would never get the nomination,
-that cutting taxes (or as Pelosi called it, "Armageddon") would resurrect the Great Depression and murder 10,000 people per year,
-that Obamacare would make health care more affordable,
-that Republicans would take away Medicare and Social Security benefits,
-that Trump will bring back slavery,
-that Trump had virtually zero chance to ever beat Hillary,
-that Republicans would ban contraceptives and the imaginary women's health care provided by Planned Parenthood,
-that it was impossible to bring manufacturing jobs back,
-that Trump will start WWIII,
-that confirming Betsy DeVos as Education secretary would end public education in America,
-more than 40 different wildly erroneous global warming apocalypse predictions,
-that fighting back against unfair trade deals would destroy the economy.

THe Regressives claim up and down that the truth does not exist...so go figure.

 

[artichoke]

PJ Media

Overall, we rate PJ Media to be Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, as well as numerous failed fact checks.


Questionable Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/pj-media/

"Attack the Source" fallacy.

If you can't refute the claim, then just admit it, don't resort to this phony charade of using fake left-wing "authorities" to prop up your diversionary disqualification smears.