This is why Trump will be reinstated soon.

[Into the Night]

You didn't read it idiot:



FOR THE OTHER AGENCIES.

FOR THE OTHER AGENCIES.

You are functionally illiterate.

Inversion fallacy. Trolling.

 

[Into the Night]

LMAO!

You literally said the Federal Reserve provides guidance for other agencies.

That is what you quoted, moron.

You obviously struggle with reading comprehension.

Semantics fallacy. Insult fallacy. Trolling.

 

[Mr.Badguy]

Recounting fake ballots means nothing. Georgia never chose it's electors. Only the legislature of a State can choose it's electors. Putin wants Democrats in power. He's said so several times.

Believing Putin when he says things is the sign of a true sucker.

 

[Into the Night]

Believing Putin when he says things is the sign of a true sucker.

Putin is a socialist, idiot. Trump is not. Democrats are.

 

[Mr.Badguy]

Putin is a socialist, idiot. Trump is not. Democrats are.

Insult fallacy. Trolling.

 

[Nordberg]

Putin is a socialist, idiot. Trump is not. Democrats are.

What a terrible sentence. So many lies in so few words.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Denial of logic. Learn what 'fact' means.

I am curious as to what logic you think is being denied with this statement:

Those crazy people are well represented on this board. Logic and facts are things to be dismissed in favor of your right-wing political beliefs.

Nordberg was expressing an opinion.

Your attempt to throw shit at the wall pretending to be intelligent is not working well for you. Explain how logic was denied. You can't because there was no logic being denied. You have created a paradox. If you claim the opinion was the result of logic then there was no denial of logic but rather logic was used to reach a conclusion you disagree with which would mean you are the one denying the logic. If you claim it was not a result of logic then there was no denial of logic but simply an opinion being expressed. There is no way for a person to logically reach the conclusion that Norgberg's opinion was a denial of logic. It is only through the use of demagogy or idiocy that one could claim Nordberg's opinion was a denial of logic.

I anticipate your response will most likely be a fallacy fallacy in which you will not address any of the issues I have raised but instead you will just accuse me of a fallacy that is not supported by any reasonable logic.

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

NOT dictatorial and certainly NOT illegal. Be less stupid.

You are correct: refusing to accept the result of a Presidential election is not illegal.

BUT Trump is the first loser who has ever done that. (Don't try to cite Al Gore. He conceded to Dubya after the 2000 election, following a Supreme Court ruling on the knife-edge Florida recount.)

So tell me: what is so freaking special about Trump? And what if more bad losers do the same in future - won't that be great for America?

 

[Nordberg]

You are correct: refusing to accept the result of a Presidential election is not illegal.

BUT Trump is the first loser who has ever done that. (Don't try to cite Al Gore. He conceded to Dubya five weeks after the 2000 election, following a Supreme Court ruling on the knife-edge Florida recount.)

So tell me: what is so freaking special about Trump? And what if more bad losers do the same in future - won't that be great for America?

We always bragged about how we had a peaceful turnover in our elections. That was told to many nations as we held ourselves up as an example. Since Trump, we can no longer say that. That is one of many norms that Trump fractured. We will never be the same country again.

 

[Into the Night]

Insult fallacy. Trolling.

Fallacy fallacy. Mockery. Trolling.

 

[Into the Night]

What a terrible sentence. So many lies in so few words.

Are you saying Putin is a capitalist??? Are you saying Democrats are capitalists???

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

 

[Into the Night]

I am curious as to what logic you think is being denied with this statement:

Those crazy people are well represented on this board. Logic and facts are things to be dismissed in favor of your right-wing political beliefs.

RQAA.

Nordberg was expressing an opinion.

Irrelevance fallacy.

Your attempt to throw shit at the wall pretending to be intelligent is not working well for you. Explain how logic was denied.

The same way you do. Inversion fallacy. Semantics fallacy.

You can't because there was no logic being denied.

Lie. You are denying logic right now.

You have created a paradox.

No paradox. Mockery. Trolling.

If you claim the opinion was the result of logic then there was no denial of logic but rather logic was used to reach a conclusion you disagree with which would mean you are the one denying the logic. If you claim it was not a result of logic then there was no denial of logic but simply an opinion being expressed. There is no way for a person to logically reach the conclusion that Norgberg's opinion was a denial of logic. It is only through the use of demagogy or idiocy that one could claim Nordberg's opinion was a denial of logic.

Both of you deny logic. Straw man fallacy.

I anticipate your response will most likely be a fallacy fallacy in which you will not address any of the issues I have raised but instead you will just accuse me of a fallacy that is not supported by any reasonable logic.

You have not raised any issues. You are simply insistent on denying logic.

 

[Into the Night]

You are correct: refusing to accept the result of a Presidential election is not illegal.

There was no election in 2020. The election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats.

BUT Trump is the first loser who has ever done that. (Don't try to cite Al Gore. He conceded to Dubya after the 2000 election, following a Supreme Court ruling on the knife-edge Florida recount.)

The Supreme Court does not have authority to choose the electors for any State.

So tell me: what is so freaking special about Trump?

He's a damn fine President. RQAA.

And what if more bad losers do the same in future - won't that be great for America?

Can't lose what never took place.

 

[Into the Night]

We always bragged about how we had a peaceful turnover in our elections. That was told to many nations as we held ourselves up as an example. Since Trump, we can no longer say that. That is one of many norms that Trump fractured. We will never be the same country again.

The DEMOCRATS faulted the election. Not Trump. Do not blame Trump for what Democrats did.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

RQAA.

Irrelevance fallacy.

The same way you do. Inversion fallacy. Semantics fallacy.

Lie. You are denying logic right now.

No paradox. Mockery. Trolling.

Both of you deny logic. Straw man fallacy.

You have not raised any issues. You are simply insistent on denying logic.

It seems I was correct. You resorted to your standard fallacy fallacy.

Thanks for proving you are unable to have an intelligent discussion. You were unable to tell us how the statement was a fallacy providing evidence that your claim of fallacy was a fallacy fallacy.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Both of you deny logic. Straw man fallacy.

Please tell us how I changed your argument. If I did not change your argument then there was no straw man fallacy. Thus proving once again you are a one trick pony that can only resort to your fallacy fallacy.

Fallacy fallacy - when a poster simply claims a fallacy without explaining how the statement was a fallacy.

 

[Nordberg]

Are you saying Putin is a capitalist??? Are you saying Democrats are capitalists???

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Is that what I said? That is another fallacy, fallacy. Do you feel it fair to change subjects and attack that. You know that is a strawman argument, don't you?

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

There was no election in 2020. The election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats.

Says who? TRUMP? Pseudologia fallacy.

Any loser could say “I was robbed!” and find people like geriatric Giuliani, the Kraken lady and the MyPillow nut to say “Yes he was!” They just can’t find any evidence worth a damn.

He's a damn fine President.

There have been many fine presidents. Whether that includes Trump is a matter of opinion, and opinion has been taken according to the Constitution: he lost.
None of those fine presidents, or any president, would have considered doing what Trump is doing. He is The One Who Can Never Lose.

It’s all about his monstrous ego, that’s all it has ever been about. And some people want to see this creature back in the White House.

 

[Into the Night]

It seems I was correct. You resorted to your standard fallacy fallacy.
Thanks for proving you are unable to have an intelligent discussion. You were unable to tell us how the statement was a fallacy providing evidence that your claim of fallacy was a fallacy fallacy.

No, YOU resorted to your usual fallacies. YOU made them. Inversion fallacy. Trolling. You are not having a discussion. Void argument fallacy.

 

[Joe Capitalist]

This would be hysterical, if it weren't so sad.

Yeah, it's sad that TrumpTards are so fucking stupid. Thank God many are unvaccinated and dying from COVID.

What goes around, comes around. Venegance is bliss.