Table of 545 Insurrections Charges by the FBI. Do you know any of them?

5

50USA

Verified User
This was updated to July 1, 2021

[h=1]545 people have been charged in the Capitol insurrection so far. This searchable table shows them all.[/h]Since supporters of then-President Donald Trump swarmed the US Capitol on January 6 — forcing Congress to go into lockdown and damaging the halls of government — 545 people have been arrested and charged with crimes.


The FBI is seeking the public's help to identify people who took part in one of the most documented crimes in US history.
But since many rioters were allowed to walk free on January 6, it's taking some time to track them down.


This table includes the names, charges, and links to court documents of all the people charged so far. We're keeping it updated as more names are released.


[h=1]Capitol insurrection arrests made in 2021 (68 pages)[/h]

https://www.insider.com/all-the-us-capitol-pro-trump-riot-arrests-charges-names-2021-1
 
50USA said:
This was updated to July 1, 2021

[h=1]545 people have been charged in the Capitol insurrection so far. This searchable table shows them all.[/h]Since supporters of then-President Donald Trump swarmed the US Capitol on January 6 — forcing Congress to go into lockdown and damaging the halls of government — 545 people have been arrested and charged with crimes.


The FBI is seeking the public's help to identify people who took part in one of the most documented crimes in US history.
But since many rioters were allowed to walk free on January 6, it's taking some time to track them down.


This table includes the names, charges, and links to court documents of all the people charged so far. We're keeping it updated as more names are released.


[h=1]Capitol insurrection arrests made in 2021 (68 pages)[/h]

https://www.insider.com/all-the-us-capitol-pro-trump-riot-arrests-charges-names-2021-1
Click to expand...

Can we see the actual charges of insurrection?

Don’t disappoint.
 
Darth Omar said:
Can we see the actual charges of insurrection?

Don’t disappoint.
Click to expand...

Did you read all 68 pages?
By January 15, Steven D'Antuono, the assistant director in charge of the FBI's Washington field office, said the bureau had identified more than 270 suspects and taken 100 people into custody. As of June 23, six people have pleaded guilty to federal crimes stemming from the Capitol riots.

The number of people charged in the insurrection is expected to keep growing as FBI agents pore through video footage, social media posts, phone location data, and tips from the public.
 
209349044_5284770574949287_3393174344794782393_n.jpg
 
50USA said:
Did you read all 68 pages?
By January 15, Steven D'Antuono, the assistant director in charge of the FBI's Washington field office, said the bureau had identified more than 270 suspects and taken 100 people into custody. As of June 23, six people have pleaded guilty to federal crimes stemming from the Capitol riots.

The number of people charged in the insurrection is expected to keep growing as FBI agents pore through video footage, social media posts, phone location data, and tips from the public.
Click to expand...

18 U.S.C. 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection

Let’s see those numbers on the charging documents.
 
Darth Omar said:
OP claimed to have charges of insurrection.
Click to expand...
It’s incorrect, there have been no charges, yet. It can still be referred to as an insurrection because it was a violent try to stop the certification of the vote. It failed, but it was an attempted insurrection.
 
Phantasmal said:
It’s incorrect, there have been no charges, yet. It can still be referred to as an insurrection because it was a violent try to stop the certification of the vote. It failed, but it was an attempted insurrection.
Click to expand...

They didn’t fail in Portland.

There’s no reason not to charge him. Hit him with a superseding indictment later. It’s not like they can’t add on additional indictments.

Rhodes is a flight risk and they won’t arrest him. Why?
 
Darth Omar said:
They didn’t fail in Portland.

There’s no reason not to charge him. Hit him with a superseding indictment later. It’s not like they can’t add on additional indictments.

Rhodes is a flight risk and they won’t arrest him. Why?
Click to expand...
How did they succeed in Portland? You keep stating a false equivalency.
 
Darth Omar said:
They didn’t fail in Portland.

There’s no reason not to charge him. Hit him with a superseding indictment later. It’s not like they can’t add on additional indictments.

Rhodes is a flight risk and they won’t arrest him. Why?
Click to expand...
It’s called building a case, they may nor arrest him, there might not be enough evidence. Time will tell.
 
[FONT=&quot]Not everyone is going to be charged with 18 U.S.C.2383. There are other charges depending on what they were arrested for.

The Capitol Hill rioters are more likely to be charged with insurrection or sedition. Under 18 U.S.C. 2383, rebellion or insurrection is defined as inciting, assisting, or engaging in “any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.” The penalty is up to ten years in prison and disqualification from holding any public office. A prosecution on this charge will hinge on the specific facts of the case, including the defendant’s intentions and actions, and on how the government and the courts define “rebellion” and “insurrection.”[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Here, the Government will likely argue that the Capitol Hill rioters were rebelling against the “authority” and “laws” of the United States by trying to interfere with or prevent Congress from fulfilling its constitutional duty in certifying the election. In fact, the rioters succeeded in delaying the counting of the electoral college votes, as lawmakers had to go into hiding during the riot and certified the election later that night after the Capitol was cleared.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The rioters charged with insurrection or rebellion will likely defend themselves by stating that they were upholding and protecting the U.S. and its laws by protesting what they believe to be an illegitimate election. And of course, they can also honestly argue that they were invited to march on the Capitol by the then-sitting U.S. President.

Others at the Capitol may be charged with more minor crimes, such as trespassing on a restricted building or grounds. A person can be charged under 18 U.S.C. 1752 if 1) they knowingly entered a restricted building or grounds without lawful authority, 2) knowingly and intentionally acting to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, 3) knowingly obstructing the entry or exit into any restricted buildings or grounds with the intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government or official functions, 4) knowingly engaging in any acts of violence against persons or property on restricted buildings or grounds, or 5) knowingly operating an unmanned aircraft system (drone) with the intent to cause such a craft to enter a restricted building or grounds.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“Restricted buildings or grounds” means any area of the White House, Vice President’s residence, or buildings or grounds “so restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance.” That would include the Capitol, at least while it is certifying election results.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Generally, a conviction under Section 1752 is a misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in prison. However, a conviction can carry up to ten years in prison and a hefty fine if the person convicted used or carried “a deadly or dangerous weapon or firearm” or “the offense results in significant bodily injury.” This is where individuals caught on camera beating police officers or carrying firearms in the Capitol will have significant exposure to serious prison time.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Some of the people charged in these cases will have legitimate defenses. For those charged with crimes arising only from their unauthorized entry into the Capitol, for example, there is video evidence of some police officers letting the protestors in or otherwise not acting to arrest or deter them once they entered the building. It will be difficult to bring sedition charges against individuals who were seen simply standing around or walking in the capitol rotunda, even though others around them were engaged in violent or seditious acts. On the other hand, individuals with firearms, people engaging in violence against officers, and those who led the charge on the Capitol will need to prepare strong defenses to more serious charges.

https://thefederaldocket.com/what-k...-can-be-brought-against-capitol-hill-rioters/[/FONT]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top