Sandy Hook families refuse to release requested info on their "dead" kids

It appears 9th Grade didn't teach Bobbie as much as he thought.

He was 23 y/o when he finally gave it up.

I would give him credit for sticking to it, but he only stayed that long because his mammy got more welfare by being able to claim she had a child in school.
 
So why does the FBI say there were no murders at sandy hook?

The FBI relies on voluntary data reporting. If a police force is busy with the aftermath of a mass shooting they probably don't want to have someone take the time to fill out paperwork they are not required to do.

If you bothered to read the FBI data declaration, you might have figured out your error.
 
He was 23 y/o when he finally gave it up.

I would give him credit for sticking to it, but he only stayed that long because his mammy got more welfare by being able to claim she had a child in school.

That would explain it.
 
Remington apparently hasn't the nerve to make an allegation that the massacre is a hoax. It shamefully implies this instead. But to what purpose? Absent a claim in the pleadings that would cause the school records to be relevant to its defense the company has no argument as to why the records should be produced, meaning the request for the records will be routinely denied.
 
Remington apparently hasn't the nerve to make an allegation that the massacre is a hoax. It shamefully implies this instead. But to what purpose? Absent a claim in the pleadings that would cause the school records to be relevant to its defense the company has no argument as to why the records should be produced, meaning the request for the records will be routinely denied.

Why would Remington lie about the massacre? It's a matter of record and law.

That said, suing the manufacturer is wrong in this case. The problem is that a mentally ill mother with a severely mentally ill kid had access to guns and nobody gave a shit until the kid murdered a bunch of other kids.

Same for James Holmes. Mentally ill adult accesses fire arms and kills a bunch of people.

Same for Steven Paddock. Mentally ill adult accesses firearms and....well, you get the picture. Now convince me it's the manufacturers fault.

Last winter there was a massive pileup in Texas killing several people. Should the survivors and family members be suing Ford and GMC? No. That's fucking stupid. Work to make roads safer with tech and education. Sue the State.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/car-crash-pile-up-fort-worth-texas/
At least 6 killed in massive car pileup in Texas that left drivers trapped in vehicles
 
Why would Remington lie about the massacre? It's a matter of record and law.

That said, suing the manufacturer is wrong in this case. The problem is that a mentally ill mother with a severely mentally ill kid had access to guns and nobody gave a shit until the kid murdered a bunch of other kids.

Same for James Holmes. Mentally ill adult accesses fire arms and kills a bunch of people.

Same for Steven Paddock. Mentally ill adult accesses firearms and....well, you get the picture. Now convince me it's the manufacturers fault.

Last winter there was a massive pileup in Texas killing several people. Should the survivors and family members be suing Ford and GMC? No. That's fucking stupid. Work to make roads safer with tech and education. Sue the State.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/car-crash-pile-up-fort-worth-texas/
At least 6 killed in massive car pileup in Texas that left drivers trapped in vehicles

The lie is by innuendo. The only possible reason is to feed the lie (without outwardly expressing it) so that it contaminates the jury pool.
 
The lie is by innuendo. The only possible reason is to feed the lie (without outwardly expressing it) so that it contaminates the jury pool.

Sorry, but what am I missing? What's the lie? Other than fucking lawyers?
 
Here's the FBI page that says there were no murders in Newtown CT in 2012.

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u....w_enforcement_by_connecticut_by_city_2012.xls

I'm still trying to figure out if you are a liar or simply demented:

https://www.fbi.gov/audio-repositor...-shooter-and-mass-casualty-incidents.mp3/view
The FBI is partnering with other federal agencies to prevent, respond, and recover from active shooter and mass casualty incidents, such as the school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut.

 
The lie is what this thread is about - the implication from the discovery request that the kids are an invention. It is from the fucking lawyers.

What fucking moron is claiming that? Not the OP.

I'd expect Rudy to try to pass that through court, but any lawyer who does it is sure to face both recrimination and a severe loss of reputation...if not disbarment.
 
Remington apparently hasn't the nerve to make an allegation that the massacre is a hoax. It shamefully implies this instead. But to what purpose? Absent a claim in the pleadings that would cause the school records to be relevant to its defense the company has no argument as to why the records should be produced, meaning the request for the records will be routinely denied.

The request will be denied because the judge knows he will be dead with a week if he admits the whole thing was a hoax.
 
People don't care about Ashli Bobbit's past, either. Past record is no justification for police misconduct.

HAHAHAHA. You don't want to talk about ashli's past because it's spotless. Likewise you don't want to talk about the past of george floyd because it proves he was a career criminal.
 
HAHAHAHA. You don't want to talk about ashli's past because it's spotless. Likewise you don't want to talk about the past of george floyd because it proves he was a career criminal.

I've never said anything negative about Ashli's past. It is no more relevant than Floyd's past when it comes to police misconduct.

Could you link to some examples of media accounts saying Floyd was a wonderful fellow? I don't remember seeing any of those.
 
Back
Top