Former Acting Attorney General Testifies About Trump’s Efforts to Subvert Election

memorygal said:
hey little uneducated fella... here is the rule.

12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

Please point out where I broke that rule.
Click to expand...

Not my call, miss.

IIRC, you were specifically warned a couple times in your intro thread.
 
guno said:
Jeffrey A. Rosen, who was acting attorney general during the Trump administration, has told the Justice Department watchdog and congressional investigators that one of his deputies tried to help former President Donald J. Trump subvert the results of the 2020 election, according to a person familiar with the interviews.

Mr. Rosen had a two-hour meeting on Friday with the Justice Department’s office of the inspector general and provided closed-door testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Saturday.

Mr. Rosen on Friday told investigators from the inspector general’s office about five encounters with Mr. Clark, including one in late December during which his deputy admitted to meeting with Mr. Trump and pledged that he would not do so again, according to a person familiar with the interview.

Mr. Rosen also described subsequent exchanges with Mr. Clark, who continued to press colleagues to make statements about the election that they found to be untrue, according to a person familiar with the interview.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...to-subvert-election/ar-AAN3uLK?ocid=Peregrine
Click to expand...

I’m sure that will be in the report.
 
memorygal said:
prove it mr. tattle tale. Now I see why your wife cheats on you.
Click to expand...

It's not up to me to prove it. It's up for the forum owners to decide if the report warrants action or not.

Just like I support all business owners to require vax cards and masks of employees and customers.

Just like I support the right of women to be free from an abusive idiot husband she married out of High School and finally realizing that he's a fucking loser who will never change.

Some women are smart enough to think "Where will I be in 5 years?" If they are happy with the answer, God bless them. If they see it's not what they want, then they need to do something about it.

Divorce is admitting failure. It's hard, but like abandoning a sinking ship, it's necessary to save the crew and live to fight another day.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
It's not up to me to prove it. It's up for the forum owners to decide if the report warrants action or not.

Just like I support all business owners to require vax cards and masks of employees and customers.

Just like I support the right of women to be free from an abusive idiot husband she married out of High School and finally realizing that he's a fucking loser who will never change.

Some women are smart enough to think "Where will I be in 5 years?" If they are happy with the answer, God bless them. If they see it's not what they want, then they need to do something about it.

Divorce is admitting failure. It's hard, but like abandoning a sinking ship, it's necessary to save the crew and live to fight another day.
Click to expand...

yet you keep your wife in chains... shame on you. You will not be able to save yourself. My husband is 100% correct when he said you were a POS coward
 
Dutch Uncle said:
It's not up to me to prove it. It's up for the forum owners to decide if the report warrants action or not.

Just like I support all business owners to require vax cards and masks of employees and customers.

Just like I support the right of women to be free from an abusive idiot husband she married out of High School and finally realizing that he's a fucking loser who will never change.

Some women are smart enough to think "Where will I be in 5 years?" If they are happy with the answer, God bless them. If they see it's not what they want, then they need to do something about it.

Divorce is admitting failure. It's hard, but like abandoning a sinking ship, it's necessary to save the crew and live to fight another day.
Click to expand...

When they come and do a welfare check on your wife... I hope you are stupid enough to fight it!
 
Althea said:
Or:

It's a girl who desires to be taken seriously by those she aspires to be, (popular girls in school) who plays the part of an impotent male who resorts to violent posts as a way to make himself feel important.


It's a toss up. The posts scream for attention.
Click to expand...

Yes. Like a few others I could name, he/she/it/them isn't here to discuss issues, politics, current events. They're just here to get the attention they don't get elsewhere.
 
memorygal said:
yet you keep your wife in chains... shame on you. You will not be able to save yourself. My husband is 100% correct when he said you were a POS coward
Click to expand...
Your husband will be going back to jail...and probably for a longer time, within the next five years. What will you do then?

Are the any little losers you'd be stuck with raising while he's gone for 1-5 years?
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Going for *another* 12b, Sparky?
Click to expand...

I think that was a bullseye, but it's not my call.

What's also not my call is whether this will be a "first offense" or added time to the sentence?
I have no doubt s/he knows what it means to be sentenced. :laugh:
 
Dutch Uncle said:
I think that was a bullseye, but it's not my call.

What's also not my call is whether this will be a "first offense" or added time to the sentence?
I have no doubt s/he knows what it means to be sentenced. :laugh:
Click to expand...

Me neither. What a maroon. What a gulla-bull. lol
 
memorygal said:
When they come and do a welfare check on your wife... I hope you are stupid enough to fight it!
Click to expand...

Why? I support our police and community to check on the elderly and abusive husbands beating up their wives.

My wife has local family to support and frequent visitations. If she needed help it'd be easy for her to both get it and for others to see she needs it. Do you have this same protection from your abusive husband? Has he beaten others besides you?
 
Nothing can happen to hold Repukes to account for their vast crimes until we hold so much power we can steamroll
justice over them. They won't hold their own responsible under the law for anything.
 
Micawber said:
Nothing can happen to hold Repukes to account for their vast crimes until we hold so much power we can steamroll
justice over them. They won't hold their own responsible under the law for anything.
Click to expand...

Isn't that a pretty shitty view of the American justice system for a lawyer?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Why? I support our police and community to check on the elderly and abusive husbands beating up their wives.

My wife has local family to support and frequent visitations. If she needed help it'd be easy for her to both get it and for others to see she needs it. Do you have this same protection from your abusive husband? Has he beaten others besides you?
Click to expand...

lol I have police connections, beware little man
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top