Biden On Second Amendment

archives said:
Actually Scalia, the right's and gun nuts hero on the Court, said the same thing at the end of his Majority Opinion in the Heller case, difference is he used bazooka and not cannon
Click to expand...

You can buy a bazooka. Here's a video on it. The one in the video was for sale...

 
Hoosier Daddy said:
do you ignore the fact fully auto machine guns have been banned from private ownership without special conditions for decades and decades? and scalia was writing along with the majority of how of course society has the right to control what kind of lethal weapons individuals can possess.
Click to expand...

I REPEAT!!!! Just because YOU agree with it and LET them do it, does not mean it's constitutional. I find it hilarious that all you leftist morons absolutely HATED Scalia, yet you practically worship this one, single, opinion as the holy grail over the 2nd Amendment.........you sheepishly accept it because you're a fucking antigun coward. You IGNORE the glaring FACT that I can buy a machine gun if it was manufactured on, or before, May 18th, 1986. But if it was manufactured on, or after, May 19th, 1986, then somehow that very same item suddenly becomes prohibited............there is NOT ONE SINGLE, CREDIBLE, CONSTITUTIONAL ARGUMENT TO BE MADE FOR THAT DISTINCTION. NOT A SINGLE ONE. It all comes down to pussies like you who are terrified of guns
 
Hoosier Daddy said:
not from the day it was passed. but, of course, later on, when "arms" of war became so lethal that only idiots might believe any citizens can own them. in reality, he was a little bit right. the second amendment said nothing about any private citizens right to bear arms, just those in a well-regulated militia. back then, guns were necessary to most Americans, for protection, hunting, etc. They would not try to ban them. cannons, not so much....if enough yahoos had bought cannons and killed a bunch of kids in schools, or a bunch of co-workers, then cannons would have been banned back then, too.

stupid ass.
Click to expand...

Denial of the Constitution of the United States. Denial of the constitutions of the States. We know you don't like republics. That's why you support the Oligarchy, and the fascism and communism that comes with it. Go fuck yourself.
 
Jade Dragon said:
Well, certain guns and weapons have been restricted since their inception. Even certain types of bayonets had been banned after war. Normally the banned stuff was created solely for the military. Those type of things really aren't designed for civilians as you need special training. Hasn't stopped arms manufacturers from mimicking military weapons.
Click to expand...

Unconstitutional.
 
Hoosier Daddy said:
do you ignore the fact fully auto machine guns have been banned from private ownership without special conditions for decades and decades?
Click to expand...
Unconstitutional. The 2nd amendment does not list any weapon by type, brand, type of action, size, looks, or lethality.
Hoosier Daddy said:
and scalia was writing along with the majority of how of course society has the right to control what kind of lethal weapons individuals can possess.
Click to expand...
Unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has no authority to change the Constitution.
 
AProudLefty said:
"The Second Amendment, from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own.”

meter-false.jpg

He got one thing correct though: Laws at the time that limited firearm ownership were primarily racist, aimed at controlling Black people and Native Americans.

https://www.politifact.com/factchec...den-gets-history-wrong-second-amendment-limi/

As to the cannons? I have no clue where Biden got the notion from.

Finally, the Biden haters has some meat to chew on. :thumbsup:
Click to expand...

Why, that seems a fair originalist interp. type of people =those in a militia. The weapon you could own= arms, prob some lame muzzle loading something or other...

Republicans in militias have the right to a musket and a bag of black powder
 
Micawber said:
Why, that seems a fair originalist interp. type of people =those in a militia weapon you could own= arms, then prob some lame muzzle loading something or other...
Click to expand...

There is no 'originalist interpretation'. The 2nd amendment does not list any type of weapon by type, size, brand, type of action, looks, or lethality.
 
 
T. A. Gardner said:
You can buy a bazooka. Here's a video on it. The one in the video was for sale...

Click to expand...

not without jumping through a million hoops, special licensing, etc. why lie, bitch?

The definition of a “destructive device” is found in 26 U.S.C. § 5845. ... Thus, a bazooka and the rounds would be considered destructive devices under Title II. These are not illegal but are heavily regulated at both the State and Federal level. Feb 20, 2019

Firearms - National Firearms Act Definitions - Destructive Devicehttps://www.atf.gov › ... › Mission Areas › Firearms
For the purposes of the National Firearms Act, the term “Destructive Device” means: A missile having an explosive or incendiary charge of more than 1/4 oz.

18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(4): DESTRUCTIVE DEVICE 26 U.S.C. ...https://www.atf.gov › file › downloadPDF
or balls, or bean bags are classified as destructive devices for purposes of the Gun ... 18 U.S.C. Chapter 44, and the National Firearms Act, 26 U.S.C. Chapter 53. ... 26, United States Code, classifies certain weapons as “destructive devices”​.

18 U.S. Code § 921 - Definitions | U.S. Code | US Law | LII ...https://www.law.cornell.edu › ... › CHAPTER 44
The term “destructive device” shall not include any device which is neither ... required by Federal or State environmental or game regulations for hunting purposes, ... of livelihood and profit through the repetitive purchase and resale of firearms, ...

27 CFR § 478.98 - Sales or deliveries of destructive devices ...https://www.law.cornell.edu › cfr › text
LII · Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR) · Title 27 - Alcohol, Tobacco ... The sale or delivery by a licensee of any destructive device, machine gun, ... for such person to purchase or otherwise acquire the device or weapon; and.

Machineguns, Destructive Devices and ... - Federal Registerhttps://www.federalregister.gov › 2016/01/15 › machin...
Jan 15, 2016 — The Department of Justice is amending the regulations of the Bureau of ... titled “​Machine Guns, Destructive Devices and Certain Other Firearms; ... 1 and the remittance submitted by the applicant for the purchase of the stamp ...
 
SmarterthanYou said:
I REPEAT!!!! Just because YOU agree with it and LET them do it, does not mean it's constitutional. I find it hilarious that all you leftist morons absolutely HATED Scalia, yet you practically worship this one, single, opinion as the holy grail over the 2nd Amendment.........you sheepishly accept it because you're a fucking antigun coward. You IGNORE the glaring FACT that I can buy a machine gun if it was manufactured on, or before, May 18th, 1986. But if it was manufactured on, or after, May 19th, 1986, then somehow that very same item suddenly becomes prohibited............there is NOT ONE SINGLE, CREDIBLE, CONSTITUTIONAL ARGUMENT TO BE MADE FOR THAT DISTINCTION. NOT A SINGLE ONE. It all comes down to pussies like you who are terrified of guns
Click to expand...

fuck you, chickenshit. imagine how stupid you have to be to believe a quivering, jello spined bitch who cannot go out in public without his penis-extender is somehow brave and manly, not the guy who doesn't worry about such trivial bullshit. where do you live, bitch, Beirut? and the bad guy gets to say when and where, what good does having a penis-extender on you if the bad guy gets the drop on you? why are you such a pussy? are you handicapped or what?
 
Hoosier Daddy said:
fuck you, chickenshit. imagine how stupid you have to be to believe a quivering, jello spined bitch who cannot go out in public without his penis-extender is somehow brave and manly, not the guy who doesn't worry about such trivial bullshit. where do you live, bitch, Beirut? and the bad guy gets to say when and where, what good does having a penis-extender on you if the bad guy gets the drop on you? why are you such a pussy? are you handicapped or what?
Click to expand...

triggered much, pussy? did I strike a nerve about your cowardice and penis envy????
 
Hoosier Daddy said:
fuck you, chickenshit. imagine how stupid you have to be to believe a quivering, jello spined bitch who cannot go out in public without his penis-extender is somehow brave and manly, not the guy who doesn't worry about such trivial bullshit. where do you live, bitch, Beirut? and the bad guy gets to say when and where, what good does having a penis-extender on you if the bad guy gets the drop on you? why are you such a pussy? are you handicapped or what?
Click to expand...

is that also your particular attitude towards police officers?????
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top