10 INDISPUTABLE FACTS on the 2020 Election That Argue for Audits

PostmodernProphet said:
and yet, any investigation that looks suspicious will obviously leave suspicion......be complete, be thorough, be open........did the lib'ruls do an audit?......if so, why not?......
Click to expand...

Translation: give me the results I want or it’s not good enough. That’s just the reality of what this is
 
ExpressLane said:
The state senate that is elected by the people of Arizona disagree with you they said a forensic audit was needed. I'll wait for those results thankyou. And by the way the COURT agrees with the State Senate of Arizona. Did you notice the video of the two women [mother and daughter] in Georgia that were running the same stack of ballots through the counting machine time after time after time. Of course they did that after the observers had been sent home. :laugh: Think that can't be done and your eyes are lying? In Maricopa country they found multiple ballots with no bar code so nothing would stop them from being run multiple times.
Click to expand...

Go bite the kraken's ass. You people are obnoxious and unbearable. You belong in a propaganda riddled authoritarian country. And I don't even like Biden.
 
ExpressLane said:
If the audit is fully transparent and Biden wins so be it. I'm not afraid of the results are you?
Click to expand...

Then you should have accepted it by now. The recounts and court cases gave Trump underserved and extensive accommodation. He lost them all. I am not afraid of all those results. Are you?
 
ExpressLane said:
4. Incumbents who gain votes win: Incumbent vote gain is another key indicator of presidential race outcomes. Since 1892, and as the expansion of the United States slowed, only six presidents have lost re-election. All six had fewer total votes in their re-election campaigns than in their initial campaigns. All incumbents who gained votes won re-election.
Click to expand...

Some of your numbers are somewhat misleading. For example, the claim is that only six presidents have been defeated since 1892 and all had fewer total votes in their losing re-election campaign.

That only holds true if you start in 1892. Start eight years earlier in 1884 and that makes the generalization false.

1884 Cleveland received 4,914,482 and won the presidency
1888 Cleveland received 5,538,163 and lost the presidency

I will address some of the other points in separate posts.
 
Nordberg said:
Then you should have accepted it by now. The recounts and court cases gave Trump underserved and extensive accommodation. He lost them all. I am not afraid of all those results. Are you?
Click to expand...
Recounts are not Forensic audits. Non of those court cases examined the evidence they were thrown out for lack of standing etc.
 
Flash said:
Some of your numbers are somewhat misleading. For example, the claim is that only six presidents have been defeated since 1892 and all had fewer total votes in their losing re-election campaign.

That only holds true if you start in 1892. Start eight years earlier in 1884 and that makes the generalization false.

1884 Cleveland received 4,914,482 and won the presidency
1888 Cleveland received 5,538,163 and lost the presidency

I will address some of the other points in separate posts.
Click to expand...
Yawn.
 
ExpressLane said:
The state senate that is elected by the people of Arizona disagree with you they said a forensic audit was needed. I'll wait for those results thankyou. And by the way the COURT agrees with the State Senate of Arizona. Did you notice the video of the two women [mother and daughter] in Georgia that were running the same stack of ballots through the counting machine time after time after time. Of course they did that after the observers had been sent home. :laugh: Think that can't be done and your eyes are lying? In Maricopa country they found multiple ballots with no bar code so nothing would stop them from being run multiple times.
Click to expand...

You're going to be disappointed then. Face it, it wouldn't matter if every single state "audited" last year's election. You all will never accept that Biden won, fair and square. I'll just leave you this in place of wasting any more words.

sF48VsV.jpg
 
PostmodernProphet said:
explain that counting the same fake ballots over and over is different than looking to see if any of them are fake?........I wonder if you see the difference.......
Click to expand...

How many fake ballots were cast for Trump? OP says the "bellweather" counties/states "indisputably" went to Trump, but I'm disputing it right now, I think Trump had to cheat to get the amount of votes he did.
 
Mr.Badguy said:
How many fake ballots were cast for Trump? OP says the "bellweather" counties/states "indisputably" went to Trump, but I'm disputing it right now, I think Trump had to cheat to get the amount of votes he did.
Click to expand...

why don't you want to know how many fake ballots were cast for Trump?........I would think you would........it is sad that demmycrats don't care about people committing fraud......
 
Flash said:
Some of your numbers are somewhat misleading. For example, the claim is that only six presidents have been defeated since 1892 and all had fewer total votes in their losing re-election campaign.

That only holds true if you start in 1892. Start eight years earlier in 1884 and that makes the generalization false.

1884 Cleveland received 4,914,482 and won the presidency
1888 Cleveland received 5,538,163 and lost the presidency

I will address some of the other points in separate posts.
Click to expand...

Flash, help me better understand this process. I really haven’t been paying attention here but from what little I do read the group doing the audit is an obscure group headed by Trump supporters. And thus, very few in the public are taking this group seriously and will believe their results.

Is that close to accurate or left wing spin?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top