Biden looking to reboot Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy

anatta

100% recycled karma
Some White House officials reportedly viewed the Supreme Court ruling last week upholding the Trump-era Remain in Mexico policy as a chance to slow the pace of President Biden’s immigration changes that they feared were sparking the crisis at the border.

Many of them, according to the New York Times, had already been thinking about rebooting former President Donald Trump’s policy in a narrow way to stem the tide of migrants.


The officials saw the justices’ decision as a way to give Biden political cover to alter his predecessor’s immigration policy without angering Democrats who railed against those programs during the past four years.

Ditching the Remain in Mexico program was one of several Trump’s immigration programs that Biden reversed or rolled back in the early days of his administration — and that critics contend acted as a welcome invitation to migrants from Mexico and Central American countries.

There have been more than 1 million illegal border crossings this year, breaking records month over month.

They are backed into a corner on their broader immigration agenda,” Doris Meissner, the commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service from 1993 to 2000, told the Times. “The only tools that are available in the near term are pretty much pure enforcement.”

Biden officials also are worried about the implications the out-of-control border situation would have on midterm elections next fall.

“This desire to reverse Trump’s policies and to do so quickly has landed the Biden administration in this predicament, which was not unpredictable and is very sad to watch,”Alan Bersin, who served as commissioner of Customs and Border Protection in the Obama administration, told the Times.
 
The administration is mulling revamping the Remain in Mexico policy to allow a smaller number of immigrants seeking asylum to wait in Mexico as their cases are being processed in the courts — and provide them with better living conditions and access to lawyers

The White House is discussing the change in policy, which some are calling “Remain in Mexico lite,” with Mexico to ensure that it conforms with the Supreme Court’s ruling and still holds true to Biden’s campaign pledge to end the “inhumane” program, which he tried to do after taking office on Jan. 20.

The Supreme Court upheld a federal judge’s order requiring the policy — known formally as the Migrant Protection Protocols program — to be reinstated.
he chance that the Remain in Mexico policy could be revived has some immigration advocates angry at Biden for going back on his word to make the process more humane.

“One of his campaign promises was to end MPP. He did that. He should stand by that,” Marielena Hincapié, executive director of National Immigration Law Center, told Politico. “The answer is not to simply find a gentler, kinder MPP 2.0. That completely flies in the face of his promise.”

The Department of Homeland Security said it disagrees with the court’s ruling and will appeal it.
https://nypost.com/2021/09/06/biden-to-reinstate-trump-remain-in-mexico-policy-report/
 
How about a 'No Vacancy' policy?
Congress would have to do something -an oxymoron
The reason for REMAIN in the first place under Trump was to stop the caravans, and overwhelming facilities.
When Biden ended it -we've gotten to the point they have to allow COVID+ out of the facilites ( etc)

I wonder though if Obrador would go along. He didnt want to under Trump -only the threat of sanctions forced him
 
As 'Automation' takes over MORE Human Jobs, we are only increasing the 'Welfare Class' of the Future.
If you like supporting people with your Taxes, MORE people is right up your alley.
 
Some White House officials reportedly viewed the Supreme Court ruling last week upholding the Trump-era Remain in Mexico policy as a chance to slow the pace of President Biden’s immigration changes that they feared were sparking the crisis at the border.

Many of them, according to the New York Times, had already been thinking about rebooting former President Donald Trump’s policy in a narrow way to stem the tide of migrants.


The officials saw the justices’ decision as a way to give Biden political cover to alter his predecessor’s immigration policy without angering Democrats who railed against those programs during the past four years.

Ditching the Remain in Mexico program was one of several Trump’s immigration programs that Biden reversed or rolled back in the early days of his administration — and that critics contend acted as a welcome invitation to migrants from Mexico and Central American countries.

There have been more than 1 million illegal border crossings this year, breaking records month over month.

They are backed into a corner on their broader immigration agenda,” Doris Meissner, the commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service from 1993 to 2000, told the Times. “The only tools that are available in the near term are pretty much pure enforcement.”

Biden officials also are worried about the implications the out-of-control border situation would have on midterm elections next fall.

“This desire to reverse Trump’s policies and to do so quickly has landed the Biden administration in this predicament, which was not unpredictable and is very sad to watch,”Alan Bersin, who served as commissioner of Customs and Border Protection in the Obama administration, told the Times.

My feelings about it would depend on in what "narrow way" they are attempting to restart the policy. There are many objectionable things about the policy, but I suspect there are, as always, some good things about the policy as well. Id have to see the changes to have an opinion on if I thought it was good to bring back some parts of it.
 
Translation: That was a Trump policy success.

A grudging admission.

Again, I am sure there are parts of it that are reasonable. Personally I think we are a stronger nation than Mexico and better suited to help people in desperate situations.
 
Again, I am sure there are parts of it that are reasonable. Personally I think we are a stronger nation than Mexico and better suited to help people in desperate situations.
So basically you’re for open borders.
 
Translation: That was a Trump policy success.
A grudging admission.
damn straight. the borders after REMAIN was instituted were secure, in that the numbers were 1/5
what they are now. border patrol could handle the "encounters" as they are called
 
I know. What do you think happens to women and children who remain in Mexico or especially being pushed out of there into dangerous places?
Mexico is considered a safe country.
not a nice place to have to stay,but since we are unable to handle 120k encounters a month
and Biden is dumping illegals with COVID+ across the country, it is what it is.

we dont run our country for the benefit of the world's priorities -it's "America first"

Women are more likely to be raped or sold into sex slaves on the journey then in the refugee camps
 
Mexico is considered a safe country.
not a nice place to have to stay,but since we are unable to handle 120k encounters a month
and Biden is dumping illegals with COVID+ across the country, it is what it is.

we dont run our country for the benefit of the world's priorities -it's "America first"

Women are more likely to be raped or sold into sex slaves on the journey then in the refugee camps

And yet people have different attitude when it comes to Afghanistan. :thinking:
 
If you’re in favor of accommodating illegal aliens, I consider that to be in favor of open borders.

ok, depends on what you mean by accommodating... Holding them until they can have a hearing? Absolutely, otherwise who determined they were actually illegal? Due Process.
 
ok, depends on what you mean by accommodating... Holding them until they can have a hearing? Absolutely, otherwise who determined they were actually illegal? Due Process.
tyhey are not being held for a hearing..
in fact it's so bad they are not even given a "notice to appear" - just told to contact immigration
 
Back
Top